Physicians’ perspectives and practice in atopic dermatitis management: a cross-sectional online survey in Japan

IF 1.1 Q4 ALLERGY
S. Kaneko, Takeshi Nakahara, H. Murota, Akio Tanaka, Yoko Kataoka, T. Kakamu, Hiroyuki Kanoh, Yuko Watanabe, Norito Katoh
{"title":"Physicians’ perspectives and practice in atopic dermatitis management: a cross-sectional online survey in Japan","authors":"S. Kaneko, Takeshi Nakahara, H. Murota, Akio Tanaka, Yoko Kataoka, T. Kakamu, Hiroyuki Kanoh, Yuko Watanabe, Norito Katoh","doi":"10.3389/jcia.2024.12567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data on the problems physicians face when providing care for atopic dermatitis (AD) is limited. To understand the current status of AD management in Japan and identify the difficulties physicians are having and their support requirements, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the AD task force of the Japanese Society for Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy. Society members were sent an online questionnaire on demographic information, daily clinical practice, and perceptions of AD management. Using responses to 17 items listed as barriers to the treatment of atopic dermatitis (Question 12) and questions about the treatment difficulty of those items, 284 respondents were divided into three groups using unstratified cluster analysis. These three groups were classified as high-difficulty, medium-difficulty, and low-difficulty groups, and the relationship between physicians’ cognition and daily practice was examined for each group. There were no significant differences in affiliations or specializations among the three clusters. The low-difficulty group had a significantly higher proportion of participants believing that it was possible to achieve long-term remission, satisfaction, and motivation in AD management while carrying out precise assessments of skin lesions as part of their daily practice. Some physicians experience problems in their practice. This results indicate that AD management can be improved if satisfaction and motivation can be increased by providing appropriate support.","PeriodicalId":15543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jcia.2024.12567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data on the problems physicians face when providing care for atopic dermatitis (AD) is limited. To understand the current status of AD management in Japan and identify the difficulties physicians are having and their support requirements, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the AD task force of the Japanese Society for Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy. Society members were sent an online questionnaire on demographic information, daily clinical practice, and perceptions of AD management. Using responses to 17 items listed as barriers to the treatment of atopic dermatitis (Question 12) and questions about the treatment difficulty of those items, 284 respondents were divided into three groups using unstratified cluster analysis. These three groups were classified as high-difficulty, medium-difficulty, and low-difficulty groups, and the relationship between physicians’ cognition and daily practice was examined for each group. There were no significant differences in affiliations or specializations among the three clusters. The low-difficulty group had a significantly higher proportion of participants believing that it was possible to achieve long-term remission, satisfaction, and motivation in AD management while carrying out precise assessments of skin lesions as part of their daily practice. Some physicians experience problems in their practice. This results indicate that AD management can be improved if satisfaction and motivation can be increased by providing appropriate support.
特应性皮炎治疗中医生的观点和实践:日本横断面在线调查
有关医生在治疗特应性皮炎(AD)时所面临问题的数据十分有限。为了了解日本特应性皮炎管理的现状,确定医生遇到的困难及其所需的支持,日本皮肤免疫学和过敏学会特应性皮炎工作组开展了一项横断面在线调查。学会成员收到了一份在线调查问卷,内容涉及人口统计学信息、日常临床实践以及对AD管理的看法。通过对被列为特应性皮炎治疗障碍的 17 个项目(问题 12)的回答以及有关这些项目的治疗难度的问题,采用非分层聚类分析法将 284 名受访者分为三组。这三组被分为高难度组、中难度组和低难度组,并对每组医生的认知与日常实践之间的关系进行了研究。三个组别在隶属关系或专业方面没有明显差异。在低难度组中,认为在日常工作中对皮损进行精确评估的同时有可能实现长期缓解、满意度和AD管理积极性的参与者比例明显较高。有些医生在实践中会遇到问题。这一结果表明,如果能通过提供适当的支持来提高满意度和积极性,就能改善注意力缺失症的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信