One for all and all for one: a review on the commonality of risk to honeybees and wild pollinators and the benefits of beekeepers in conservation

Melissa A. Y. Oddie, Bjørn Dahle
{"title":"One for all and all for one: a review on the commonality of risk to honeybees and wild pollinators and the benefits of beekeepers in conservation","authors":"Melissa A. Y. Oddie, Bjørn Dahle","doi":"10.3389/frbee.2024.1305679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pollinator declines across the globe are centrally driven by a synergistic interaction between intensive land use, pesticides, and climate change. Competition between managed and wild pollinators has been a growing topic of research, however the ensuing social conflict builds antagonism between beekeepers and conservationists, two parties that have an interest in protecting natural diversity for pollinators. The threats perpetuating this potential for competition are as real for managed bees as wild species and uniting both groups, wherever possible, can create long lasting and meaningful change in current agricultural practices. This review examines the most recent literature on pollinator competition and the common threats that drive it. It also delves into the social elements of beekeeping and examines the potential for beekeepers to contribute to the protection of natural habitats. Beekeepers have a genuine interest to preserve natural space and with their charismatic species, dutiful observations, and innovative techniques, they can be valuable assets in filling knowledge gaps and generating public interest. Pollinator strategies in the future should include beekeepers as key stakeholders if their impacts are to be improved.","PeriodicalId":217610,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bee Science","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bee Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frbee.2024.1305679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pollinator declines across the globe are centrally driven by a synergistic interaction between intensive land use, pesticides, and climate change. Competition between managed and wild pollinators has been a growing topic of research, however the ensuing social conflict builds antagonism between beekeepers and conservationists, two parties that have an interest in protecting natural diversity for pollinators. The threats perpetuating this potential for competition are as real for managed bees as wild species and uniting both groups, wherever possible, can create long lasting and meaningful change in current agricultural practices. This review examines the most recent literature on pollinator competition and the common threats that drive it. It also delves into the social elements of beekeeping and examines the potential for beekeepers to contribute to the protection of natural habitats. Beekeepers have a genuine interest to preserve natural space and with their charismatic species, dutiful observations, and innovative techniques, they can be valuable assets in filling knowledge gaps and generating public interest. Pollinator strategies in the future should include beekeepers as key stakeholders if their impacts are to be improved.
人人为我,我为人人:蜜蜂和野生授粉昆虫面临的共同风险及养蜂人在保护中的益处综述
全球授粉昆虫减少的主要原因是密集使用土地、杀虫剂和气候变化之间的协同作用。管理的授粉昆虫与野生授粉昆虫之间的竞争已成为一个日益重要的研究课题,然而随之而来的社会冲突却在养蜂人和保护主义者之间形成了对立,而这两方都希望保护授粉昆虫的自然多样性。对管理蜜蜂和野生物种来说,造成这种潜在竞争的威胁是真实存在的,只要有可能,将这两个群体联合起来,就能对当前的农业实践进行长期而有意义的变革。本综述研究了有关授粉者竞争和导致竞争的常见威胁的最新文献。它还深入探讨了养蜂业的社会因素,并研究了养蜂人为保护自然栖息地做出贡献的潜力。养蜂人对保护自然空间有着真正的兴趣,他们拥有极具魅力的物种、尽职尽责的观察和创新的技术,可以成为填补知识空白和激发公众兴趣的宝贵财富。未来的授粉者战略应将养蜂人作为主要利益相关者,这样才能改善其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书