An Exploration of the Impact of Cognitive, Meta-cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding on EFL Students Oral Production in Asia Context

Qiuyun Wang
{"title":"An Exploration of the Impact of Cognitive, Meta-cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding on EFL Students Oral Production in Asia Context","authors":"Qiuyun Wang","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/43/20240856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the efficiency of three types of scaffolding (cognitive, meta-cognitive and motivational scaffolding) in boosting English as Foreign Language (EFL) university students speaking motivation and proficiency in the context of Asia. To this end, this study is carried out by reviewing and synthesizing previous literature and empiric work. It is found out that each type of scaffolding is effective in improving learners oral production. However, an ambiguous classification between these three scaffolds, in terms of their operational definitions, would made it hard to measure the extent to which students speaking performance can be influenced by each type of scaffold alone. Hence, the answer to which type of scaffold is the most effective is inconclusive. In addition, the exploration of the motivational scaffold framework aimed to focus on learners emotional needs is in progress, yet a much more significant amount of studies and empirical work about this type of scaffold will be needed, in terms of investigating its impact on students both cognitive and affective aspects. Finally, no current research empirically investigated the impact of these scaffolds on students speaking motivation; instead only a fragment of descriptive comments can be found in a few studies.","PeriodicalId":474531,"journal":{"name":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/43/20240856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examined the efficiency of three types of scaffolding (cognitive, meta-cognitive and motivational scaffolding) in boosting English as Foreign Language (EFL) university students speaking motivation and proficiency in the context of Asia. To this end, this study is carried out by reviewing and synthesizing previous literature and empiric work. It is found out that each type of scaffolding is effective in improving learners oral production. However, an ambiguous classification between these three scaffolds, in terms of their operational definitions, would made it hard to measure the extent to which students speaking performance can be influenced by each type of scaffold alone. Hence, the answer to which type of scaffold is the most effective is inconclusive. In addition, the exploration of the motivational scaffold framework aimed to focus on learners emotional needs is in progress, yet a much more significant amount of studies and empirical work about this type of scaffold will be needed, in terms of investigating its impact on students both cognitive and affective aspects. Finally, no current research empirically investigated the impact of these scaffolds on students speaking motivation; instead only a fragment of descriptive comments can be found in a few studies.
认知、元认知和动机支架对亚洲语境下英语语言学生口语表达的影响探究
本文以亚洲为背景,研究了三种支架(认知支架、元认知支架和动机支架)在提高英语作为外语(EFL)的大学生口语动机和水平方面的效率。为此,本研究对以往的文献和实证工作进行了回顾和总结。研究发现,每种类型的支架都能有效提高学习者的口语水平。然而,由于这三种支架在操作定义上的分类不明确,因此很难衡量每种支架对学生口语表现的影响程度。因此,哪种支架最有效尚无定论。此外,旨在关注学习者情感需求的动机支架框架的探索正在进行中,但还需要对这类支架进行更大量的研究和实证工作,以调查其对学生认知和情感两方面的影响。最后,目前还没有研究对这些支架对学生口语学习动机的影响进行实证调查;相反,只能在一些研究中找到零星的描述性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信