Imidacloprid Uptake and Leaching in the Critical Root Zone of a Florida Entisol

Q. O. Uthman, Miguel Vasconez, D. Kadyampakeni, Yu Wang, Demetris Athienitis, J. Qureshi
{"title":"Imidacloprid Uptake and Leaching in the Critical Root Zone of a Florida Entisol","authors":"Q. O. Uthman, Miguel Vasconez, D. Kadyampakeni, Yu Wang, Demetris Athienitis, J. Qureshi","doi":"10.3390/agrochemicals3010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imidacloprid (IDP) products are applied via soil drenching in the citrus critical root zone (CCRZ) at 0–60 cm soil depth. This study aimed to determine the uptake and leaching of IDP in the CCRZ of a Florida Entisol. The treatments include: (1) a control with no IDP applied, (2) 1.6 g of active ingredient (a.i.) per tree (×2), and (3) 3.2 g a.i. per tree of IDP (×4). The treatments were applied to two trees within each experiment unit, replicated five times, and completely randomized. The IDP concentration in the Entisol was affected by the amount of water received within the sampling intervals. IDP movement in the Entisol was evident for the field trials in Fall 2021 and 2022, irrespective of the treatment. A total of 10 mm of daily irrigation was the major driver of IDP movement in Fall 2021 (September–December 2021), while 11.7 cm of cumulative rainfall plus 10 mm of daily irrigation were the major drivers for IDP in Fall 2022 (November–December 2022). The IDP uptake level by leaves was relatively low probably because of the relatively low temperature and humidity. More applications of IDP did not result in its higher uptake by citrus leaves in the Entisol. Given the persistence of IDP, there is a possibility of leaching, which could potentially contaminate the groundwater, surface water, and non-target organisms. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully manage the use of IDP in citrus production systems to mitigate the unintended environmental impacts.","PeriodicalId":502241,"journal":{"name":"Agrochemicals","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrochemicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals3010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imidacloprid (IDP) products are applied via soil drenching in the citrus critical root zone (CCRZ) at 0–60 cm soil depth. This study aimed to determine the uptake and leaching of IDP in the CCRZ of a Florida Entisol. The treatments include: (1) a control with no IDP applied, (2) 1.6 g of active ingredient (a.i.) per tree (×2), and (3) 3.2 g a.i. per tree of IDP (×4). The treatments were applied to two trees within each experiment unit, replicated five times, and completely randomized. The IDP concentration in the Entisol was affected by the amount of water received within the sampling intervals. IDP movement in the Entisol was evident for the field trials in Fall 2021 and 2022, irrespective of the treatment. A total of 10 mm of daily irrigation was the major driver of IDP movement in Fall 2021 (September–December 2021), while 11.7 cm of cumulative rainfall plus 10 mm of daily irrigation were the major drivers for IDP in Fall 2022 (November–December 2022). The IDP uptake level by leaves was relatively low probably because of the relatively low temperature and humidity. More applications of IDP did not result in its higher uptake by citrus leaves in the Entisol. Given the persistence of IDP, there is a possibility of leaching, which could potentially contaminate the groundwater, surface water, and non-target organisms. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully manage the use of IDP in citrus production systems to mitigate the unintended environmental impacts.
佛罗里达州 Entisol 植物临界根区对吡虫啉的吸收和沥滤
吡虫啉(IDP)产品通过土壤淋洗施用在柑橘临界根区(CCRZ)0-60 厘米的土壤深度。本研究旨在确定 IDP 在佛罗里达州 Entisol 的 CCRZ 中的吸收和沥滤情况。处理包括(1)未施用 IDP 的对照;(2)每棵树施用 1.6 克活性成分 (a.i.)(×2);(3)每棵树施用 3.2 克活性成分 (a.i.)(×4)。每个实验单元内的两棵树施用这些处理,重复五次,完全随机。Entisol 中的 IDP 浓度受采样间隔内的水量影响。在 2021 年和 2022 年秋季的田间试验中,无论采用哪种处理方法, Entisol 中的 IDP 移动都很明显。在2021年秋季(2021年9月至12月),每天10毫米的总灌溉量是IDP移动的主要驱动力,而在2022年秋季(2022年11月至12月),11.7厘米的累积降雨量加上10毫米的每天灌溉量是IDP的主要驱动力。可能由于温度和湿度相对较低,叶片对 IDP 的吸收水平相对较低。施用更多的 IDP 并没有提高 Entisol 中柑橘叶片对 IDP 的吸收。鉴于 IDP 的持久性,存在沥滤的可能性,这可能会污染地下水、地表水和非目标生物。因此,在柑橘生产系统中谨慎管理 IDP 的使用以减轻对环境的意外影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信