The Effect of Padlet-assisted Flipped Classroom Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability

Ika Puspitasari, Shokhibul Arifin
{"title":"The Effect of Padlet-assisted Flipped Classroom Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability","authors":"Ika Puspitasari, Shokhibul Arifin","doi":"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to compare the flipped classroom learning model assisted by Padlet and the blended learning model on critical thinking skills. The problem that will be studied is whether there are differences in the two dimensions of the learning model regarding critical thinking abilities. In this study, the independent variable (X) is the flipped classroom learning model assisted by Padlet. Meanwhile, the dependent variable (Y) is critical thinking. The research sample was taken from students at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surabaya. The research sample was taken from students who were normally distributed, had the same characteristics (homogeneous), and had the same average value. Then two groups (classes) were taken as samples two experimental group classes used a flipped class learning model assisted by padlet and two control group classes used a blended learning model. The data analysis technique used is the independent sample T-test statistical analysis technique. With a significance level of 0.05. The resulting Sig value is known. (2-tailed) of 0.025. The results show that there are differences in critical thinking abilities between the flipped classroom learning model, assisted by Padlet, and the blended learning model.","PeriodicalId":502349,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to compare the flipped classroom learning model assisted by Padlet and the blended learning model on critical thinking skills. The problem that will be studied is whether there are differences in the two dimensions of the learning model regarding critical thinking abilities. In this study, the independent variable (X) is the flipped classroom learning model assisted by Padlet. Meanwhile, the dependent variable (Y) is critical thinking. The research sample was taken from students at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surabaya. The research sample was taken from students who were normally distributed, had the same characteristics (homogeneous), and had the same average value. Then two groups (classes) were taken as samples two experimental group classes used a flipped class learning model assisted by padlet and two control group classes used a blended learning model. The data analysis technique used is the independent sample T-test statistical analysis technique. With a significance level of 0.05. The resulting Sig value is known. (2-tailed) of 0.025. The results show that there are differences in critical thinking abilities between the flipped classroom learning model, assisted by Padlet, and the blended learning model.
Padlet 辅助翻转课堂学习模式对批判性思维能力的影响
本研究旨在比较由 Padlet 辅助的翻转课堂学习模式和混合式学习模式在批判性思维能力方面的差异。要研究的问题是,两种学习模式在批判性思维能力方面是否存在差异。在本研究中,自变量(X)是 Padlet 辅助的翻转课堂学习模式。同时,因变量(Y)是批判性思维。研究样本来自泗水 SMA Muhammadiyah 1 的学生。研究样本取自正态分布、具有相同特征(同质)和相同平均值的学生。然后以两个小组(班级)为样本,两个实验组班级使用 padlet 辅助的翻转课堂学习模式,两个对照组班级使用混合学习模式。采用的数据分析技术是独立样本 T 检验统计分析技术。显著性水平为 0.05。得出的 Sig 值为(双尾)为 0.025。结果表明,在 Padlet 的辅助下,翻转课堂学习模式与混合式学习模式在批判性思维能力方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信