Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy

Beate Sjåfjell, Jukka Mähönen
{"title":"Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy","authors":"Beate Sjåfjell, Jukka Mähönen","doi":"10.53300/001c.94050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the heated debates ever since the European Commission launched its Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative in 2020. In this debate, shareholder primacy proponents have sought to frame the discussion within what we call a shareholder v stakeholder dichotomy. The dichotomy is misleading and dangerous in the way it takes company law proper out of the discussion and reinforces the shareholder primacy drive. We reject the dichotomy as a meaningful framing of the debate and seek to dismantle some of the strawmen set up on the road towards sustainable corporate governance. We instead discuss corporate purpose as a matter of company law and relevant to ensuring the contribution of business to sustainability, and how such an overarching purpose could be operationalised with a redefinition of duties of the board. With this backdrop, we analyse the Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative, concentrating on company law and sustainability aspects of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.","PeriodicalId":33279,"journal":{"name":"Bond Law Review","volume":"10 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the heated debates ever since the European Commission launched its Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative in 2020. In this debate, shareholder primacy proponents have sought to frame the discussion within what we call a shareholder v stakeholder dichotomy. The dichotomy is misleading and dangerous in the way it takes company law proper out of the discussion and reinforces the shareholder primacy drive. We reject the dichotomy as a meaningful framing of the debate and seek to dismantle some of the strawmen set up on the road towards sustainable corporate governance. We instead discuss corporate purpose as a matter of company law and relevant to ensuring the contribution of business to sustainability, and how such an overarching purpose could be operationalised with a redefinition of duties of the board. With this backdrop, we analyse the Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative, concentrating on company law and sustainability aspects of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.
企业宗旨和误导性的股东与利益相关者二分法
公司宗旨再次成为公司法和公司治理中的一个讨论话题。在欧盟,自欧盟委员会于 2020 年发起 "可持续公司治理 "倡议以来,历史悠久的社会性公司治理方法与历史更短(基础更薄弱)的效率性公司治理方法之间的矛盾在激烈的辩论中显而易见。在这场辩论中,股东至上的支持者试图将讨论归结为股东与利益相关者的二分法。这种二分法具有误导性和危险性,因为它将公司法本身排除在讨论之外,强化了股东至上的驱动力。我们反对将二分法作为一种有意义的辩论框架,并试图拆除在实现可持续公司治理道路上设置的一些稻草人。取而代之的是,我们讨论作为公司法事项的公司宗旨,以及与确保企业对可持续发展的贡献相关的公司宗旨,并讨论如何通过重新定义董事会的职责来实现这一总体宗旨。在此背景下,我们对可持续公司治理倡议进行了分析,重点是拟议的《公司可持续性尽职调查指令》中的公司法和可持续性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信