The Perceived Inequalities in Resource Allocation in Multi-Campus Universities in Ghana: The Case of University for Development Studies and Presbyterian University of Ghana

A. Dinye, Emmanuel K. Boon, Priscilla Azumah Ageboba
{"title":"The Perceived Inequalities in Resource Allocation in Multi-Campus Universities in Ghana: The Case of University for Development Studies and Presbyterian University of Ghana","authors":"A. Dinye, Emmanuel K. Boon, Priscilla Azumah Ageboba","doi":"10.58806/ijirme.2024.v3i3n12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined and compared the resource allocation mechanisms in two multi-campus universities (MCUs) in Ghana. They are University for Development Studies (UDS) and Presbyterian University College, Ghana (PUCG), now known as Presbyterian University, Ghana (PUG). The main objective of the study was to investigate the perceived inequalities in the allocation of resources among the various campuses of the two Universities. The qualitative method, comparative case study approach and in-depth interview techniques were used to conduct the research. In all, eight senior management members (Pro Vice-Chancellors; Registrars; and Campus Heads) of the two Universities were purposively selected and interviewed. The findings revealed that these Universities do not have an established formula for the allocation of infrastructural and human resources for their respective campuses. It was also found that they use some percentages/ratios-based formula for the allocation of funds to the campuses. The paper recommends that physical infrastructure and human resources should be allocated based on deficits identified thorough need assessments. Secondly, to ensure a fair allocation of funds to the various campuses of the two universities, the deployment of a standardised mathematical formula is recommended.","PeriodicalId":183155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education","volume":"4 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2024.v3i3n12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examined and compared the resource allocation mechanisms in two multi-campus universities (MCUs) in Ghana. They are University for Development Studies (UDS) and Presbyterian University College, Ghana (PUCG), now known as Presbyterian University, Ghana (PUG). The main objective of the study was to investigate the perceived inequalities in the allocation of resources among the various campuses of the two Universities. The qualitative method, comparative case study approach and in-depth interview techniques were used to conduct the research. In all, eight senior management members (Pro Vice-Chancellors; Registrars; and Campus Heads) of the two Universities were purposively selected and interviewed. The findings revealed that these Universities do not have an established formula for the allocation of infrastructural and human resources for their respective campuses. It was also found that they use some percentages/ratios-based formula for the allocation of funds to the campuses. The paper recommends that physical infrastructure and human resources should be allocated based on deficits identified thorough need assessments. Secondly, to ensure a fair allocation of funds to the various campuses of the two universities, the deployment of a standardised mathematical formula is recommended.
加纳多校区大学在资源分配方面的不平等感:加纳发展研究大学和长老会大学的案例
本文研究并比较了加纳两所多校区大学(MCU)的资源分配机制。这两所大学是发展研究大学(UDS)和加纳长老会大学学院(PUCG),现更名为加纳长老会大学(PUG)。研究的主要目的是调查这两所大学各校区在资源分配方面存在的不平等现象。研究采用了定性方法、比较案例研究法和深入访谈技术。研究人员有目的地选取了两所大学的八名高级管理人员(副校长、教务长和校区负责人)进行访谈。研究结果表明,这两所大学在分配各自校园的基础设施和人力资源方面没有既定的公式。调查结果还发现,他们使用一些基于百分比/比例的公式来为各校区分配资金。本文建议,物质基础设施和人力资源应根据需求评估确定的赤字进行分配。其次,为确保向两所大学的各个校区公平分配资金,建议采用标准化的数学公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信