Implementation of geometric morphometry in the study of shapes of Bronze Age sickles from the Volga-Ural region

E. V. Bersenev, I. Bakhshiev
{"title":"Implementation of geometric morphometry in the study of shapes of Bronze Age sickles from the Volga-Ural region","authors":"E. V. Bersenev, I. Bakhshiev","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2024-64-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at evaluating the potential of geometric morphometry by means of an example of analysis of shapes of the Bronze Age sickles from the Volga-Ural region, as compared with the traditional morphometric approach. For the study, cast bronze sickles with hooks, categorized by V.A. Dergachev and V.S. Bochkarev into the Ibrakaevo, Derbeden, Perelyub and Yavlenka types using the traditional morphometric approach, have been selected. The analysis was applied to only full drawings of the items, including reconstructed ones, while fragmented items were not considered. The sample constitutes 167 objects: 86 Ibrakaevo, 49 Derbeden, 24 Perelyub, and 8 of the Yavlenka type. Application of geometric morphometry tools shows that, within the sample, three main forms can be easily identified, with the exception of the sickles earlier attributed to the Yavlenka type, probably due to their small number. Prepara-tion of primary files for recording landmark coordinates and processing of files with recorded coordinates were carried out in the tpsUtil program. The analysis of characteristics of changes of the forms was carried out using the principal component method in the MorphoJ program. Summarizing the obtained results, we can say that the principal components method has been able to identify three main variations of the objects. Most clear are the differences between the Ibrakaevo and Derbeden types, which show virtually no overlap. An intermediate position between them is taken by the Perelyub type, which is also distinctively grouped in the graph being close to the Ibrakaev group. In terms of identifying individual types, the results of the study are rather consistent with the data obtained by the tradi-tional morphometry. At the same time, it is possible to trace the vectors of shape variability for all types of tools based on three main components. Overall, it can be concluded that the method of geometric morphometry demonstrates its efficiency for the analysis of shapes of metal sickles and in future it could be applied to wider sample groups.","PeriodicalId":506530,"journal":{"name":"VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII","volume":"22 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2024-64-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims at evaluating the potential of geometric morphometry by means of an example of analysis of shapes of the Bronze Age sickles from the Volga-Ural region, as compared with the traditional morphometric approach. For the study, cast bronze sickles with hooks, categorized by V.A. Dergachev and V.S. Bochkarev into the Ibrakaevo, Derbeden, Perelyub and Yavlenka types using the traditional morphometric approach, have been selected. The analysis was applied to only full drawings of the items, including reconstructed ones, while fragmented items were not considered. The sample constitutes 167 objects: 86 Ibrakaevo, 49 Derbeden, 24 Perelyub, and 8 of the Yavlenka type. Application of geometric morphometry tools shows that, within the sample, three main forms can be easily identified, with the exception of the sickles earlier attributed to the Yavlenka type, probably due to their small number. Prepara-tion of primary files for recording landmark coordinates and processing of files with recorded coordinates were carried out in the tpsUtil program. The analysis of characteristics of changes of the forms was carried out using the principal component method in the MorphoJ program. Summarizing the obtained results, we can say that the principal components method has been able to identify three main variations of the objects. Most clear are the differences between the Ibrakaevo and Derbeden types, which show virtually no overlap. An intermediate position between them is taken by the Perelyub type, which is also distinctively grouped in the graph being close to the Ibrakaev group. In terms of identifying individual types, the results of the study are rather consistent with the data obtained by the tradi-tional morphometry. At the same time, it is possible to trace the vectors of shape variability for all types of tools based on three main components. Overall, it can be concluded that the method of geometric morphometry demonstrates its efficiency for the analysis of shapes of metal sickles and in future it could be applied to wider sample groups.
在研究伏尔加-乌拉尔地区青铜时代镰刀形状时采用几何形态测量法
本文旨在通过分析伏尔加-乌拉尔地区青铜时代镰刀形状的实例,与传统的形态计量学方法进行比较,评估几何形态计量学的潜力。研究选择了带钩的铸铜镰刀,这些镰刀被 V.A. Dergachev 和 V.S. Bochkarev 用传统的形态测量法分为 Ibrakaevo、Derbeden、Perelyub 和 Yavlenka 类型。分析只适用于物品的完整图纸,包括重建的图纸,而不考虑残缺不全的物品。样本包括 167 件文物:86件易布拉卡耶沃(Ibrakaevo)、49件德尔贝登(Derbeden)、24件佩雷柳布(Perelyub)和8件亚夫连卡(Yavlenka)类型。几何形态测量工具的应用表明,在样本中,可以很容易地识别出三种主要形式,但早先归属于亚夫连卡类型的镰刀除外,这可能是由于其数量较少的缘故。在 tpsUtil 程序中准备了记录地标坐标的原始文件,并对记录坐标的文件进行了处理。在 MorphoJ 程序中使用主成分法对形态变化特征进行了分析。总结所获得的结果,我们可以说主成分法能够确定物体的三种主要变化。最明显的是 Ibrakaevo 型和 Derbeden 型之间的差异,这两种类型几乎没有重叠。介于两者之间的是佩列柳布类型,它在图中的分组也很明显,与伊布拉卡耶夫类型接近。在确定单个类型方面,研究结果与传统形态测量法获得的数据相当一致。同时,还可以根据三个主要组成部分追踪所有类型工具的形状变异向量。总之,可以得出结论,几何形态测量法证明了其在分析金属镰刀形状方面的效率,将来可以应用于更广泛的样本组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信