F. Boele, L. Rosenlund, S. Nordentoft, Sara Melhuish, E. Nicklin, I. Rydén, A. Williamson, M. Donders-Kamphuis, M. Preusser, E. Le Rhun, B. Kiesel, G. Minniti, J. Furtner, L. Dirven, M. Taphoorn, N. Galldiks, R. Rudà, A. Chalmers, Susan C Short, K. Piil
{"title":"Inequalities in access to neuro-oncology supportive care and rehabilitation: a survey of healthcare professionals’ perspectives","authors":"F. Boele, L. Rosenlund, S. Nordentoft, Sara Melhuish, E. Nicklin, I. Rydén, A. Williamson, M. Donders-Kamphuis, M. Preusser, E. Le Rhun, B. Kiesel, G. Minniti, J. Furtner, L. Dirven, M. Taphoorn, N. Galldiks, R. Rudà, A. Chalmers, Susan C Short, K. Piil","doi":"10.1093/nop/npae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Neuro-oncology patients and caregivers should have equitable access to rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care. To investigate existing issues and potential solutions, we surveyed neuro-oncology professionals to explore current barriers and facilitators to screening patients’ needs and referral to services.\n \n \n \n Members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-BTG) were invited to complete a 39-item online questionnaire covering availability of services, screening and referral practice. Responses were analyzed descriptively; associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and screening/referral practice were explored.\n \n \n \n In total, 103 participants completed the survey (67% women; 57% medical doctors). Fifteen professions from 23 countries were represented. Various rehabilitation, supportive- and palliative care services were available yet rated ‘inadequate’ by 21-37% of participants. Most respondents with a clinical role (n=94) declare to screen (78%) and to refer (83%) their patients routinely for physical/cognitive/emotional issues. Survey completers (n=103) indicated the main reasons for not screening/referring were 1) lack of suitable referral options (50%); 2) shortage of healthcare professionals (48%); 3) long waiting lists (42%). To improve service provision, respondents suggested there is a need for education about neuro-oncology specific issues (75%), improving availability of services (65%) and staff (64%), developing international guidelines (64%), and strengthening the existing evidence-base for rehabilitation (60%).\n \n \n \n Detecting and managing neuro-oncology patients’ and caregivers’ rehabilitation, supportive- and palliative care needs can be improved. Better international collaboration can help address healthcare disparities.\n","PeriodicalId":506567,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","volume":"23 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neuro-oncology patients and caregivers should have equitable access to rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care. To investigate existing issues and potential solutions, we surveyed neuro-oncology professionals to explore current barriers and facilitators to screening patients’ needs and referral to services.
Members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-BTG) were invited to complete a 39-item online questionnaire covering availability of services, screening and referral practice. Responses were analyzed descriptively; associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and screening/referral practice were explored.
In total, 103 participants completed the survey (67% women; 57% medical doctors). Fifteen professions from 23 countries were represented. Various rehabilitation, supportive- and palliative care services were available yet rated ‘inadequate’ by 21-37% of participants. Most respondents with a clinical role (n=94) declare to screen (78%) and to refer (83%) their patients routinely for physical/cognitive/emotional issues. Survey completers (n=103) indicated the main reasons for not screening/referring were 1) lack of suitable referral options (50%); 2) shortage of healthcare professionals (48%); 3) long waiting lists (42%). To improve service provision, respondents suggested there is a need for education about neuro-oncology specific issues (75%), improving availability of services (65%) and staff (64%), developing international guidelines (64%), and strengthening the existing evidence-base for rehabilitation (60%).
Detecting and managing neuro-oncology patients’ and caregivers’ rehabilitation, supportive- and palliative care needs can be improved. Better international collaboration can help address healthcare disparities.