Etyka administracji publicznej a funkcja edukacyjna sądów administracyjnych – glosa częściowo krytyczna do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z 15 lipca 2021 r., sygn. akt III OSK 3869/21

Arkadiusz Jaworski
{"title":"Etyka administracji publicznej a funkcja edukacyjna sądów administracyjnych – glosa częściowo krytyczna do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z 15 lipca 2021 r., sygn. akt III OSK 3869/21","authors":"Arkadiusz Jaworski","doi":"10.14746/spp.2024.1.45.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This gloss discusses two, at first glance imperceptible, problems that are concentrated in the ruling analyzed. The first of these is the practical application of ethical principles by public administration bodies. In the case being commented on – submitting an application for a school scholarship beyond the statutory deadline – the public administration authorities not only failed to fulfill their obligations related to the fair consideration of the case, but also to provide protection to a family in a difficult life situation. Such protection is guaranteed not only by statutes, including the Code of Administrative Procedure, but also by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and international agreements binding on Poland. The Supreme Administrative Court’s judgment focused primarily on the analysis of the provisions of the Education System Act, without paying much attention to the above-mentioned problem of standards that should guide public administration. In the author’s opinion, such a way of considering the case, which ignores the broader context of the primary causes of the entire problem, should be considered as a serious omission. In the light of the fundamental role of the courts in protecting the fundamental rights of the individual, as well as the influence of case law on shaping the legal culture of public authorities and society, the duty of the court – especially the court of last instance – is to provide a detailed explanation of all doubts that have arisen in a given case and a comprehensive justification of the reasons for a given decision. The goal that the court should strive for is not only to uphold and promote certain standards or maintain the uniformity of case law, but also to ensure that both the parties and all other recipients of the judgment have no or the least possible doubts as to the correctness of the judgment. All this significantly affects the authority of the judiciary and the trust of citizens in it, and thus to some extent, also their faith in the entire public authority in Poland.\n ","PeriodicalId":176818,"journal":{"name":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","volume":"13 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/spp.2024.1.45.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This gloss discusses two, at first glance imperceptible, problems that are concentrated in the ruling analyzed. The first of these is the practical application of ethical principles by public administration bodies. In the case being commented on – submitting an application for a school scholarship beyond the statutory deadline – the public administration authorities not only failed to fulfill their obligations related to the fair consideration of the case, but also to provide protection to a family in a difficult life situation. Such protection is guaranteed not only by statutes, including the Code of Administrative Procedure, but also by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and international agreements binding on Poland. The Supreme Administrative Court’s judgment focused primarily on the analysis of the provisions of the Education System Act, without paying much attention to the above-mentioned problem of standards that should guide public administration. In the author’s opinion, such a way of considering the case, which ignores the broader context of the primary causes of the entire problem, should be considered as a serious omission. In the light of the fundamental role of the courts in protecting the fundamental rights of the individual, as well as the influence of case law on shaping the legal culture of public authorities and society, the duty of the court – especially the court of last instance – is to provide a detailed explanation of all doubts that have arisen in a given case and a comprehensive justification of the reasons for a given decision. The goal that the court should strive for is not only to uphold and promote certain standards or maintain the uniformity of case law, but also to ensure that both the parties and all other recipients of the judgment have no or the least possible doubts as to the correctness of the judgment. All this significantly affects the authority of the judiciary and the trust of citizens in it, and thus to some extent, also their faith in the entire public authority in Poland.  
公共行政伦理与行政法院的教育职能--对最高行政法院 2021 年 7 月 15 日判决的部分评论,编号:III OSK 3869/21
本文讨论了两个乍看之下难以察觉的问题,这些问题集中体现在对执政的分析上。第一个问题是公共行政机构对道德原则的实际应用。在所评论的案件中--在法定期限之外提交学校奖学金申请--公共行政机关不仅没有履行其与公平审理案件有关的义务,而且也没有为一个生活困难的家庭提供保护。这种保护不仅受到《行政诉讼法》等法规的保障,也受到《波兰共和国宪法》和对波兰有约束力的国际协定的保障。最高行政法院的判决主要侧重于对《教育系统法》条款的分析,而没有过多地关注上述应指导公共行政的标准问题。作者认为,这种忽视整个问题主要原因的大背景的审理方式应被视为严重的疏忽。鉴于法院在保护个人基本权利方面的基本作用,以及判例法在塑造公共当局和社会法律文化方面的影响,法院--尤其是终审法院--的职责是详细解释特定案件中出现的所有疑点,并全面说明特定判决的理由。法院应努力实现的目标不仅是维护和促进某些标准或保持判例法的统一性,而且还要确保当事人和判决的所有其他接收者对判决的正确性没有或尽可能少地产生疑问。所有这些都极大地影响了司法机构的权威和公民对司法机构的信任,从而在一定程度上影响了公民对波兰整个公共权力机构的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信