A comparison of one point versus two point fixation in the management of zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures

Prajwal K Bharadwaj, A. Patel K N, Girish Gowda, P. Bhat, Sindhu Iyengar
{"title":"A comparison of one point versus two point fixation in the management of zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures","authors":"Prajwal K Bharadwaj, A. Patel K N, Girish Gowda, P. Bhat, Sindhu Iyengar","doi":"10.18231/j.jooo.2024.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are highly frequent injuries. There is a variety of operative techniques for fixation of ZMC fractures, with no consensus about the best technique. We aim to compare one-point versus two-point fixation of tripodal zygomatic fractures. This study was carried out on 34 patients admitted to the trauma unit in Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedics in the period from September 2022 to August 2023. Patients were divided into two groups (group 1; one-point fixation, and group 2; two- point fixation). When compared to the one-point fixation group, only 14 patients had substantial stability with a P-value of <0.05 being statistically significant. In contrast, nearly all patients in the two-point fixation group had higher stability. In the two-point fixation group, nearly all patients had a post-operative scar; in the one-point fixation group, however, only two patients had the same scar, and the mouth opening was also improved. In two-point fixation, paraesthesia was observed in nearly seven patients, while in one-point fixation, it was present in only two patients.The one-point fixation technique for tripodal ZMC fractures is considered effective as the two-point fixation technique; and it offers advantages of scarless operation, reduced operation time, fewer complications, and lower cost.","PeriodicalId":509247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2024.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are highly frequent injuries. There is a variety of operative techniques for fixation of ZMC fractures, with no consensus about the best technique. We aim to compare one-point versus two-point fixation of tripodal zygomatic fractures. This study was carried out on 34 patients admitted to the trauma unit in Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedics in the period from September 2022 to August 2023. Patients were divided into two groups (group 1; one-point fixation, and group 2; two- point fixation). When compared to the one-point fixation group, only 14 patients had substantial stability with a P-value of <0.05 being statistically significant. In contrast, nearly all patients in the two-point fixation group had higher stability. In the two-point fixation group, nearly all patients had a post-operative scar; in the one-point fixation group, however, only two patients had the same scar, and the mouth opening was also improved. In two-point fixation, paraesthesia was observed in nearly seven patients, while in one-point fixation, it was present in only two patients.The one-point fixation technique for tripodal ZMC fractures is considered effective as the two-point fixation technique; and it offers advantages of scarless operation, reduced operation time, fewer complications, and lower cost.
在治疗颧骨-下颌骨复合体骨折时采用一点固定与两点固定的比较
颧骨颌面复合体(ZMC)骨折是一种高发伤。目前有多种固定颧骨颌面复合体骨折的手术技术,但对最佳技术尚未达成共识。我们旨在比较三足颧骨骨折的一点固定和两点固定。这项研究的对象是 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 8 月期间入住桑贾伊-甘地创伤和骨科研究所创伤科的 34 名患者。患者被分为两组(第一组:单点固定,第二组:两点固定)。与单点固定组相比,仅有 14 名患者具有实质性稳定性,P 值小于 0.05 具有统计学意义。相比之下,两点固定组几乎所有患者的稳定性都较高。在两点固定组中,几乎所有患者术后都有疤痕;而在一点固定组中,只有两名患者有同样的疤痕,而且张口情况也有所改善。在两点固定中,近七名患者出现了副痛,而在一点固定中,只有两名患者出现了副痛。三足颧骨骨折的一点固定技术与两点固定技术一样有效,而且具有无疤痕、手术时间短、并发症少、费用低等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信