Monocytes and Fibrinogen as Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

M. Crisci, Fabiana Flagiello, Giovanni Lepore, Federica Feleppa, A. Crisci
{"title":"Monocytes and Fibrinogen as Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"M. Crisci, Fabiana Flagiello, Giovanni Lepore, Federica Feleppa, A. Crisci","doi":"10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i03-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the diagnosis of diabetic foot, in addition to the inflammatory biomarkers that have been widely interested and used, for example procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), ESR, leukocyte count, neutrophil count, Fibrinogen and Monocytes are considered as biomarkers in this study. possible. Methods: A prospective study was designed to examine the utility of fibrinogen and monocytes in estimating disease severity in patients with DFU (Diabetic Foot Ulcer). The severity of DFU was assessed using the Wagner criteria distinguishing between patients with diabetic foot without ulcer (WDFU) and with non-infected diabetic foot ulcer (NIDFU) or with infected ulcer (IDFU). In this study the AA also wanted to correlate HbA1c to the concentration of Fibrinogen and the appearance of DFU, as well as the level of lymphocytes and monocyte precursors of macrophages in the evolution of ulcerated and non-ulcerated diabetic feet. Results: Mean blood fibrinogen values were significantly higher in patients with DFU grade ≧2 compared to those with DFU grade ≤1 (424.4±138.8 mg/dL versus 395.3±130.0 mg/dL; p=0.091). Fibrinogen values were correlated with CRP levels, neutrophils, ESR and leukocyte count. Monocytes presented a significant difference between non-diabetic patients with ulcer and without ulcer (0.41 vs 0.29 k/L; p=0.000) and between the diabetic without ulcer (WDFU) and non-diabetic without ulcer (NDWU) groups (0.39 vs 0.29 k/L; p=0.000). The Procalcitonin (PCT) value was <0.5 ng/dl, therefore it had no diagnostic significance. Only 1% of the values found were higher than 0.5 with an average of 1.04 ng/dl (range: 0.52-2.5). Conclusions: Neither monocytes nor HbA1c can be considered biomarkers for the risk of ulcer formation in the diabetic foot, but only as biomarkers of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Differently, fibrinogenemia, its pre/post intervention ratio, the  angle and the k value of thromboelastography (TEG), have a clinical significance on the risk of onset and development of ulcerated diabetic foot. The cut-off for ulcer formation for both the pre/post intervention ratio of fibrinogenemia and monocythemia is 1.10, with a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 24.5% for fibrinogen and 93.8% and 14.8% for monocytes.","PeriodicalId":502774,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES","volume":"60 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i03-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the diagnosis of diabetic foot, in addition to the inflammatory biomarkers that have been widely interested and used, for example procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), ESR, leukocyte count, neutrophil count, Fibrinogen and Monocytes are considered as biomarkers in this study. possible. Methods: A prospective study was designed to examine the utility of fibrinogen and monocytes in estimating disease severity in patients with DFU (Diabetic Foot Ulcer). The severity of DFU was assessed using the Wagner criteria distinguishing between patients with diabetic foot without ulcer (WDFU) and with non-infected diabetic foot ulcer (NIDFU) or with infected ulcer (IDFU). In this study the AA also wanted to correlate HbA1c to the concentration of Fibrinogen and the appearance of DFU, as well as the level of lymphocytes and monocyte precursors of macrophages in the evolution of ulcerated and non-ulcerated diabetic feet. Results: Mean blood fibrinogen values were significantly higher in patients with DFU grade ≧2 compared to those with DFU grade ≤1 (424.4±138.8 mg/dL versus 395.3±130.0 mg/dL; p=0.091). Fibrinogen values were correlated with CRP levels, neutrophils, ESR and leukocyte count. Monocytes presented a significant difference between non-diabetic patients with ulcer and without ulcer (0.41 vs 0.29 k/L; p=0.000) and between the diabetic without ulcer (WDFU) and non-diabetic without ulcer (NDWU) groups (0.39 vs 0.29 k/L; p=0.000). The Procalcitonin (PCT) value was <0.5 ng/dl, therefore it had no diagnostic significance. Only 1% of the values found were higher than 0.5 with an average of 1.04 ng/dl (range: 0.52-2.5). Conclusions: Neither monocytes nor HbA1c can be considered biomarkers for the risk of ulcer formation in the diabetic foot, but only as biomarkers of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Differently, fibrinogenemia, its pre/post intervention ratio, the  angle and the k value of thromboelastography (TEG), have a clinical significance on the risk of onset and development of ulcerated diabetic foot. The cut-off for ulcer formation for both the pre/post intervention ratio of fibrinogenemia and monocythemia is 1.10, with a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 24.5% for fibrinogen and 93.8% and 14.8% for monocytes.
作为 2 型糖尿病生物标志物的单核细胞和纤维蛋白原
背景:在糖尿病足的诊断中,除了已被广泛关注和使用的炎症生物标志物(如降钙素原、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血沉、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、纤维蛋白原和单核细胞)外,本研究还考虑了其他生物标志物。研究方法设计了一项前瞻性研究,以检验纤维蛋白原和单核细胞在估计 DFU(糖尿病足溃疡)患者疾病严重程度方面的效用。DFU 的严重程度采用瓦格纳标准进行评估,该标准将患者区分为无溃疡糖尿病足(WDFU)和非感染性糖尿病足溃疡(NIDFU)或感染性溃疡(IDFU)。在这项研究中,机管局还希望将 HbA1c 与纤维蛋白原的浓度、DFU 的出现以及溃疡性和非溃疡性糖尿病足演变过程中的淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞的单核前体水平联系起来。研究结果DFU ≧2级患者的平均血纤维蛋白原值明显高于DFU≤1级患者(424.4±138.8 mg/dL 对 395.3±130.0 mg/dL; p=0.091)。纤维蛋白原值与 CRP 水平、中性粒细胞、血沉和白细胞计数相关。单核细胞在有溃疡和无溃疡的非糖尿病患者之间存在明显差异(0.41 vs 0.29 k/L;p=0.000),在无溃疡的糖尿病组(WDFU)和无溃疡的非糖尿病组(NDWU)之间也存在明显差异(0.39 vs 0.29 k/L;p=0.000)。降钙素原(PCT)值小于 0.5 ng/dl,因此没有诊断意义。只有 1%的检测值高于 0.5,平均值为 1.04 ng/dl(范围:0.52-2.5)。结论单核细胞和 HbA1c 都不能作为糖尿病足溃疡形成风险的生物标志物,而只能作为 2 型糖尿病的生物标志物。与此不同的是,纤维蛋白原血症、干预前后比值、 角和血栓弹力图(TEG)的 k 值对糖尿病足溃疡的发生和发展风险具有临床意义。纤维蛋白原血症和单核细胞增多症干预前后比值的溃疡形成临界值为 1.10,纤维蛋白原的敏感性为 84.1%,特异性为 24.5%,单核细胞的敏感性为 93.8%,特异性为 14.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信