Welfare fragmented information effects: The cost-benefit analysis and Trade-offs

Emna Trabelsi
{"title":"Welfare fragmented information effects: The cost-benefit analysis and Trade-offs","authors":"Emna Trabelsi","doi":"10.58567/jie02010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 14pt;\">We offer an extensive analysis of the significance of information within the realm of Gaussian quadratic economies. We build upon the seminal papers of Morris and Shin (2002, 2007) and consider a signal game of incomplete information. Particularly, we question the suitability of partial transparency portrayed by fragmented information in addition to the private signal in terms of welfare effects. We can summarize our findings in two main points. First, fragmented information, in conjunction with a private signal, can reduce the reliance on public signals. Second, a conflicting effect arises between increasing full disclosure and increasing the precision of fragmented (semi-public) information when examining different complex scenarios, involving for example endogenous private information or imperfect correlated signals. For a critical threshold, an optimal communication strategy designed by fragmented information should be implemented whenever that kind of information is acquired at a high precision.</span></p>","PeriodicalId":470742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Economics","volume":"125 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Economics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We offer an extensive analysis of the significance of information within the realm of Gaussian quadratic economies. We build upon the seminal papers of Morris and Shin (2002, 2007) and consider a signal game of incomplete information. Particularly, we question the suitability of partial transparency portrayed by fragmented information in addition to the private signal in terms of welfare effects. We can summarize our findings in two main points. First, fragmented information, in conjunction with a private signal, can reduce the reliance on public signals. Second, a conflicting effect arises between increasing full disclosure and increasing the precision of fragmented (semi-public) information when examining different complex scenarios, involving for example endogenous private information or imperfect correlated signals. For a critical threshold, an optimal communication strategy designed by fragmented information should be implemented whenever that kind of information is acquired at a high precision.

福利碎片化信息效应:成本效益分析与权衡
我们对高斯二次经济中信息的重要性进行了广泛分析。我们以 Morris 和 Shin(2002,2007)的开创性论文为基础,考虑了不完全信息的信号博弈。特别是,除了私人信号之外,我们还质疑由碎片化信息描绘的部分透明度在福利效应方面是否合适。我们可以用两个要点来概括我们的发现。首先,碎片化信息与私人信号相结合,可以减少对公共信号的依赖。其次,在研究内生私人信息或不完全相关信号等不同的复杂情况时,增加全面披露与提高碎片化(半公开)信息的精确度之间会产生相互冲突的效应。就临界阈值而言,只要能高精度地获取碎片化信息,就应实施由碎片化信息设计的最佳传播策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信