Den teologiske andre

Joseph Sverker
{"title":"Den teologiske andre","authors":"Joseph Sverker","doi":"10.51619/stk.v100i1.26099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Religious Studies has a history of distancing itself from theology with the claim of being descriptive and theologically neutral. University theology, with reference here to Mårten Björk's recent article, on its part dis­tances itself against confessional theology. A norm-critical reading of these two claims makes clear that they are not substantiated. With Ingemar Hedenius as a starting point, it becomes clear that he assumes a particular view of \"faith\" as not entailing any extra type of knowledge, while this would be contested by theologians such as Augustine and Duns Scotus. What an awareness of the theological debates about faith and reason shows is that theological claims of the relationship between nature and supernature precedes the choice of method in Religious Studies and confessionally informed theology of ministry is used to defend a \"two-room\" solution between confessional and university theology.","PeriodicalId":38534,"journal":{"name":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51619/stk.v100i1.26099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religious Studies has a history of distancing itself from theology with the claim of being descriptive and theologically neutral. University theology, with reference here to Mårten Björk's recent article, on its part dis­tances itself against confessional theology. A norm-critical reading of these two claims makes clear that they are not substantiated. With Ingemar Hedenius as a starting point, it becomes clear that he assumes a particular view of "faith" as not entailing any extra type of knowledge, while this would be contested by theologians such as Augustine and Duns Scotus. What an awareness of the theological debates about faith and reason shows is that theological claims of the relationship between nature and supernature precedes the choice of method in Religious Studies and confessionally informed theology of ministry is used to defend a "two-room" solution between confessional and university theology.
神学的他者
宗教研究历来以描述性和神学中立自居,与神学保持距离。大学神学(这里指莫滕-比约克(Mårten Björk)最近的文章)则与忏悔神学保持距离。对这两种说法的规范批判性解读清楚地表明,这两种说法是不成立的。以英格玛-海德纽斯为起点,我们可以清楚地看到,他对 "信仰 "的特定看法是不包含任何额外的知识,而奥古斯丁和邓斯-司各脱(Duns Scotus)等神学家却对此提出了质疑。对信仰与理性的神学争论的认识表明,关于自然与超自然之间关系的神学主张先于宗教研究方法的选择,以忏悔为基础的事工神学被用来捍卫忏悔神学与大学神学之间的 "两室 "解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift
Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信