EFFECT OF GRAMMAR LEARNING STRATEGIES (GLS) IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: CASE STUDY ON VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN DETERMINING PROFICIENCY LEVELS

A. Aisyah, Ferri Hidayad, Muhammad Bambang Purwanto
{"title":"EFFECT OF GRAMMAR LEARNING STRATEGIES (GLS) IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: CASE STUDY ON VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN DETERMINING PROFICIENCY LEVELS","authors":"A. Aisyah, Ferri Hidayad, Muhammad Bambang Purwanto","doi":"10.31943/wej.v8i1.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study looked into the grammar learning techniques (GLS) employed by SMK Negeri 6 Palembang students. In particular, it looked at the mean variations in the GLS dependent on the students' competence levels. The data was gathered through a survey-based quantitative research design. Undergraduate grammar course students at SMK Negeri 6 Palembang were randomly given a set of surveys via Google Forms. Forty students answered the questionnaire, making them research participants. To evaluate the data, both descriptive and inferential analysis were performed. The results showed that the most frequently employed cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social strategies were, in that order, taking notes while listening to their teacher's explanations, figuring out why they made mistakes, pushing themselves to practice grammar, and asking friends for assistance. It was discovered that students most frequently employed social strategy. The study also showed that more high proficient students than low proficient students employed all strategies. For future research, teachers might adapt their teaching strategy to align with students' grammar learning strategies by using the research findings. Less skilled students can also pick up the strategy employed by the more skilled students, allowing them to gain from using the strategies in their own learning grammar.","PeriodicalId":248828,"journal":{"name":"Wiralodra English Journal","volume":"49 213","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiralodra English Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v8i1.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study looked into the grammar learning techniques (GLS) employed by SMK Negeri 6 Palembang students. In particular, it looked at the mean variations in the GLS dependent on the students' competence levels. The data was gathered through a survey-based quantitative research design. Undergraduate grammar course students at SMK Negeri 6 Palembang were randomly given a set of surveys via Google Forms. Forty students answered the questionnaire, making them research participants. To evaluate the data, both descriptive and inferential analysis were performed. The results showed that the most frequently employed cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social strategies were, in that order, taking notes while listening to their teacher's explanations, figuring out why they made mistakes, pushing themselves to practice grammar, and asking friends for assistance. It was discovered that students most frequently employed social strategy. The study also showed that more high proficient students than low proficient students employed all strategies. For future research, teachers might adapt their teaching strategy to align with students' grammar learning strategies by using the research findings. Less skilled students can also pick up the strategy employed by the more skilled students, allowing them to gain from using the strategies in their own learning grammar.
语法学习策略(GLS)在语言学习中的影响:职业高中学生确定能力水平的案例研究
本研究调查了巴伦邦第六中学(SMK Negeri 6 Palembang)学生使用的语法学习技巧(GLS)。特别是,它考察了语法学习技巧的平均差异与学生的能力水平之间的关系。数据是通过基于调查的定量研究设计收集的。通过谷歌表格随机向巴伦邦第六中学语法课程的本科生发放了一组调查问卷。40 名学生回答了问卷,成为研究参与者。为了评估数据,研究人员进行了描述性和推论性分析。结果显示,最常使用的认知策略、元认知策略、情感策略和社交策略依次为:听老师讲解时做笔记、找出自己犯错的原因、督促自己练习语法、向朋友寻求帮助。研究发现,学生最常使用的是社交策略。研究还显示,采用所有策略的高水平学生多于低水平学生。在今后的研究中,教师可根据研究结果调整教学策略,以配合学生的语法学习策略。语法水平较低的学生也可以学习语法水平较高的学生所使用的策略,让他们在自己的语法学习中也能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信