EFFECTIVENESS OF MULLIGAN TAPING VERSUS KINESIO TAPING WITH COMMON USE OF ULTRASOUND THERAPY IN TENNIS ELBOW OF CRICKET PLAYERS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY

Journal of Advanced Zoology Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.53555/jaz.v45i3.4438

Dr. Satyendra Nath Bhattacharyya, Dr. Amartya Mallick, Dr. Subhajit Mandal, Dr.Soumyajit Mandal

{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF MULLIGAN TAPING VERSUS KINESIO TAPING WITH COMMON USE OF ULTRASOUND THERAPY IN TENNIS ELBOW OF CRICKET PLAYERS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY","authors":"Dr. Satyendra Nath Bhattacharyya, Dr. Amartya Mallick, Dr. Subhajit Mandal, Dr.Soumyajit Mandal","doi":"10.53555/jaz.v45i3.4438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Mulligan taping versus kinesio taping with common use of ultrasound therapy in managing tennis elbow. METHODS: Thirty cricketers aged between 25 to 35 years, presenting with tennis elbow with symptom duration within one month, were randomized into two groups. The Group-A received Mulligan taping with ultrasound therapy and Group-B received kinesio taping with ultrasound therapy. Treatment duration was 3 times a weekly four weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data was obtained on pain intensity levels via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) grip strength via measuring Pain Free Grip Strength (PFGS) and functional status measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). RESULTS: Result shows that significant improvement in VAS (p=.04), PFGS (p=.02) and PRTEE (p=.01). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that kinesio taping with ultrasound therapy is a superior treatment approach compared to Mulligan taping with ultrasound therapy in managing tennis elbow.","PeriodicalId":509303,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Zoology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i3.4438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Mulligan taping versus kinesio taping with common use of ultrasound therapy in managing tennis elbow. METHODS: Thirty cricketers aged between 25 to 35 years, presenting with tennis elbow with symptom duration within one month, were randomized into two groups. The Group-A received Mulligan taping with ultrasound therapy and Group-B received kinesio taping with ultrasound therapy. Treatment duration was 3 times a weekly four weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data was obtained on pain intensity levels via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) grip strength via measuring Pain Free Grip Strength (PFGS) and functional status measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). RESULTS: Result shows that significant improvement in VAS (p=.04), PFGS (p=.02) and PRTEE (p=.01). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that kinesio taping with ultrasound therapy is a superior treatment approach compared to Mulligan taping with ultrasound therapy in managing tennis elbow.

查看原文本刊更多论文

板球运动员网球肘的穆里根绑带疗法与共同使用超声波疗法的肌动绑带疗法的有效性：随机临床研究

背景：本研究旨在比较穆里根绑带与肌动蛋白绑带以及常用超声波疗法在治疗网球肘方面的效果。方法：30 名年龄在 25 至 35 岁之间、患有网球肘且症状持续时间在一个月以内的板球运动员被随机分为两组。A 组接受穆里根绑带和超声波疗法，B 组接受肌腱绑带和超声波疗法。治疗时间为每周 3 次，每次四周。结果测量：通过视觉模拟量表（VAS）测量疼痛强度，通过无痛握力（PFGS）测量握力，通过患者评定的网球肘评估（PRTEE）测量功能状态。结果：结果显示，VAS（p=.04）、PFGS（p=.02）和PRTEE（p=.01）均有明显改善。结论：本研究结果表明，在治疗网球肘方面，与穆里根绑带加超声波疗法相比，运动绑带加超声波疗法是一种更优越的治疗方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Advanced Zoology

自引率

0.00%

发文量