Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

Reesha Joshi, Ram Jeevan, Selvaraju V. Amutha, Lakshmi Ramakrishnan, Naveen Ramji Natarajan
{"title":"Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial","authors":"Reesha Joshi, Ram Jeevan, Selvaraju V. Amutha, Lakshmi Ramakrishnan, Naveen Ramji Natarajan","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_71_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Regional techniques are a part of multimodal analgesia following cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery warrants a regional technique, which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia-like quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). In this study, we investigated the non-inferiority of ESPB at T12 and transmuscular-QLB (TQLB) at L2-L3 for postoperative analgesia in cesarean delivery.\n \n \n \n In this prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 124 patients undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled to receive bilateral TQLB or ESPB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side. All patients received prophylactic acetaminophen and ketorolac for 2 days. Our primary objective was to compare the total tramadol consumption in the first 48 h between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare cumulative tramadol consumption, postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at rest, and with movement at various time points, the time for first rescue analgesic requirement, development of complications related to the block, and patient satisfaction with analgesia between the two groups.\n \n \n \n The total tramadol consumption in 48 h (47.3 ± 34.9 mg in ESPB and 50.9 ± 38.7 mg in TQLB), duration of first rescue analgesic (22.8 ± 15.8 h in ESPB and 22.7 ± 15.6 h in TQLB), and patient satisfaction were similar between the two groups. Both groups had similar pain scores except at rest at 6 h and on movement at 4 h, 6 h, and 36 h, whereas the ESPB group had lower NRS scores (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB post-caesarean delivery.\n \n \n \n \n What is already known about the topic: Cesarean delivery warrants a regional analgesia technique which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia postoperatively. While quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a well-established technique for cesarean delivery there are very few comparative studies on erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in cesarean delivery. In the studies comparing ESPB for other lower abdominal procedures, it has been given at T9 only.\n \n What new information this study adds: The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB performed at L2-L3 with the same volume post-cesarean delivery and can be an important addition to multimodal analgesia protocols after cesarean delivery.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"39 153","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_71_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional techniques are a part of multimodal analgesia following cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery warrants a regional technique, which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia-like quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). In this study, we investigated the non-inferiority of ESPB at T12 and transmuscular-QLB (TQLB) at L2-L3 for postoperative analgesia in cesarean delivery. In this prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 124 patients undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled to receive bilateral TQLB or ESPB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side. All patients received prophylactic acetaminophen and ketorolac for 2 days. Our primary objective was to compare the total tramadol consumption in the first 48 h between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare cumulative tramadol consumption, postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at rest, and with movement at various time points, the time for first rescue analgesic requirement, development of complications related to the block, and patient satisfaction with analgesia between the two groups. The total tramadol consumption in 48 h (47.3 ± 34.9 mg in ESPB and 50.9 ± 38.7 mg in TQLB), duration of first rescue analgesic (22.8 ± 15.8 h in ESPB and 22.7 ± 15.6 h in TQLB), and patient satisfaction were similar between the two groups. Both groups had similar pain scores except at rest at 6 h and on movement at 4 h, 6 h, and 36 h, whereas the ESPB group had lower NRS scores (P < 0.05). The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB post-caesarean delivery. What is already known about the topic: Cesarean delivery warrants a regional analgesia technique which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia postoperatively. While quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a well-established technique for cesarean delivery there are very few comparative studies on erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in cesarean delivery. In the studies comparing ESPB for other lower abdominal procedures, it has been given at T9 only. What new information this study adds: The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB performed at L2-L3 with the same volume post-cesarean delivery and can be an important addition to multimodal analgesia protocols after cesarean delivery.
超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与经肌腰四肌阻滞在剖腹产术后镇痛中的比较:一项前瞻性随机非劣效性临床试验
区域技术是剖腹产后多模式镇痛的一部分。剖宫产需要一种区域性技术,它可以提供躯体和内脏镇痛,如腰四肌阻滞(QLB)和竖脊平面阻滞(ESPB)。在这项研究中,我们调查了 T12 位置的 ESPB 和 L2-L3 位置的跨肌-QLB(TQLB)在剖宫产术后镇痛中的非劣势。 在这项前瞻性、随机、非劣效试验中,124 名接受剖宫产手术的患者分别接受了双侧 TQLB 或 ESPB,每侧注射 20 mL 0.25% 罗哌卡因。所有患者都接受了为期两天的对乙酰氨基酚和酮咯酸预防性治疗。我们的首要目标是比较两组患者在最初 48 小时内的曲马多总消耗量。次要目标是比较两组患者在不同时间点的曲马多累积用量、术后静息和运动时的数字评定量表(NRS)评分、首次需要抢救性镇痛药的时间、阻滞相关并发症的发生情况以及患者对镇痛的满意度。 两组患者在 48 小时内的曲马多总用量(ESPB 为 47.3 ± 34.9 毫克,TQLB 为 50.9 ± 38.7 毫克)、首次抢救性镇痛持续时间(ESPB 为 22.8 ± 15.8 小时,TQLB 为 22.7 ± 15.6 小时)和患者满意度相似。两组的疼痛评分相似,但静息时(6 h)和运动时(4 h、6 h 和 36 h)除外,而 ESPB 组的 NRS 评分较低(P < 0.05)。 T12双侧ESPB的镇痛效果不劣于剖腹产后双侧TQLB。 关于该主题的已知信息:剖宫产术后需要一种能提供躯体和内脏镇痛的区域镇痛技术。腰椎四头肌阻滞(QLB)是一种行之有效的剖宫产技术,但关于竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在剖宫产中的应用的对比研究却很少。在比较用于其他下腹部手术的 ESPB 的研究中,仅在 T9 进行了 ESPB。 本研究增加了哪些新信息?在剖宫产术后,在T12处进行双侧ESPB的镇痛效果不劣于在L2-L3处进行双侧TQLB的镇痛效果,可作为剖宫产术后多模式镇痛方案的重要补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信