Bibliometric analysis of neurofeedback research from 2000 to 2022

Q4 Neuroscience
Siti Atiyah Ali, Mazira Mohamad Ghazali, Nurfaizatul Aisyah Ab Aziz, Humaira Nisar
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of neurofeedback research from 2000 to 2022","authors":"Siti Atiyah Ali, Mazira Mohamad Ghazali, Nurfaizatul Aisyah Ab Aziz, Humaira Nisar","doi":"10.31117/neuroscirn.v7i1.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of neurofeedback is gaining increasing interest among neuroscientists as a potential neurorehabilitation approach in cases of various neuro-related functional abnormalities. Discovering the current state of research and identifying gaps in the field of neurofeedback is an essential step in planning and mapping out future research efforts. This bibliometric analysis paper aims to identify the publications and research in neurofeedback from 2000 to 2022. A comprehensive Scopus database search was conducted using the keyword \"neurofeedback\" and relevant publications from 2000 to 2022 were retrieved. Bibliometric analyses were performed using the Harzing's Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software programmes. The number of retrieved documents was 1835. The number of publications has shown a steadily increasing trend since 2000, with a prominent spike in publications in 2014–2015, indicating a sudden interest in neurofeedback. Among the retrieved documents, 50.3% were related to neuroscience, 23.7% related to medicine, and 13.1% related to psychology. The main contributors to this research come from the United States (24.7%), Germany (13.7%), the United Kingdom (9.4%), and Switzerland (4.9%). Based on the network visualisation of author keywords, the most frequently occurring keywords were neurofeedback, real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), brain-computer interface (BCI), neuromodulation, and neurofeedback training. This bibliometric analysis presents the current status, knowledge base, and future neurofeedback study directions. These findings will benefit future researchers interested in applying neurofeedback as a potential neurorehabilitation approach for a wider population.","PeriodicalId":36108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v7i1.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of neurofeedback is gaining increasing interest among neuroscientists as a potential neurorehabilitation approach in cases of various neuro-related functional abnormalities. Discovering the current state of research and identifying gaps in the field of neurofeedback is an essential step in planning and mapping out future research efforts. This bibliometric analysis paper aims to identify the publications and research in neurofeedback from 2000 to 2022. A comprehensive Scopus database search was conducted using the keyword "neurofeedback" and relevant publications from 2000 to 2022 were retrieved. Bibliometric analyses were performed using the Harzing's Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software programmes. The number of retrieved documents was 1835. The number of publications has shown a steadily increasing trend since 2000, with a prominent spike in publications in 2014–2015, indicating a sudden interest in neurofeedback. Among the retrieved documents, 50.3% were related to neuroscience, 23.7% related to medicine, and 13.1% related to psychology. The main contributors to this research come from the United States (24.7%), Germany (13.7%), the United Kingdom (9.4%), and Switzerland (4.9%). Based on the network visualisation of author keywords, the most frequently occurring keywords were neurofeedback, real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), brain-computer interface (BCI), neuromodulation, and neurofeedback training. This bibliometric analysis presents the current status, knowledge base, and future neurofeedback study directions. These findings will benefit future researchers interested in applying neurofeedback as a potential neurorehabilitation approach for a wider population.
2000 年至 2022 年神经反馈研究的文献计量分析
神经反馈作为一种潜在的神经康复方法,在各种神经相关功能异常病例中的应用正日益受到神经科学家的关注。了解神经反馈领域的研究现状并找出差距,是规划和绘制未来研究工作的重要一步。本文献计量分析报告旨在确定 2000 年至 2022 年期间神经反馈领域的出版物和研究。我们使用关键词 "神经反馈 "对 Scopus 数据库进行了全面搜索,并检索了 2000 年至 2022 年的相关出版物。使用 Harzing's Publish or Perish 和 VOSviewer 软件程序进行了文献计量分析。检索到的文献数量为 1835 篇。自2000年以来,论文数量呈稳步增长趋势,2014-2015年论文数量激增,表明人们对神经反馈的兴趣骤然升温。在检索到的文献中,50.3%与神经科学有关,23.7%与医学有关,13.1%与心理学有关。这项研究的主要贡献者来自美国(24.7%)、德国(13.7%)、英国(9.4%)和瑞士(4.9%)。根据作者关键词的网络可视化,最常出现的关键词是神经反馈、实时功能磁共振成像(fMRI)、脑机接口(BCI)、神经调节和神经反馈训练。这项文献计量分析介绍了神经反馈研究的现状、知识基础和未来研究方向。这些发现将使未来有兴趣将神经反馈作为一种潜在的神经康复方法应用于更广泛人群的研究人员受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research Notes
Neuroscience Research Notes Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信