Changes of Interprofessional Education in Athletic Training: A 5-Year Follow-up Study

Jeane Silva, J. D. Tracy, Tim McLane, Jessica Lynn Stewart, Jason Hughes, Angela Allen, Gianluca De Leo
{"title":"Changes of Interprofessional Education in Athletic Training: A 5-Year Follow-up Study","authors":"Jeane Silva, J. D. Tracy, Tim McLane, Jessica Lynn Stewart, Jason Hughes, Angela Allen, Gianluca De Leo","doi":"10.5539/jel.v13n4p31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interprofessional Education (IPE) prepares students in the healthcare field for collaborative practices. Faculty perceptions of IPE have been investigated among several health professions. We assess athletic training (AT) faculty perceptions of the importance of the four IPE competencies, their attitudes towards IPE, their attitudes and beliefs about IPE in the academic settings, their perceived barriers, and opportunities towards implementing IPE in AT curricula; and how these have changed. This study utilized a cross-sectional online survey administered anonymously in 2017 and 2022. The study population was faculty from accredited AT education programs in the USA identified through the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA). We find that in the last five years, faculty perception of IPE has shifted to a more positive attitude toward understanding and implementing IPE in AT programs. However, data showed no significant differences between the initial and follow-up studies. Values and ethics and teams and teamwork were the two competencies ranked the highest in both studies. Younger respondents ranked communication higher than older respondents. Barriers to IPE implementation included lack of resources, allocated funding, and institutional support. The creation of an IPE program coordinator was one of the opportunities highlighted. Faculty of AT programs are aware of the importance of IPE and demonstrated a general positive attitude toward implementing IPE in their AT curricula. However, several barriers have been identified, including a perceived negative attitudes toward AT from other health professions.","PeriodicalId":502937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Learning","volume":"90 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n4p31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional Education (IPE) prepares students in the healthcare field for collaborative practices. Faculty perceptions of IPE have been investigated among several health professions. We assess athletic training (AT) faculty perceptions of the importance of the four IPE competencies, their attitudes towards IPE, their attitudes and beliefs about IPE in the academic settings, their perceived barriers, and opportunities towards implementing IPE in AT curricula; and how these have changed. This study utilized a cross-sectional online survey administered anonymously in 2017 and 2022. The study population was faculty from accredited AT education programs in the USA identified through the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA). We find that in the last five years, faculty perception of IPE has shifted to a more positive attitude toward understanding and implementing IPE in AT programs. However, data showed no significant differences between the initial and follow-up studies. Values and ethics and teams and teamwork were the two competencies ranked the highest in both studies. Younger respondents ranked communication higher than older respondents. Barriers to IPE implementation included lack of resources, allocated funding, and institutional support. The creation of an IPE program coordinator was one of the opportunities highlighted. Faculty of AT programs are aware of the importance of IPE and demonstrated a general positive attitude toward implementing IPE in their AT curricula. However, several barriers have been identified, including a perceived negative attitudes toward AT from other health professions.
运动训练专业间教育的变化:五年跟踪研究
跨专业教育(IPE)培养学生在医疗保健领域的合作实践能力。已经对多个健康专业的教师对 IPE 的看法进行了调查。我们评估了运动训练(AT)教师对四种 IPE 能力重要性的看法、他们对 IPE 的态度、他们对学术环境中 IPE 的态度和信念、他们感知到的障碍、在 AT 课程中实施 IPE 的机会,以及这些因素发生了哪些变化。本研究采用了一项横断面在线调查,于 2017 年和 2022 年匿名进行。研究对象是美国国家运动训练员协会(NATA)认可的运动训练员教育项目的教师。我们发现,在过去的五年中,教师对IPE的看法已经转变为对理解和在AT项目中实施IPE持更加积极的态度。然而,数据显示初始研究和后续研究之间没有明显差异。在两项研究中,价值观和道德以及团队和团队合作是排名最高的两项能力。年轻受访者对沟通能力的评价高于年长受访者。实施 IPE 的障碍包括缺乏资源、分配资金和机构支持。设立 IPE 项目协调员是其中一个值得强调的机会。辅助医疗课程的教师意识到 IPE 的重要性,并对在其辅助医疗课程中实施 IPE 普遍持积极态度。然而,也发现了一些障碍,包括其他卫生专业对辅助医疗的消极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信