Decolonising Fire Science by Reexamining Fire Management across Contested Landscapes: A Workshop Approach

Fire Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.3390/fire7030094
Abigail R. Croker, Adriana E. S. Ford, Y. Kountouris, Jay Mistry, Amos Chege Muthiuru, Cathy Smith, Elijah Praise, David O. Chiawo, Veronica Muniu
{"title":"Decolonising Fire Science by Reexamining Fire Management across Contested Landscapes: A Workshop Approach","authors":"Abigail R. Croker, Adriana E. S. Ford, Y. Kountouris, Jay Mistry, Amos Chege Muthiuru, Cathy Smith, Elijah Praise, David O. Chiawo, Veronica Muniu","doi":"10.3390/fire7030094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many landscapes worldwide, fire regimes and human–fire interactions were reorganised by colonialism and continue to be shaped by neo-colonial processes. The introduction of fire suppression policies and state-centric property-rights systems across conservation areas and the intentional erasure of Indigenous governance systems and knowledge have served to decouple Indigenous fire-dependent communities from culturally mediated fire regimes and fire-adapted landscapes. This has driven a decline in anthropogenic fires while simultaneously increasing wildfire risk where Indigenous people have been excluded, resulting in widespread social–ecological vulnerabilities. Much contemporary fire research also bears colonial legacies in its epistemological traditions, in the global geographical distribution of research institutions, and the accessibility of research outputs. We report on a two-day workshop titled ‘Fire Management Across Contested Landscapes’ convened concurrently in Nairobi, Kenya, and London, UK. The workshop formed part of a series of workshops on ‘Decolonising Fire Science’ held by the Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, UK. The workshop in Nairobi invited diverse Kenyan stakeholders to engage in participatory activities that facilitate knowledge sharing, aiming to establish an inclusive working fire network. Activities included rich pictures, world café discussions, participatory art, and the co-development of a declaration to guide fire management in Kenya. Meanwhile, in London, Leverhulme Wildfires researchers explored participatory research methodologies including rich pictures and participatory video, and developed a declaration to guide more equitable research. There were opportunities throughout the workshop for participants in Nairobi and London to engage in dialogue with one another, sharing their experiences and understandings of complex fire challenges in Kenya and globally.","PeriodicalId":12279,"journal":{"name":"Fire","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7030094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many landscapes worldwide, fire regimes and human–fire interactions were reorganised by colonialism and continue to be shaped by neo-colonial processes. The introduction of fire suppression policies and state-centric property-rights systems across conservation areas and the intentional erasure of Indigenous governance systems and knowledge have served to decouple Indigenous fire-dependent communities from culturally mediated fire regimes and fire-adapted landscapes. This has driven a decline in anthropogenic fires while simultaneously increasing wildfire risk where Indigenous people have been excluded, resulting in widespread social–ecological vulnerabilities. Much contemporary fire research also bears colonial legacies in its epistemological traditions, in the global geographical distribution of research institutions, and the accessibility of research outputs. We report on a two-day workshop titled ‘Fire Management Across Contested Landscapes’ convened concurrently in Nairobi, Kenya, and London, UK. The workshop formed part of a series of workshops on ‘Decolonising Fire Science’ held by the Leverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, UK. The workshop in Nairobi invited diverse Kenyan stakeholders to engage in participatory activities that facilitate knowledge sharing, aiming to establish an inclusive working fire network. Activities included rich pictures, world café discussions, participatory art, and the co-development of a declaration to guide fire management in Kenya. Meanwhile, in London, Leverhulme Wildfires researchers explored participatory research methodologies including rich pictures and participatory video, and developed a declaration to guide more equitable research. There were opportunities throughout the workshop for participants in Nairobi and London to engage in dialogue with one another, sharing their experiences and understandings of complex fire challenges in Kenya and globally.
通过重新审视有争议地貌的火灾管理,实现火灾科学的非殖民化:研讨会方法
在世界各地的许多地貌中,火灾制度和人类与火灾的互动是由殖民主义重组的,并继续由新殖民主义进程塑造。在整个保护区推行的灭火政策和以国家为中心的产权制度,以及对土著治理体系和知识的有意抹杀,使得依赖火灾的土著社区与以文化为媒介的火灾机制和适应火灾的景观脱钩。这导致了人为火灾的减少,同时也增加了土著居民被排斥在外的野火风险,造成了广泛的社会生态脆弱性。许多当代火灾研究在认识论传统、研究机构的全球地理分布以及研究成果的可获取性方面也带有殖民主义色彩。我们报告了在肯尼亚内罗毕和英国伦敦同时召开的为期两天的题为 "跨越有争议地貌的火灾管理 "研讨会的情况。该研讨会是英国勒弗胡尔姆野火、环境与社会研究中心举办的 "火灾科学非殖民化 "系列研讨会的一部分。在内罗毕举办的研讨会邀请肯尼亚各利益相关方参与促进知识共享的活动,旨在建立一个包容性的消防工作网络。活动包括丰富的图片、世界咖啡馆讨论、参与式艺术,以及共同制定指导肯尼亚火灾管理的宣言。同时,在伦敦,Leverhulme 野火研究人员探索了参与式研究方法,包括丰富图片和参与式视频,并制定了一份宣言,以指导更公平的研究。在整个研讨会期间,内罗毕和伦敦的与会者都有机会相互对话,分享他们的经验以及对肯尼亚和全球复杂火灾挑战的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信