Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma vs. radiofrequency nerve ablation for refractory plantar fasciitis

Furkan Erdoğan, Tolgahan Cengiz, Alparslan Yurtbay, İ. Büyükceran
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma vs. radiofrequency nerve ablation for refractory plantar fasciitis","authors":"Furkan Erdoğan, Tolgahan Cengiz, Alparslan Yurtbay, İ. Büyükceran","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1388703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Plantar fasciitis (PF), which accounts for approximately 80% of heel pain, is a common condition affecting adults' quality of life. There are many different treatment modalities used in the treatment of PF. In this study, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with chronic PF in our clinic who underwent USG-guided PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injection and patients who underwent RFNA (radiofrequency nerve ablation) treatment. \nMethods: Ultrasound-guided PRP injection or RFNA was performed on 95 patients who were diagnosed with chronic PF and met the inclusion criteria. This group of patients was followed for at least one year (October 2021-October 2023), and the clinical and functional results of the patients were compared.\nResults: The mean pre-treatment Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) posterior-ankle scores were similar, and no significant difference was found (P>0.05). A significant improvement was observed in the groups' FFI, VAS, and AFOAS scores after treatment (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in treatment modalities (P>0.05). \nConclusions: As a result of the study, it was concluded that PRP injection and RFNA are effective treatment methods in patients diagnosed with chronic plantar fasciitis without response to other conservative treatment methods, but these two methods are not superior to each other.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1388703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Plantar fasciitis (PF), which accounts for approximately 80% of heel pain, is a common condition affecting adults' quality of life. There are many different treatment modalities used in the treatment of PF. In this study, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with chronic PF in our clinic who underwent USG-guided PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injection and patients who underwent RFNA (radiofrequency nerve ablation) treatment. Methods: Ultrasound-guided PRP injection or RFNA was performed on 95 patients who were diagnosed with chronic PF and met the inclusion criteria. This group of patients was followed for at least one year (October 2021-October 2023), and the clinical and functional results of the patients were compared. Results: The mean pre-treatment Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) posterior-ankle scores were similar, and no significant difference was found (P>0.05). A significant improvement was observed in the groups' FFI, VAS, and AFOAS scores after treatment (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in treatment modalities (P>0.05). Conclusions: As a result of the study, it was concluded that PRP injection and RFNA are effective treatment methods in patients diagnosed with chronic plantar fasciitis without response to other conservative treatment methods, but these two methods are not superior to each other.
超声引导下富血小板血浆与射频神经消融术治疗难治性足底筋膜炎的比较
目的:足底筋膜炎(PF)约占足跟疼痛的 80%,是影响成年人生活质量的常见疾病。治疗足底筋膜炎的方法有很多种。在本研究中,我们比较了在本诊所接受 USG 引导的 PRP(富血小板血浆)注射和 RFNA(射频神经消融)治疗的慢性足底筋膜炎患者的临床和功能疗效。方法对 95 名符合纳入标准的慢性前房脓肿患者进行超声引导下 PRP 注射或 RFNA 治疗。对这组患者进行至少一年(2021 年 10 月至 2023 年 10 月)的随访,并比较患者的临床和功能结果:治疗前的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)、足部功能指数(FFI)和美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)后踝评分相似,无明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组的 FFI、VAS 和 AFOAS 评分均有明显改善(P0.05)。结论:研究结果表明,对于其他保守治疗方法无效的慢性足底筋膜炎患者,PRP 注射和 RFNA 是有效的治疗方法,但这两种方法并无优劣之分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信