Results of bisphosphonate withdrawal: duration of antiresorptive activity, fractures, changes in BMD and bone turnover markers

K. Belova, O. Ershova, I. Skripnikova
{"title":"Results of bisphosphonate withdrawal: duration of antiresorptive activity, fractures, changes in BMD and bone turnover markers","authors":"K. Belova, O. Ershova, I. Skripnikova","doi":"10.14341/osteo13145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review discusses the possibility of discontinuation of bisphosphonates (BPs), based on the mechanism of action of the drugs, the duration of their antiresorptive activity, criteria for discontinuation and return to therapy. BPs have a unique feature – maintaining the clinical effect for a long time after their withdrawal. Since BPs therapy is carried out for a long time, their accumulation in bone tissue, on the one hand, and the risk of developing severe adverse events, on the other hand, gave rise to discussion on the concept of temporary withdrawal of drugs and the organization of «drug holidays». The main criteria that are relied upon in the question of discontinuation of BPs and re-prescription at present are: 1) the risk of developing new fractures, 2) changes in bone mineral density (BMD), 3) dynamics of markers of bone metabolism. The conducted studies suggest that the suspension of treatment after 3-5 years of continuous therapy with BPs is possible in women who do not have low BMD indicators at the end of the course of therapy, while with continuing low levels of BMD, additional benefits from continuing therapy are likely. The loss of bone mass in the proximal femur and its preservation in the spine 2 years after discontinuation of BPs treatment is explained by their different localization and longer-term effect on bone metabolism in the spongy bone, i.e. in the spine. Delivery and absorption of BPs in the spine may be more intense than in other parts of the skeleton. Tracking the level of markers during a break in the treatment of BPs can be useful to determine the time of resumption of therapy: if their concentration approaches the baseline (before treatment), the patient’s condition should be reassessed and the issue of resuming therapy should be discussed. It should be noted that the optimal duration of «drug holidays» has not been established and should be selected individually depending on clinical circumstances, taking into account the presence of fractures, a significant decrease in BMD or an increase in markers of bone metabolism, as well as the presence and/or appearance of new clinically significant risk factors.","PeriodicalId":19700,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo13145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The review discusses the possibility of discontinuation of bisphosphonates (BPs), based on the mechanism of action of the drugs, the duration of their antiresorptive activity, criteria for discontinuation and return to therapy. BPs have a unique feature – maintaining the clinical effect for a long time after their withdrawal. Since BPs therapy is carried out for a long time, their accumulation in bone tissue, on the one hand, and the risk of developing severe adverse events, on the other hand, gave rise to discussion on the concept of temporary withdrawal of drugs and the organization of «drug holidays». The main criteria that are relied upon in the question of discontinuation of BPs and re-prescription at present are: 1) the risk of developing new fractures, 2) changes in bone mineral density (BMD), 3) dynamics of markers of bone metabolism. The conducted studies suggest that the suspension of treatment after 3-5 years of continuous therapy with BPs is possible in women who do not have low BMD indicators at the end of the course of therapy, while with continuing low levels of BMD, additional benefits from continuing therapy are likely. The loss of bone mass in the proximal femur and its preservation in the spine 2 years after discontinuation of BPs treatment is explained by their different localization and longer-term effect on bone metabolism in the spongy bone, i.e. in the spine. Delivery and absorption of BPs in the spine may be more intense than in other parts of the skeleton. Tracking the level of markers during a break in the treatment of BPs can be useful to determine the time of resumption of therapy: if their concentration approaches the baseline (before treatment), the patient’s condition should be reassessed and the issue of resuming therapy should be discussed. It should be noted that the optimal duration of «drug holidays» has not been established and should be selected individually depending on clinical circumstances, taking into account the presence of fractures, a significant decrease in BMD or an increase in markers of bone metabolism, as well as the presence and/or appearance of new clinically significant risk factors.
停用双膦酸盐的结果:抗骨吸收活性持续时间、骨折、骨密度和骨转换标志物的变化
本综述根据双膦酸盐(BPs)的作用机制、其抗骨吸收活性的持续时间、停药和恢复治疗的标准,讨论了停药的可能性。双膦酸盐有一个独特的特点--停药后仍能长期保持临床疗效。由于 BPs 治疗需要长期进行,一方面它们会在骨组织中蓄积,另一方面也存在发生严重不良反应的风险,因此人们开始讨论暂时停药和组织 "药物假期 "的概念。目前,停用 BPs 和重新开处方所依据的主要标准是1) 发生新骨折的风险;2) 骨矿物质密度(BMD)的变化;3) 骨代谢指标的动态变化。已开展的研究表明,对于在疗程结束时骨矿物质密度指标不低的妇女,可以在连续使用 BPs 治疗 3-5 年后暂停治疗,而对于骨矿物质密度水平持续较低的妇女,继续治疗可能会带来额外的益处。停止 BPs 治疗 2 年后,股骨近端骨量减少,而脊柱骨量保持不变,这是因为 BPs 在海绵骨(即脊柱)中的不同定位和对骨代谢的长期影响。骨保护剂在脊柱中的传递和吸收可能比骨骼的其他部位更为强烈。在 BPs 治疗中断期间跟踪标记物的水平有助于确定恢复治疗的时间:如果标记物的浓度接近基线(治疗前),则应重新评估患者的病情并讨论恢复治疗的问题。需要注意的是,"药物假期 "的最佳持续时间尚未确定,应根据临床情况单独选择,同时考虑是否存在骨折、骨密度显著降低或骨代谢指标升高,以及是否存在和/或出现新的临床重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信