Legal reality or legal mirage? Examining the relationship between police violence, legal consciousness, and the promise of civil legal justice

Theresa Rocha Beardall
{"title":"Legal reality or legal mirage? Examining the relationship between police violence, legal consciousness, and the promise of civil legal justice","authors":"Theresa Rocha Beardall","doi":"10.1177/14624745241237702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Race-and-class-subjugated communities continue to experience disproportionate police violence despite increased attention to this longstanding problem. This study examines how residents make sense of the legal issues that arise from these encounters and turn to civil law for assistance. I do so by unifying scholarship on police encounters, legal consciousness, and access to justice to consider the obstacles everyday people encounter when they consider filing a civil legal claim in the aftermath of police violence. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with 24 residents and two attorneys specializing in police brutality, I find that all residents, but especially those who sought civil legal justice, experienced what this study calls a legal mirage—which occurs when a knowable legal process exists to pursue one’s rights, but a variety of barriers (e.g., structural, human, financial) make that process unreachable. Three obstacles reinforced this mirage: difficulties obtaining competent representation, unresponsiveness when securing evidence, and frustration navigating municipal indemnification. I conclude by outlining the practical implications of this research for advocates looking to increase access to civil legal services and reduce police violence. Without these interventions, civil legal justice may remain elusive and beyond the reach of everyday people.","PeriodicalId":508618,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241237702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Race-and-class-subjugated communities continue to experience disproportionate police violence despite increased attention to this longstanding problem. This study examines how residents make sense of the legal issues that arise from these encounters and turn to civil law for assistance. I do so by unifying scholarship on police encounters, legal consciousness, and access to justice to consider the obstacles everyday people encounter when they consider filing a civil legal claim in the aftermath of police violence. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with 24 residents and two attorneys specializing in police brutality, I find that all residents, but especially those who sought civil legal justice, experienced what this study calls a legal mirage—which occurs when a knowable legal process exists to pursue one’s rights, but a variety of barriers (e.g., structural, human, financial) make that process unreachable. Three obstacles reinforced this mirage: difficulties obtaining competent representation, unresponsiveness when securing evidence, and frustration navigating municipal indemnification. I conclude by outlining the practical implications of this research for advocates looking to increase access to civil legal services and reduce police violence. Without these interventions, civil legal justice may remain elusive and beyond the reach of everyday people.
法律现实还是法律海市蜃楼?研究警察暴力、法律意识和民事法律正义承诺之间的关系
尽管人们越来越关注警察暴力这一长期存在的问题,但种族和阶级被征服的社区仍然遭受着不成比例的警察暴力。本研究探讨了居民如何理解这些遭遇中产生的法律问题,并向民法寻求帮助。为此,我将遭遇警察、法律意识和诉诸司法等方面的学术研究结合起来,以考虑普通人在遭遇警察暴力后考虑提出民事法律索赔时所遇到的障碍。通过对 24 名居民和两名专门研究警察暴力问题的律师进行人种学实地调查和访谈,我发现所有居民,尤其是那些寻求民事法律正义的居民,都经历了本研究中所说的法律海市蜃楼--当存在一个可知的法律程序来追求自己的权利,但各种障碍(如结构性障碍、人为障碍、经济障碍等)使该程序无法实现时,就会出现这种海市蜃楼。三个障碍强化了这一海市蜃楼:难以获得称职的代理律师、获取证据时反应迟钝,以及在市政赔偿方面遇到挫折。最后,我概述了本研究对希望增加获得民事法律服务机会和减少警察暴力的倡导者的实际影响。如果不采取这些干预措施,民事法律正义可能仍然难以实现,普通人也难以企及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信