Effect of High-Dose Subcutaneous Spesolimab on Skin Manifestations: Results from the Pivotal Effisayil 2 Trial of Flare Prevention in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Bruce Strober, Matthias Augustin, Yayoi Tada, Amit Garg, D. Jullien, Alice B. Gottlieb, Johann Gudjonsson, Na Hu, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Angelo Marzano
{"title":"Effect of High-Dose Subcutaneous Spesolimab on Skin Manifestations: Results from the Pivotal Effisayil 2 Trial of Flare Prevention in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis","authors":"Bruce Strober, Matthias Augustin, Yayoi Tada, Amit Garg, D. Jullien, Alice B. Gottlieb, Johann Gudjonsson, Na Hu, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Angelo Marzano","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is an effective and approved treatment for GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) was a pivotal, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on GPP lesions. \nMaterials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. High-dose spesolimab regimen was loading dose 600 mg, followed by maintenance dose 300 mg every 4 weeks. GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) subscores for erythema, pustules and scaling/crusting, and total score were compared between high-dose spesolimab and placebo groups at baseline and over the treatment period (scale: 0, clear to 4, severe). \nResults: Proportion of patients with baseline score of 0 for each GPPGA subscore and total score was generally similar between treatment groups, except erythema; (high-dose spesolimab [n=30] vs placebo [n=31]: erythema, 13.3% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 67.7%; scaling/crusting, 23.3% vs 22.6%; total score, 10.0% vs 12.9%). By Week 4, proportion of patients with scores of 0 increased with high-dose spesolimab versus placebo, (erythema, 33.3% vs 19.4%; pustules, 80.0% vs 41.9%; scaling/crusting, 30.0% vs 19.4%; total score, 26.7% vs 16.1%), and high-dose spesolimab group had fewer flares (10.0% vs 35.5%). This trend was maintained at Week 24 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 63.3% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 36.7% vs 19.4%; total score, 33.3% vs 19.4%) and Week 48 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 43.3% vs 25.8%; total score, 36.7% vs 22.6%). There were no new flares after Week 4 in high-dose spesolimab group; however, flares increased with placebo (45.2% at Week 24; 51.6% at Week 48). \nConclusion: Versus placebo, high-dose subcutaneous spesolimab resulted in a greater proportion of patients maintaining GPPGA scores of 0, a lower proportion having flares at Week 4, and no new flares after Week 4. This was sustained at Weeks 24 and 48. ","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is an effective and approved treatment for GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) was a pivotal, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on GPP lesions.
Materials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. High-dose spesolimab regimen was loading dose 600 mg, followed by maintenance dose 300 mg every 4 weeks. GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) subscores for erythema, pustules and scaling/crusting, and total score were compared between high-dose spesolimab and placebo groups at baseline and over the treatment period (scale: 0, clear to 4, severe).
Results: Proportion of patients with baseline score of 0 for each GPPGA subscore and total score was generally similar between treatment groups, except erythema; (high-dose spesolimab [n=30] vs placebo [n=31]: erythema, 13.3% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 67.7%; scaling/crusting, 23.3% vs 22.6%; total score, 10.0% vs 12.9%). By Week 4, proportion of patients with scores of 0 increased with high-dose spesolimab versus placebo, (erythema, 33.3% vs 19.4%; pustules, 80.0% vs 41.9%; scaling/crusting, 30.0% vs 19.4%; total score, 26.7% vs 16.1%), and high-dose spesolimab group had fewer flares (10.0% vs 35.5%). This trend was maintained at Week 24 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 63.3% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 36.7% vs 19.4%; total score, 33.3% vs 19.4%) and Week 48 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 43.3% vs 25.8%; total score, 36.7% vs 22.6%). There were no new flares after Week 4 in high-dose spesolimab group; however, flares increased with placebo (45.2% at Week 24; 51.6% at Week 48).
Conclusion: Versus placebo, high-dose subcutaneous spesolimab resulted in a greater proportion of patients maintaining GPPGA scores of 0, a lower proportion having flares at Week 4, and no new flares after Week 4. This was sustained at Weeks 24 and 48.
简介和目标:泛发性脓疱型银屑病(GPP)是一种慢性、罕见且可能危及生命的皮肤病,其特点是无菌性脓疱复发。斯派索利单抗是一种抗白细胞介素-36受体的单克隆抗体,是治疗成人脓疱型银屑病复发的有效药物,并已获得批准。Effisayil 2(NCT04399837)是一项关键性随机对照试验,评估了皮下注射斯派索利单抗预防GPP复发的有效性和安全性。在此,我们报告了大剂量斯派索利单抗与安慰剂相比对 GPP 病变的影响。材料与方法:有 GPP 病史的合格患者随机(1:1:1:1:1)接受三种皮下注射斯派索利单抗方案或安慰剂中的一种,为期 48 周。高剂量斯派索利单抗方案为负荷剂量 600 毫克,随后每 4 周维持剂量 300 毫克。比较了大剂量斯派索利单抗组和安慰剂组在基线和治疗期间的红斑、脓疱、脱屑/结痂的GPP医生总体评估(GPPGA)子评分和总评分(评分标准:0分,无明显症状至4分,严重)。结果除红斑外,各治疗组 GPPGA 子评分和总评分基线为 0 分的患者比例基本相似(大剂量斯派索利单抗[n=30] vs 安慰剂[n=31]:红斑,13.3% vs 22.6%;脓疱,66.7% vs 67.7%;脱屑/结痂,23.3% vs 22.6%;总分,10.0% vs 12.9%)。到第4周时,大剂量斯派索利单抗与安慰剂相比,得分为0的患者比例有所增加(红斑,33.3% vs 19.4%;脓疱,80.0% vs 41.9%;脱屑/结痂,30.0% vs 19.4%;总分,26.7% vs 16.1%),而且大剂量斯派索利单抗组的复发率较低(10.0% vs 35.5%)。这一趋势在第24周(红斑,36.7% vs 22.6%;脓疱,63.3% vs 45.2%;脱屑/结痂,36.7% vs 19.4%;总分,33.3% vs 19.4%)和第48周(红斑,36.7% vs 22.6%;脓疱,66.7% vs 45.2%;脱屑/结痂,43.3% vs 25.8%;总分,36.7% vs 22.6%)保持不变。大剂量斯派索利单抗组在第4周后没有出现新的复发;但安慰剂组的复发率有所增加(第24周为45.2%;第48周为51.6%)。结论与安慰剂相比,大剂量皮下注射斯派索利单抗可使更多患者的GPPGA评分维持在0分,降低第4周复发的比例,并且在第4周后不再出现新的复发。这种情况在第24周和第48周得以持续。