SEDATION DEPTH DURING CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT AND HOSPITALIZATION

M. Haroon, .. Sulaiman, MJ Khan, I. Haq, S. Ahmad, S. Malik
{"title":"SEDATION DEPTH DURING CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT AND HOSPITALIZATION","authors":"M. Haroon, .. Sulaiman, MJ Khan, I. Haq, S. Ahmad, S. Malik","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in attained levels of sedation both within intensive care units and collectively regarding overall outcomes when patients were transported outside a hospital either pre-hospital or while being inter-facility transfer by different critical care agencies, having been exposed to light versus deep quality of anaesthesia. After the ethical approval from the institutional review board, this cross-sectional study was conducted at Khyber Teaching Hospital from 01/06/22 to 31/12/22. The primary outcome measure was the relation of starting deep sedation during transport to deep sedation in the first 48 hours after admission (defined as RASS -3 and less). Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation duration, inpatient mortality, total hospital stay length of ICU, and delirium within 48 h; coma may also be observed. Final transport RASS in both the study groups was-4.43±0.49 and-1.5±0.5 (p <0.0001). Mean Hospital duration in both study groups was 13.01±4.8 and 35±5.9 days (p<0.0001). A high percentage of inpatient mortality, delirium, and coma cases was seen in the deep sedation group (p<0.0001). The transfer of patient care from the transport team to the hospital team presents a chance to potentially interrupt the progress of treatment and reassess decisions regarding sedation.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in attained levels of sedation both within intensive care units and collectively regarding overall outcomes when patients were transported outside a hospital either pre-hospital or while being inter-facility transfer by different critical care agencies, having been exposed to light versus deep quality of anaesthesia. After the ethical approval from the institutional review board, this cross-sectional study was conducted at Khyber Teaching Hospital from 01/06/22 to 31/12/22. The primary outcome measure was the relation of starting deep sedation during transport to deep sedation in the first 48 hours after admission (defined as RASS -3 and less). Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation duration, inpatient mortality, total hospital stay length of ICU, and delirium within 48 h; coma may also be observed. Final transport RASS in both the study groups was-4.43±0.49 and-1.5±0.5 (p <0.0001). Mean Hospital duration in both study groups was 13.01±4.8 and 35±5.9 days (p<0.0001). A high percentage of inpatient mortality, delirium, and coma cases was seen in the deep sedation group (p<0.0001). The transfer of patient care from the transport team to the hospital team presents a chance to potentially interrupt the progress of treatment and reassess decisions regarding sedation.
重症监护转运和住院期间的镇静深度
本研究的目的是确定重症监护病房内达到的镇静水平的差异,以及不同重症监护机构在院前或医院间转运病人时,病人在接受轻度和深度麻醉后,总体结果的差异。在获得机构审查委员会的伦理批准后,这项横断面研究于 2012 年 6 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日在开伯尔教学医院进行。主要结果指标是转运过程中开始深度镇静与入院后 48 小时内深度镇静(定义为 RASS -3 及以下)的关系。次要结果包括机械通气持续时间、住院患者死亡率、重症监护室总住院时间和 48 小时内的谵妄;也可观察到昏迷。两个研究组的最终转运 RASS 分别为-4.43±0.49 和-1.5±0.5(P <0.0001)。两组患者的平均住院时间分别为(13.01±4.8)天和(35±5.9)天(P<0.0001)。深度镇静组的住院死亡率、谵妄和昏迷病例比例较高(P<0.0001)。将患者护理从转运团队转移到医院团队是一个机会,有可能中断治疗进程并重新评估有关镇静的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信