Exploring accessible, inclusive and sustainable simulation-based education in remote and rural communities: a realist review

Susan Somerville, Stella Howden, Jean Ker, Susie Schofield
{"title":"Exploring accessible, inclusive and sustainable simulation-based education in remote and rural communities: a realist review","authors":"Susan Somerville, Stella Howden, Jean Ker, Susie Schofield","doi":"10.54531/porh1951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to and inclusion in simulation-based education (SBE) for remote and rural (RR) healthcare practitioners, irrespective of geographic setting, professional background and workplace context, is challenging. This challenge is compounded because simulation in healthcare education is acknowledged as a complex intervention, and healthcare systems are in and of themselves complex.\n A realist review of published and grey literature was conducted, seeking to identify programme theories and to explore what works, how and why, in respect of mobile and distance SBE for healthcare practitioners in RR and harder-to-reach communities.\n There is limited rigorous research in this field. Mobile and distance simulation programmes exist in physical, digital and hybrid forms. This makes simulation more accessible and inclusive for RR healthcare professionals in respect of facilitating simulation. It allows for clinical and simulation centres of expertise to collaborate with harder-to-reach communities enabling the contextualizing of learning with, from and about the needs of a target population. However, the challenges of implementing and sustaining mobile and distance simulation interventions are underexplored.\n Mobile and distance programmes of SBE are introduced into and are subject to dynamic and heterogeneous social contexts. The intended outcomes of such programmes are dependent on building relationships, trust and networks between geographically distanced communities of practice. These social connections are the key mechanisms which support accessibility, inclusivity and sustainability. Further explorations of mobile and distance simulation innovations are critical to building capacity, sustainable solutions and enhancing future use.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/porh1951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to and inclusion in simulation-based education (SBE) for remote and rural (RR) healthcare practitioners, irrespective of geographic setting, professional background and workplace context, is challenging. This challenge is compounded because simulation in healthcare education is acknowledged as a complex intervention, and healthcare systems are in and of themselves complex. A realist review of published and grey literature was conducted, seeking to identify programme theories and to explore what works, how and why, in respect of mobile and distance SBE for healthcare practitioners in RR and harder-to-reach communities. There is limited rigorous research in this field. Mobile and distance simulation programmes exist in physical, digital and hybrid forms. This makes simulation more accessible and inclusive for RR healthcare professionals in respect of facilitating simulation. It allows for clinical and simulation centres of expertise to collaborate with harder-to-reach communities enabling the contextualizing of learning with, from and about the needs of a target population. However, the challenges of implementing and sustaining mobile and distance simulation interventions are underexplored. Mobile and distance programmes of SBE are introduced into and are subject to dynamic and heterogeneous social contexts. The intended outcomes of such programmes are dependent on building relationships, trust and networks between geographically distanced communities of practice. These social connections are the key mechanisms which support accessibility, inclusivity and sustainability. Further explorations of mobile and distance simulation innovations are critical to building capacity, sustainable solutions and enhancing future use.
探索偏远和农村社区的无障碍、包容性和可持续模拟教育:现实主义审查
无论地理环境、专业背景和工作环境如何,偏远和农村地区(RR)的医疗保健从业人员都很难获得并融入模拟教育(SBE)。由于医疗保健教育中的模拟被认为是一种复杂的干预措施,而医疗保健系统本身也是复杂的,因此这一挑战变得更加复杂。我们对已发表的文献和灰色文献进行了现实主义审查,以确定计划理论,并探讨在为 RR 和较难接触到的社区的医疗保健从业人员提供移动和远程医疗保健教育方面,哪些方法有效、如何有效以及为什么有效。这一领域的严谨研究十分有限。移动和远程模拟课程以实体、数字和混合形式存在。在促进模拟方面,这使 RR 医疗保健专业人员更容易接触到模拟,并具有包容性。它使临床和模拟专家中心能够与较难接触到的社区合作,从而能够根据目标人群的需要,从他们身上学习并了解他们的需要。然而,在实施和维持移动和远程模拟干预措施方面所面临的挑战尚未得到充分探讨。移动和远程职业教育计划被引入并受制于动态和异质的社会环境。这些计划的预期成果取决于在地理上相距遥远的实践社区之间建立关系、信任和网络。这些社会联系是支持可及性、包容性和可持续性的关键机制。进一步探索移动和远程模拟创新对于能力建设、可持续的解决方案和加强未来的使用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信