Looking at human healthcare to improve agricultural service delivery: The case of online chatgroups

Šarūnas Jomantas, Anna Wood, Nyamwaya Munthali, Willis Ochilo, M. Thakur, Dannie Romney, Mariam Kadzamira
{"title":"Looking at human healthcare to improve agricultural service delivery: The case of online chatgroups","authors":"Šarūnas Jomantas, Anna Wood, Nyamwaya Munthali, Willis Ochilo, M. Thakur, Dannie Romney, Mariam Kadzamira","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyses the opportunities and pitfalls of using chatgroups for plant health systems. It also examines the conditions for strengthening chatroom functions and considers the possibility of replicating reported successes in healthcare settings to plant health systems. We use mixed qualitative methods, which include stakeholder surveys and observation of chatgroup activity interactions in Ghana, Kenya, Uganda and Sri Lanka. Our findings show that there is evidence of the benefits of chatgroups to human health which can be replicated in plant health. Replication should, however, not be a ‘copy and paste’ approach. This is due to the general lack of evidence-based guidelines and lessons learned to move beyond the initial adoption success of communication applications. Also, in practice, plant doctor chatgroups are generally much larger than groups in healthcare settings and it remains to be seen whether increasing chatroom activity could benefit specific plant health objectives; or whether it would lead to increased labour costs, and/or diminish the participation of plant doctors.\n \n \n The article is relevant in a One Health context as it demonstrates that there is a lot to learn between sectors about interventions and approaches. The work used literature from human health interventions to shed light on how a similar intervention in plant health functioned and could be improved. It shows that if actors in the plant health sector had engaged early on with actors in the human health sector, they may have avoided pitfalls in the ways that chatgroups can be used to support plant health management. It is expected that human, animal and plant health sectors would benefit from the knowledge and recommendations in this article to establish new online chatgroups that can support transformative change.\n","PeriodicalId":481147,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"338 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CABI One Health","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the opportunities and pitfalls of using chatgroups for plant health systems. It also examines the conditions for strengthening chatroom functions and considers the possibility of replicating reported successes in healthcare settings to plant health systems. We use mixed qualitative methods, which include stakeholder surveys and observation of chatgroup activity interactions in Ghana, Kenya, Uganda and Sri Lanka. Our findings show that there is evidence of the benefits of chatgroups to human health which can be replicated in plant health. Replication should, however, not be a ‘copy and paste’ approach. This is due to the general lack of evidence-based guidelines and lessons learned to move beyond the initial adoption success of communication applications. Also, in practice, plant doctor chatgroups are generally much larger than groups in healthcare settings and it remains to be seen whether increasing chatroom activity could benefit specific plant health objectives; or whether it would lead to increased labour costs, and/or diminish the participation of plant doctors. The article is relevant in a One Health context as it demonstrates that there is a lot to learn between sectors about interventions and approaches. The work used literature from human health interventions to shed light on how a similar intervention in plant health functioned and could be improved. It shows that if actors in the plant health sector had engaged early on with actors in the human health sector, they may have avoided pitfalls in the ways that chatgroups can be used to support plant health management. It is expected that human, animal and plant health sectors would benefit from the knowledge and recommendations in this article to establish new online chatgroups that can support transformative change.
关注人类保健,改善农业服务提供:在线聊天群组案例
本研究分析了植物健康系统使用聊天室的机遇和隐患。研究还探讨了加强聊天室功能的条件,并考虑了将医疗保健环境中的成功经验复制到植物健康系统中的可能性。我们采用了混合定性方法,包括利益相关者调查和观察加纳、肯尼亚、乌干达和斯里兰卡的聊天组活动互动。我们的研究结果表明,有证据表明聊天群组对人类健康有益,可以在植物健康领域推广。但是,复制不应采用 "复制和粘贴 "的方法。这是因为普遍缺乏基于证据的指导原则和经验教训,无法超越通信应用最初的成功应用。此外,在实践中,植物医生聊天群组通常比医疗保健环境中的群组要大得多,增加聊天室活动是否有利于实现特定的植物健康目标,或者是否会导致劳动力成本增加和/或减少植物医生的参与,这些都有待观察。 这篇文章在 "一体健康 "背景下很有意义,因为它表明各部门在干预措施和方法方面有很多值得学习的地方。这项工作利用人类健康干预措施的文献资料,阐明了植物健康领域类似干预措施的运作方式,并可加以改进。它表明,如果植物健康部门的参与者能尽早与人类健康部门的参与者合作,他们就可能避免聊天群组用于支持植物健康管理的方式中的陷阱。预计人类、动物和植物健康部门将从本文的知识和建议中受益,从而建立新的在线聊天群组,支持转型变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信