Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance

Pia V. Ingold, A. L. Heimann, Simon M. Breil
{"title":"Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance","authors":"Pia V. Ingold, A. L. Heimann, Simon M. Breil","doi":"10.1017/iop.2024.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study generates new insights on the role of initial impressions in assessment centers. Drawing from the “thin slices” of behavior paradigm in personality and social psychology, we investigate to what extent initial impressions of assessees—based on different slices of assessment center exercises (i.e., two minutes at the beginning, middle, and end of AC exercises)—are consistent across and within AC exercises, and are relevant for predicting assessment center performance and job performance. Employed individuals (N = 223) participated in three interactive assessment center exercises, while being observed and evaluated by trained assessors. Based upon video-recordings of all assessment center exercises, a different, untrained group of raters subsequently provided ratings of their general initial impressions of assessees for the beginning, middle, and end of each exercise. As criterion measure, supervisors rated assessees’ job performance. Results show that initial impressions in assessment centers are (a) relatively stable, (b) consistently predict assessment center performance across different slices of behavior (i.e., across the three time points and exercises), and (c) mostly relate to job performance.","PeriodicalId":515605,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study generates new insights on the role of initial impressions in assessment centers. Drawing from the “thin slices” of behavior paradigm in personality and social psychology, we investigate to what extent initial impressions of assessees—based on different slices of assessment center exercises (i.e., two minutes at the beginning, middle, and end of AC exercises)—are consistent across and within AC exercises, and are relevant for predicting assessment center performance and job performance. Employed individuals (N = 223) participated in three interactive assessment center exercises, while being observed and evaluated by trained assessors. Based upon video-recordings of all assessment center exercises, a different, untrained group of raters subsequently provided ratings of their general initial impressions of assessees for the beginning, middle, and end of each exercise. As criterion measure, supervisors rated assessees’ job performance. Results show that initial impressions in assessment centers are (a) relatively stable, (b) consistently predict assessment center performance across different slices of behavior (i.e., across the three time points and exercises), and (c) mostly relate to job performance.
任何切片都具有预测性?评估中心练习开始、中间和结束时印象的一致性及其与成绩的关系
本研究对评估中心初始印象的作用提出了新的见解。借鉴人格和社会心理学中的 "薄片 "行为范式,我们研究了基于评估中心练习的不同片段(即评估中心练习开始、中间和结束时的两分钟)的受测者初始印象在不同评估中心练习之间和内部的一致性,以及与预测评估中心表现和工作表现的相关性。受雇人员(N = 223)参加了三次互动式评估中心练习,并接受了训练有素的评估员的观察和评估。根据评估中心所有练习的视频记录,一组不同的、未经培训的评估员随后对每次练习的开头、中间和结尾对受测者的总体初步印象进行评分。作为衡量标准,主管人员对被测评者的工作表现进行评分。结果表明,评估中心的初步印象(a)相对稳定;(b)在不同的行为片段中(即在三个时间点和练习中)能够持续预测评估中心的绩效;(c)主要与工作绩效相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信