A Three-Arm Delphi Process for Exploring Australian Radiography Stakeholder Prioritisation of Graduate Skill Development and their Perception of How Often These Skills are Demonstrated by Graduate Radiographers

B. Osborne, Steven Milanese, Gisela van Kessel, Sharron King, K. Thoirs
{"title":"A Three-Arm Delphi Process for Exploring Australian Radiography Stakeholder Prioritisation of Graduate Skill Development and their Perception of How Often These Skills are Demonstrated by Graduate Radiographers","authors":"B. Osborne, Steven Milanese, Gisela van Kessel, Sharron King, K. Thoirs","doi":"10.59197/asrhe.v5i1.8359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clinical skills education requires commitment from academic staff, clinical supervisors, and the students themselves to ensure the attainment of specific learning goals. The aims of this study were to identify specific skill areas that radiography education stakeholders feel are important to develop in Australian radiography students, and to evaluate how frequently the stakeholders believe graduate radiographers demonstrate these skills.\nMethods: A three-arm Delphi process of consensus development was used to survey radiography academic educators, radiographers, and radiography students as three separate expert groups. Three to four rounds covered the nomination of professional skills important to participants, the rating and ranking of importance of these skills, and identification of how well the stakeholder groups feel graduate radiographers demonstrate these skills.\nResults: Twenty-four stakeholders participated in the study. Thirty-four professional capabilities were identified as being important by at least one stakeholder group. Six capabilities were rated as being very or extremely important by all groups with no large differences of ratings identified between groups for the remaining capabilities. The student group felt that graduate radiographers demonstrate identified clinical skills more frequently than was perceived by the other groups. \nConclusion: The agreement between radiographer education stakeholder groups as to the importance of identified professional capabilities indicates that each group is likely to place similar emphases on the teaching and learning of these skills. Differences of opinion between students and educators around student/graduate performance levels can inform areas for improvement in student performance and educator feedback approaches.","PeriodicalId":470188,"journal":{"name":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59197/asrhe.v5i1.8359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical skills education requires commitment from academic staff, clinical supervisors, and the students themselves to ensure the attainment of specific learning goals. The aims of this study were to identify specific skill areas that radiography education stakeholders feel are important to develop in Australian radiography students, and to evaluate how frequently the stakeholders believe graduate radiographers demonstrate these skills. Methods: A three-arm Delphi process of consensus development was used to survey radiography academic educators, radiographers, and radiography students as three separate expert groups. Three to four rounds covered the nomination of professional skills important to participants, the rating and ranking of importance of these skills, and identification of how well the stakeholder groups feel graduate radiographers demonstrate these skills. Results: Twenty-four stakeholders participated in the study. Thirty-four professional capabilities were identified as being important by at least one stakeholder group. Six capabilities were rated as being very or extremely important by all groups with no large differences of ratings identified between groups for the remaining capabilities. The student group felt that graduate radiographers demonstrate identified clinical skills more frequently than was perceived by the other groups.  Conclusion: The agreement between radiographer education stakeholder groups as to the importance of identified professional capabilities indicates that each group is likely to place similar emphases on the teaching and learning of these skills. Differences of opinion between students and educators around student/graduate performance levels can inform areas for improvement in student performance and educator feedback approaches.
三臂德尔菲法探究澳大利亚放射学利益相关者对毕业生技能发展的重视程度以及他们对放射技师毕业生展示这些技能的频率的看法
导言:临床技能教育需要教学人员、临床督导和学生自身的努力,以确保实现特定的学习目标。本研究的目的是确定放射学教育相关人员认为对澳大利亚放射学学生而言非常重要的特定技能领域,并评估相关人员认为放射技师毕业生展示这些技能的频率:方法:采用三臂德尔菲法达成共识,将放射学学术教育工作者、放射技师和放射学学生作为三个独立的专家组进行调查。三到四轮调查涵盖了对参与者而言重要的专业技能提名、这些技能重要性的评级和排序,以及确定利益相关群体认为放射学专业毕业生在多大程度上展现了这些技能:结果:24 位利益相关者参与了研究。至少有一个利益相关群体认为 34 项专业能力非常重要。有六项能力被所有群体评为非常重要或极其重要,其余能力在不同群体之间的评分差异不大。学生群体认为,放射技师毕业后比其他群体更经常地展示已确定的临床技能。结论:放射技师教育相关群体对已确定的专业能力重要性的一致看法表明,每个群体都可能对这些技能的教学和学习给予类似的重视。学生和教育者在学生/毕业生表现水平方面的意见分歧可以为学生表现和教育者反馈方法的改进提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信