Double-blind comparison of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria.

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
T Cainelli, S Seidenari, R Valsecchi, M Mosca
{"title":"Double-blind comparison of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria.","authors":"T Cainelli,&nbsp;S Seidenari,&nbsp;R Valsecchi,&nbsp;M Mosca","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two new non-sedating antihistamines, astemizole (10 mg per day) and terfenadine (120 mg per day), were compared in a double-blind randomized study in 42 adult patients suffering from chronic urticaria. The trial lasted 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks and kept a daily diary of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant decrease in pruritus, erythema and urticaria papules in both groups throughout the study. Changes in papule size, number and frequency were greater in the astemizole group though not significantly different to the terfenadine group. The effect of astemizole increased with time whereas that of terfenadine decreased after about 3 weeks of treatment. Astemizole was globally considered to be the most effective drug by both investigator and patients, with excellent/good results in 77% of the patients compared with 55% to 60% in the terfenadine group. Both drugs were reported to be more effective and faster acting than other antihistamines taken previously. Side-effects were infrequent and minor in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 10","pages":"679-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two new non-sedating antihistamines, astemizole (10 mg per day) and terfenadine (120 mg per day), were compared in a double-blind randomized study in 42 adult patients suffering from chronic urticaria. The trial lasted 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks and kept a daily diary of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant decrease in pruritus, erythema and urticaria papules in both groups throughout the study. Changes in papule size, number and frequency were greater in the astemizole group though not significantly different to the terfenadine group. The effect of astemizole increased with time whereas that of terfenadine decreased after about 3 weeks of treatment. Astemizole was globally considered to be the most effective drug by both investigator and patients, with excellent/good results in 77% of the patients compared with 55% to 60% in the terfenadine group. Both drugs were reported to be more effective and faster acting than other antihistamines taken previously. Side-effects were infrequent and minor in both groups.

阿司咪唑与特非那定治疗慢性荨麻疹的双盲比较。
在一项对42例慢性荨麻疹成年患者的双盲随机研究中,比较了两种新的非镇静抗组胺药阿司咪唑(每天10毫克)和特非那定(每天120毫克)。试验期4周。在第2周和第4周对患者进行评估,并记录每日症状日记。在整个研究过程中,两组患者的瘙痒、红斑和荨麻疹丘疹的发生率均有统计学上的显著下降。阿司咪唑组的丘疹大小、数量和频率变化较大,但与特非那定组无显著差异。阿司咪唑的作用随时间增加而增加,而特非那定的作用在治疗约3周后下降。阿司咪唑在全球范围内被研究者和患者认为是最有效的药物,77%的患者获得优异/良好的结果,而特非那定组为55%至60%。据报道,这两种药物比以前服用的其他抗组胺药更有效,作用更快。两组的副作用都很少,而且都很轻微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信