Assessments of Gravity Data Gridding Using Various Interpolation Approaches for High-Resolution Geoid Computations

Onur Karaca, B. Erol, S. Erol
{"title":"Assessments of Gravity Data Gridding Using Various Interpolation Approaches for High-Resolution Geoid Computations","authors":"Onur Karaca, B. Erol, S. Erol","doi":"10.3390/geosciences14030085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the role of different approaches and interpolation methods in gridding terrestrial gravity anomalies. In this regard, first of all, simple and complete Bouguer anomalies are considered in gravity data gridding. In the comparison results of gridding these two Bouguer anomaly datasets, the effect of the high-frequency contribution of topographic gravitation (by means of the terrain correction) is clarified. After that, the role of the used interpolation algorithm on the resulting grid of mean gravity anomalies and hence on the geoid modeling accuracy is inspected. For this purpose, four different interpolation methods including geostatistical Kriging, nearest neighbor, inverse distance to a power (IDP), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are applied. Here, the IDP and nearest neighbor methods represent simple-structured algorithms among the interpolation methods tested in this study. The ANN method, on the other hand, is preferred as a complex, optimization-based soft computing method that has been applied in recent years. In addition, the geostatistical Kriging method is one of the conventional methods that is mostly applied for gridding gravity data in geodesy and geophysics. The calculated gravity anomalies in grids are employed in high-resolution geoid model computations using the least squares modifications of Stokes formula with additive corrections (LSMSA) technique. The investigations are carried out using the test datasets of Auvergne, France that are provided by the International Service for the Geoid for scientific research. It is concluded that the interpolation algorithms affect the gravity gridding results and hence the geoid model determination. The ANN method does not provide superior results compared to the conventional algorithms in gravity gridding. The geoid model with 4.1 cm accuracy is computed in the test area.","PeriodicalId":509137,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the role of different approaches and interpolation methods in gridding terrestrial gravity anomalies. In this regard, first of all, simple and complete Bouguer anomalies are considered in gravity data gridding. In the comparison results of gridding these two Bouguer anomaly datasets, the effect of the high-frequency contribution of topographic gravitation (by means of the terrain correction) is clarified. After that, the role of the used interpolation algorithm on the resulting grid of mean gravity anomalies and hence on the geoid modeling accuracy is inspected. For this purpose, four different interpolation methods including geostatistical Kriging, nearest neighbor, inverse distance to a power (IDP), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are applied. Here, the IDP and nearest neighbor methods represent simple-structured algorithms among the interpolation methods tested in this study. The ANN method, on the other hand, is preferred as a complex, optimization-based soft computing method that has been applied in recent years. In addition, the geostatistical Kriging method is one of the conventional methods that is mostly applied for gridding gravity data in geodesy and geophysics. The calculated gravity anomalies in grids are employed in high-resolution geoid model computations using the least squares modifications of Stokes formula with additive corrections (LSMSA) technique. The investigations are carried out using the test datasets of Auvergne, France that are provided by the International Service for the Geoid for scientific research. It is concluded that the interpolation algorithms affect the gravity gridding results and hence the geoid model determination. The ANN method does not provide superior results compared to the conventional algorithms in gravity gridding. The geoid model with 4.1 cm accuracy is computed in the test area.
利用各种插值方法评估重力数据网格划分,以进行高分辨率大地水准面计算
本文研究了不同方法和插值法在陆地重力异常网格划分中的作用。在这方面,首先考虑了重力数据网格划分中的简单布格尔异常和完整布格尔异常。在对这两种布格尔异常数据集进行网格划分的比较结果中,明确了地形重力(通过地形校正)的高频贡献的影响。随后,检查了所使用的插值算法对平均重力异常网格结果的作用,以及由此对大地水准面建模精度的影响。为此,应用了四种不同的插值方法,包括地质统计克里金法、最近邻法、反比距离法(IDP)和人工神经网络法(ANN)。在本研究测试的插值方法中,IDP 和近邻法代表了结构简单的算法。而 ANN 方法则是近年来应用的一种复杂的、基于优化的软计算方法。此外,大地统计克里金法是大地测量学和地球物理学中用于重力数据网格划分的常规方法之一。网格中计算出的重力异常被用于高分辨率大地水准面模型计算,使用的是斯托克斯公式的最小二乘修正加法修正(LSMSA)技术。研究使用了国际大地水准面服务机构为科学研究提供的法国奥弗涅测试数据集。结论是插值算法会影响重力网格划分结果,进而影响大地水准面模型的确定。与重力网格划分的传统算法相比,ANN 方法的结果并不出众。在测试区域计算出了精度为 4.1 厘米的大地水准面模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信