{"title":"Monitoring Transformation Processes in the Economy Using the Example of the IT Industry","authors":"V. Kogdenko","doi":"10.26794/2408-9303-2024-11-1-14-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to develop and test a methodology for monitoring transformation processes in the economy that intensified after the introduction of sanctions by Western countries (on the example of the IT-industry). The methodology is based on the Harvard paradigm of industry analysis (Structure- Conduct- Performance) and includes five stages. At the first, the basic conditions of the industry are assessed and the demographics of enterprises, industry barriers, intensity of competition and economies of scale are analyzed. The second analyzes the market structure that has developed in the industry and the intensity of competition using the concentration coefficient and the Herfindahl- Hirschman index. At the third stage, the behavior of industry enterprises is analyzed on the basis of summary statements and consolidated reports, as well as median values of indicators for enterprises. In the course of analyzing the behavior of enterprises, their market and operational efficiency, investment and financial activity are assessed. The type of growth and productivity of production factors is established by constructing the industry production function. Particular attention is paid to indicators of transformation processes — added value, labor productivity and return on capital. At the fourth stage, industry enterprises are grouped into four groups according to D. Birch’s method: fast-growing enterprises, large businesses, enterprises implementing an aggressive investment strategy and the rest of small businesses. At the fifth stage, indicators of the effectiveness of state economic policy are assessed. Calculations performed based on data from 2,451 enterprises in the IT industry showed that transformation processes in the industry have intensified, new enterprises are entering the industry, their operational and market activity is increasing, non-current assets and equity capital are growing. However, payments for investment activities do not allow us to draw an unambiguous conclusion about high investment activity; in addition, there is no significant influx of long-term borrowed capital into the industry, which hinders its development. Positive changes in the industry are largely associated with active government policy, which promotes the transition to domestic software, influencing the methods of fiscal policy, while monetary policy instruments are not used actively enough. The methodological basis of the study was formed by general scientific principles and methods: abstraction, generalisation of approaches of foreign and domestic authors to sectoral analysis, grouping, comparison, generalisation, as well as economic and mathematical methods. The result of the work is the methodology of industry monitoring, as well as the indicators of IT-industry development for the period 2018–2022 obtained during its testing. The article may be useful for analysts assessing the development of industries within the framework of industry analysis or industrial policy monitoring.","PeriodicalId":221305,"journal":{"name":"Accounting. Analysis. Auditing","volume":"45 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting. Analysis. Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2024-11-1-14-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to develop and test a methodology for monitoring transformation processes in the economy that intensified after the introduction of sanctions by Western countries (on the example of the IT-industry). The methodology is based on the Harvard paradigm of industry analysis (Structure- Conduct- Performance) and includes five stages. At the first, the basic conditions of the industry are assessed and the demographics of enterprises, industry barriers, intensity of competition and economies of scale are analyzed. The second analyzes the market structure that has developed in the industry and the intensity of competition using the concentration coefficient and the Herfindahl- Hirschman index. At the third stage, the behavior of industry enterprises is analyzed on the basis of summary statements and consolidated reports, as well as median values of indicators for enterprises. In the course of analyzing the behavior of enterprises, their market and operational efficiency, investment and financial activity are assessed. The type of growth and productivity of production factors is established by constructing the industry production function. Particular attention is paid to indicators of transformation processes — added value, labor productivity and return on capital. At the fourth stage, industry enterprises are grouped into four groups according to D. Birch’s method: fast-growing enterprises, large businesses, enterprises implementing an aggressive investment strategy and the rest of small businesses. At the fifth stage, indicators of the effectiveness of state economic policy are assessed. Calculations performed based on data from 2,451 enterprises in the IT industry showed that transformation processes in the industry have intensified, new enterprises are entering the industry, their operational and market activity is increasing, non-current assets and equity capital are growing. However, payments for investment activities do not allow us to draw an unambiguous conclusion about high investment activity; in addition, there is no significant influx of long-term borrowed capital into the industry, which hinders its development. Positive changes in the industry are largely associated with active government policy, which promotes the transition to domestic software, influencing the methods of fiscal policy, while monetary policy instruments are not used actively enough. The methodological basis of the study was formed by general scientific principles and methods: abstraction, generalisation of approaches of foreign and domestic authors to sectoral analysis, grouping, comparison, generalisation, as well as economic and mathematical methods. The result of the work is the methodology of industry monitoring, as well as the indicators of IT-industry development for the period 2018–2022 obtained during its testing. The article may be useful for analysts assessing the development of industries within the framework of industry analysis or industrial policy monitoring.
研究的目的是开发和测试一种方法,用于监测西方国家实施制裁后经济转型进程的加强情况(以信息技术产业为例)。该方法以哈佛产业分析范式(结构-行为-绩效)为基础,包括五个阶段。首先,对行业的基本条件进行评估,分析企业人口、行业壁垒、竞争强度和规模经济。第二阶段,利用集中系数和赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数分析该行业已形成的市场结构和竞争强度。第三阶段,根据汇总报表和合并报告以及企业指标中值分析行业企业的行为。在分析企业行为的过程中,对其市场和运营效率、投资和金融活动进行评估。通过构建行业生产函数来确定生产要素的增长类型和生产率。其中特别关注转化过程的指标--附加值、劳动生产率和资本回报率。在第四阶段,根据 D. Birch 的方法将工业企业分为四组:快速增长企业、大型企业、实施积极投资战略的企业和其他小型企业。在第五阶段,对国家经济政策的有效性指标进行评估。根据 2 451 家 IT 行业企业的数据进行的计算显示,该行业的转型进程已经加强,新企业正在进入该行业,其业务和市场活动正在增加,非流动资产和权益资本正在增长。然而,投资活动的付款情况并不能让我们对投资活动的高涨得出明确的结论;此外,长期借贷资本也没有大量涌入该行业,这阻碍了该行业的发展。该行业的积极变化在很大程度上与政府的积极政策有关,这些政策促进了向国产软件的过渡,影响了财政政策的方法,而货币政策工具的使用则不够积极。研究的方法论基础由一般科学原则和方法构成:抽象、概括国内外作者的部门分析方法、分组、比较、概括以及经济和数学方法。工作成果是行业监测方法,以及在测试过程中获得的 2018-2022 年 IT 行业发展指标。文章可能对在产业分析或产业政策监测框架内评估产业发展的分析师有所帮助。