Who is using ChatGPT and why?: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model

Sangwon Lee, Mo Jones-Jang, Myojung Chung, Nuri Kim, Jihyang Choi
{"title":"Who is using ChatGPT and why?: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model","authors":"Sangwon Lee, Mo Jones-Jang, Myojung Chung, Nuri Kim, Jihyang Choi","doi":"10.47989/ir291647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Since its public launch, ChatGPT has gained the world's attention, demonstrating the immense potential of artificial intelligence (AI).\nMethod. To explore factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT, we ran structural equation modelling to test the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model while incorporating relative risk (vs. benefit) perception and emotional factors into its original form to gain a better understanding of the process.\nAnalysis. This study utilized partial least squares–structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS4.\nResults. The findings revealed that in addition to individuals' technology-specific perceptions (i.e., performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions), relative risk perception and emotional factors play significant roles in predicting favourable attitude and behaviour intentions towards ChatGPT.\nConclusions. Our extended model fits the data well, suggesting that it is not merely a matter of convenience but also of people's reservations, expectations, and emotions toward technology, which significantly influence their willingness to adopt ChatGPT.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Research an international electronic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir291647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Since its public launch, ChatGPT has gained the world's attention, demonstrating the immense potential of artificial intelligence (AI). Method. To explore factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT, we ran structural equation modelling to test the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model while incorporating relative risk (vs. benefit) perception and emotional factors into its original form to gain a better understanding of the process. Analysis. This study utilized partial least squares–structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS4. Results. The findings revealed that in addition to individuals' technology-specific perceptions (i.e., performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions), relative risk perception and emotional factors play significant roles in predicting favourable attitude and behaviour intentions towards ChatGPT. Conclusions. Our extended model fits the data well, suggesting that it is not merely a matter of convenience but also of people's reservations, expectations, and emotions toward technology, which significantly influence their willingness to adopt ChatGPT.
谁在使用 ChatGPT,为什么?
简介:自公开发布以来,ChatGPT 得到了全世界的关注,展示了人工智能(AI)的巨大潜力。自公开发布以来,ChatGPT 就赢得了全世界的关注,展示了人工智能(AI)的巨大潜力。为了探索影响 ChatGPT 应用的因素,我们采用结构方程模型来检验技术接受和使用模型的统一理论,同时将相对风险(与收益)感知和情感因素纳入其原始形式,以便更好地理解这一过程。本研究利用 SmartPLS4 进行偏最小二乘法结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)。研究结果表明,除了个人的特定技术感知(即性能预期、努力预期、社会影响和便利条件)外,相对风险感知和情感因素在预测对 ChatGPT 的好感态度和行为意向方面起着重要作用。我们的扩展模型很好地拟合了数据,表明人们采用 ChatGPT 的意愿不仅与便利性有关,还与人们对技术的保留、期望和情感有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信