A prospective, randomized, blinded study on the efficacy of using corticosteroids in hydrodilatation as a treatment for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder

Joan Tomàs Gebellí-Jové, Antonio Buñuel-Viñau, Marta Canela-Capdevila, Jordi Camps, Fàtima Sabench, Petrea Iftimie-Iftimie
{"title":"A prospective, randomized, blinded study on the efficacy of using corticosteroids in hydrodilatation as a treatment for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder","authors":"Joan Tomàs Gebellí-Jové, Antonio Buñuel-Viñau, Marta Canela-Capdevila, Jordi Camps, Fàtima Sabench, Petrea Iftimie-Iftimie","doi":"10.1177/17585732241239030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare hydrodilatation with or without corticosteroid administration on the outcomes of patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. This was a prospective, randomized, blinded study of 82 patients with adhesive capsulitis treated with hydrodilatation with corticosteroids (HDC) or without corticosteroids (HDA). Assessments were performed at 48 h and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain in HDC patients was significantly lower after 48 h of treatment than that of HDA, and the functional scales were better after the first month. These differences were maintained after 1 year. (visual analog scale: 0.8 vs. 1.6, p = 0.018; shoulder pain and disability index: 4.8 vs. 9.8, p = 0.003; simple shoulder test: 11.4 vs. 8.7, p = 0.008; subjective shoulder value: 96.6 vs. 90.1, p = 0.024). We found that hydrodilatation with corticosteroids improved pain levels, shoulder function, and subjective perception of shoulder status compared to hydrodilatation without corticosteroids.","PeriodicalId":507613,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder & Elbow","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder & Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241239030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare hydrodilatation with or without corticosteroid administration on the outcomes of patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. This was a prospective, randomized, blinded study of 82 patients with adhesive capsulitis treated with hydrodilatation with corticosteroids (HDC) or without corticosteroids (HDA). Assessments were performed at 48 h and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain in HDC patients was significantly lower after 48 h of treatment than that of HDA, and the functional scales were better after the first month. These differences were maintained after 1 year. (visual analog scale: 0.8 vs. 1.6, p = 0.018; shoulder pain and disability index: 4.8 vs. 9.8, p = 0.003; simple shoulder test: 11.4 vs. 8.7, p = 0.008; subjective shoulder value: 96.6 vs. 90.1, p = 0.024). We found that hydrodilatation with corticosteroids improved pain levels, shoulder function, and subjective perception of shoulder status compared to hydrodilatation without corticosteroids.
关于使用皮质类固醇水扩张术治疗肩关节粘连性囊炎疗效的前瞻性、随机、盲法研究
本研究旨在比较水动力扩张术加皮质类固醇或不加皮质类固醇对肩关节粘连性囊炎患者疗效的影响。这是一项前瞻性、随机、盲法研究,82 名粘连性肩关节囊炎患者接受了含皮质类固醇(HDC)或不含皮质类固醇(HDA)的水动力扩张术治疗。在 48 小时、1、3、6 和 12 个月时进行评估。治疗 48 小时后,HDC 患者的疼痛明显低于 HDA 患者,第一个月后的功能量表也更好。这些差异在 1 年后得以保持。(视觉模拟量表0.8 vs. 1.6,p = 0.018;肩痛和残疾指数:4.8 vs. 9.8,p = 0.018):4.8 vs. 9.8,p = 0.003;简单肩关节测试:11.4 vs. 8.7,p = 0.003):11.4 vs. 8.7,p = 0.008;肩部主观值:96.6 vs. 90.1,p = 0.024)。我们发现,与不使用皮质类固醇的水动力扩张术相比,使用皮质类固醇的水动力扩张术可改善疼痛程度、肩关节功能和肩关节的主观感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信