Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different combinations of beans

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Z.J. Tan, M.F. Abu Bakar, S.Y. Lim, H. Sutimin
{"title":"Nutritional composition and sensory evaluation of tempeh from different\ncombinations of beans","authors":"Z.J. Tan, M.F. Abu Bakar, S.Y. Lim, H. Sutimin","doi":"10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tempeh is recognised as an excellent source of plant protein and a promising meat\nsubstitute in the diet. Recently, the development of tempeh by blending different legumes\nhas gained more attention, but references are limited. This study aimed to develop tempeh\ncombinations of soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans. The physical\ncharacteristics of the tempeh samples were recorded, and their nutritional compositions\nwere determined in accordance with the standard AOAC methods. A sensory evaluation\nwas also conducted by using the hedonic 9-scale test to study the overall acceptance of the\ntempeh. Our results indicated that the soybean and chickpea tempeh combination\ncontained 31.08±0.41% protein, 9.88±1.42% fat, 16.57±1.90% carbohydrates,\n13.49±0.03% crude fibre, 4.40±0.02% dietary fibre, 39.91±0.23% moisture, and\n2.57±0.21% ash content per 100 g. Meanwhile, the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh\ncombination had 30.39±0.12% protein, 9.43±1.02% fat, 13.31±0.78% carbohydrates,\n11.88±0.03% crude fibre, 2.50±0.02% dietary fibre, 44.17±0.03% moisture, and\n2.70±0.26% ash content per 100 g. Both mixed bean tempeh samples demonstrated high\nnutritional value. However, the sensory evaluation showed that the soybean and red\nkidney bean tempeh combination was preferred by most panellists due to its appearance,\ntexture, taste, and aroma, with the highest overall acceptance score (7.54±0.85). In\nconclusion, our study highlights the potential of blending soybean with chickpeas and red\nkidney beans to develop tempeh with a high nutritional value. These findings could have\nsignificant implications for developing plant-based meat substitutes with desirable\nnutritional and sensory properties.","PeriodicalId":12410,"journal":{"name":"Food Research","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(2).088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tempeh is recognised as an excellent source of plant protein and a promising meat substitute in the diet. Recently, the development of tempeh by blending different legumes has gained more attention, but references are limited. This study aimed to develop tempeh combinations of soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans. The physical characteristics of the tempeh samples were recorded, and their nutritional compositions were determined in accordance with the standard AOAC methods. A sensory evaluation was also conducted by using the hedonic 9-scale test to study the overall acceptance of the tempeh. Our results indicated that the soybean and chickpea tempeh combination contained 31.08±0.41% protein, 9.88±1.42% fat, 16.57±1.90% carbohydrates, 13.49±0.03% crude fibre, 4.40±0.02% dietary fibre, 39.91±0.23% moisture, and 2.57±0.21% ash content per 100 g. Meanwhile, the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination had 30.39±0.12% protein, 9.43±1.02% fat, 13.31±0.78% carbohydrates, 11.88±0.03% crude fibre, 2.50±0.02% dietary fibre, 44.17±0.03% moisture, and 2.70±0.26% ash content per 100 g. Both mixed bean tempeh samples demonstrated high nutritional value. However, the sensory evaluation showed that the soybean and red kidney bean tempeh combination was preferred by most panellists due to its appearance, texture, taste, and aroma, with the highest overall acceptance score (7.54±0.85). In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of blending soybean with chickpeas and red kidney beans to develop tempeh with a high nutritional value. These findings could have significant implications for developing plant-based meat substitutes with desirable nutritional and sensory properties.
不同豆类组合豆豉的营养成分和感官评价
豆豉被认为是植物蛋白的绝佳来源,也是一种很有前景的肉类替代品。最近,通过混合不同豆类来开发豆豉的做法受到越来越多的关注,但参考文献有限。本研究旨在开发大豆与鹰嘴豆和红腰豆的豆豉组合。研究记录了豆豉样品的物理特性,并按照 AOAC 标准方法测定了其营养成分。此外,还使用享乐主义 9 级测试法进行了感官评估,以研究豆豉的总体接受度。结果表明,大豆和鹰嘴豆豆豉组合的蛋白质含量为(31.08±0.41)%,脂肪含量为(9.88±1.42)%,碳水化合物含量为(16.57±1.90)%,粗纤维含量为(13.49±0.03)%,膳食纤维含量为(4.40±0.02)%,水分含量为(39.91±0.23)%,灰分含量为(2.57±0.21)%。黄豆和红芸豆混合豆豉的蛋白质含量为 30.39±0.12%,脂肪含量为 9.43±1.02%,碳水化合物含量为 13.31±0.78%,粗纤维含量为 11.88±0.03%,膳食纤维含量为 2.50±0.02%,水分含量为 44.17±0.03%,灰分含量为 2.70±0.26%。然而,感官评价显示,大豆和红腰豆豆豉组合因其外观、质地、口感和香气而受到大多数小组成员的青睐,总体接受度得分最高(7.54±0.85)。总之,我们的研究强调了将大豆与鹰嘴豆和红腰豆混合以开发高营养价值豆豉的潜力。这些发现对开发具有理想营养和感官特性的植物肉替代品具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Research
Food Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信