Evaluating the effect of equine tetanus antitoxin on mortality rates of dogs affected by tetanus

Berry Wong
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of equine tetanus antitoxin on mortality rates of dogs affected by tetanus","authors":"Berry Wong","doi":"10.18849/ve.v9i1.676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO Question\nIn dogs with tetanus, does administering the equine tetanus antitoxin compared to not administering the antitoxin reduce mortality rates?\n \nClinical bottom line\nCategory of research\nTreatment.\nNumber and type of study designs reviewed\nThree studies were reviewed for this Knowledge Summary, all of which were retrospective case-control studies.\nStrength of evidence \nWeak.\nOutcomes reported\nThere was no difference in survival to discharge between dogs treated and dogs not treated with equine tetanus antitoxin.\nConclusion\nThe current literature suggests that administering the equine tetanus antitoxin to dogs affected by tetanus had no positive or negative effect on mortality rates, though the level of evidence amongst the literature is weak.\n \nHow to apply this evidence in practice\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.","PeriodicalId":510726,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"22 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v9i1.676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PICO Question In dogs with tetanus, does administering the equine tetanus antitoxin compared to not administering the antitoxin reduce mortality rates?   Clinical bottom line Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Three studies were reviewed for this Knowledge Summary, all of which were retrospective case-control studies. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported There was no difference in survival to discharge between dogs treated and dogs not treated with equine tetanus antitoxin. Conclusion The current literature suggests that administering the equine tetanus antitoxin to dogs affected by tetanus had no positive or negative effect on mortality rates, though the level of evidence amongst the literature is weak.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
评估马破伤风抗毒素对破伤风犬死亡率的影响
PICO问题在患有破伤风的狗中,注射马破伤风抗毒素与不注射抗毒素相比,是否能降低死亡率?临床底线研究类别治疗.综述的研究设计数量和类型本知识摘要综述了三项研究,所有研究均为回顾性病例对照研究.证据强度弱.报告结果使用马破伤风抗毒素治疗和不使用马破伤风抗毒素治疗的犬在出院后的存活率方面没有差异.结论目前的文献表明,对患破伤风的犬使用马破伤风抗毒素对死亡率没有积极或消极的影响,但文献中的证据水平较弱。如何在实践中应用这些证据在实践中应用证据时应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人的临床专业知识、患者的情况和主人的价值观、你工作的国家、地点或诊所、你面前的个案、可用的疗法和资源。知识摘要是一种资源,可帮助加强决策或为决策提供信息,但并不凌驾于从业人员的责任或判断之上,即如何做对其护理的动物才是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信