A Step Towards Automated Haematology: DL Models for Blood Cell Detection and Classification

Q2 Computer Science
Irfan Sadiq Rahat, Mohammed Altaf Ahmed, Donepudi Rohini, A. Manjula, Hritwik Ghosh, Abdus Sobur
{"title":"A Step Towards Automated Haematology: DL Models for Blood Cell Detection and Classification","authors":"Irfan Sadiq Rahat, Mohammed Altaf Ahmed, Donepudi Rohini, A. Manjula, Hritwik Ghosh, Abdus Sobur","doi":"10.4108/eetpht.10.5477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Deep Learning has significantly impacted various domains, including medical imaging and diagnostics, by enabling accurate classification tasks. This research focuses on leveraging deep learning models to automate the classification of different blood cell types, thus advancing hematology practices. \nOBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of five deep learning models - ResNet50, AlexNet, MobileNetV2, VGG16, and VGG19 - in accurately discerning and classifying distinct blood cell categories: Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils. The study aims to identify the most effective model for automating hematology processes. \nMETHODS: A comprehensive dataset containing approximately 8,500 augmented images of the four blood cell types is utilized for training and evaluation. The deep learning models undergo extensive training using this dataset. Performance assessment is conducted using various metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. \nRESULTS: The VGG19 model emerges as the top performer, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99% with near-perfect precision and recall across all cell types. This indicates its robustness and effectiveness in automated blood cell classification tasks. Other models, while demonstrating competence, do not match the performance levels attained by VGG19. \nCONCLUSION: This research underscores the potential of deep learning in automating and enhancing the accuracy of blood cell classification, thereby addressing the labor-intensive and error-prone nature of traditional methods in hematology. The superiority of the VGG19 model highlights its suitability for practical implementation in real-world scenarios. However, further investigation is warranted to comprehend model performance variations and ensure generalization to unseen data. Overall, this study serves as a crucial step towards broader applications of artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics, particularly in the realm of automated hematology, fostering advancements in healthcare technology.","PeriodicalId":36936,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","volume":"90 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.10.5477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Deep Learning has significantly impacted various domains, including medical imaging and diagnostics, by enabling accurate classification tasks. This research focuses on leveraging deep learning models to automate the classification of different blood cell types, thus advancing hematology practices. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of five deep learning models - ResNet50, AlexNet, MobileNetV2, VGG16, and VGG19 - in accurately discerning and classifying distinct blood cell categories: Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils. The study aims to identify the most effective model for automating hematology processes. METHODS: A comprehensive dataset containing approximately 8,500 augmented images of the four blood cell types is utilized for training and evaluation. The deep learning models undergo extensive training using this dataset. Performance assessment is conducted using various metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. RESULTS: The VGG19 model emerges as the top performer, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99% with near-perfect precision and recall across all cell types. This indicates its robustness and effectiveness in automated blood cell classification tasks. Other models, while demonstrating competence, do not match the performance levels attained by VGG19. CONCLUSION: This research underscores the potential of deep learning in automating and enhancing the accuracy of blood cell classification, thereby addressing the labor-intensive and error-prone nature of traditional methods in hematology. The superiority of the VGG19 model highlights its suitability for practical implementation in real-world scenarios. However, further investigation is warranted to comprehend model performance variations and ensure generalization to unseen data. Overall, this study serves as a crucial step towards broader applications of artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics, particularly in the realm of automated hematology, fostering advancements in healthcare technology.
迈向自动化血液学的一步:用于血细胞检测和分类的 DL 模型
简介:深度学习通过实现准确的分类任务,对包括医学成像和诊断在内的各个领域产生了重大影响。本研究的重点是利用深度学习模型自动分类不同的血细胞类型,从而推动血液学实践。目标:本研究的主要目的是评估五种深度学习模型(ResNet50、AlexNet、MobileNetV2、VGG16 和 VGG19)在准确辨别和分类不同血细胞类别方面的性能:嗜酸性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞和中性粒细胞。本研究旨在确定血液学流程自动化的最有效模型。方法:利用包含约 8,500 张四种血细胞类型增强图像的综合数据集进行训练和评估。使用该数据集对深度学习模型进行了广泛的训练。使用各种指标进行性能评估,包括准确率、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数。结果:VGG19 模型表现最佳,准确率高达 99%,所有细胞类型的精确度和召回率都接近完美。这表明该模型在自动血细胞分类任务中的稳健性和有效性。其他模型虽然表现出一定的能力,但无法与 VGG19 达到的性能水平相提并论。结论:这项研究强调了深度学习在自动化和提高血细胞分类准确性方面的潜力,从而解决了血液学传统方法的劳动密集型和易出错的问题。VGG19 模型的优越性凸显了其在现实世界场景中的实用性。然而,要理解模型性能的变化并确保对未见数据的泛化,还需要进一步的研究。总之,这项研究为人工智能在医疗诊断领域的更广泛应用迈出了关键一步,尤其是在自动化血液学领域,促进了医疗保健技术的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信