Evaluation of Various Free Software Options for Catphan 504 Phantom Analysis

Lorena Cunha Fernandes, Maira Ribeiro dos Santos, Leonardo Peres da Silva, Thiago Viana Miranda Lima, R. Simões
{"title":"Evaluation of Various Free Software Options for Catphan 504 Phantom Analysis","authors":"Lorena Cunha Fernandes, Maira Ribeiro dos Santos, Leonardo Peres da Silva, Thiago Viana Miranda Lima, R. Simões","doi":"10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In computed tomography, image quality tests are important to guarantee a correct medical diagnosis and a better cost and benefit for the patient. Purpose: the purpose of this study is to analyse the images reconstructed with different thorax and bone convolution filters using popular free-use software in the field of medical physics, for the Catphan 504 phantom. Methods: a total of 14 scans were performed using the chest protocol, with convolution filters (FC) FC30, FC35, FC50, FC51, FC52, FC53, FC55, FC56, FC80, FC81, FC83, FC84, FC85, FC86, on the 16-channel Canon Aquilion Lightning CT scanner using the Catphan 504 phantom. Image quality parameters evaluated were: noise, uniformity, linearity of CT numbers, and high spatial resolution with MTF 50% and MTF 10%. The images were evaluated using software such as ImageJ, Script Python, and free software for automatic evaluation of the Catphan 504 phantom, CTQA-cp, SPICE-CT, and Pylinac. Results: the tests carried out with the Catphan 504 phantom were analysed by the software and agreed with each other (with p>0.05), except for Pylinac. The results obtained with Pylinac had a significant difference for the uniformity, slice thickness, and MTF10% tests, this being the code that was the furthest away from the results obtained by the other codes. Conclusions: the ImageJ, Spice-CT, and CTQA-cp software showed consistent results for the tests performed, while Pylinac had limitations in calculating the standard deviation for the noise test and showed significant differences in some tests when compared to the other software.","PeriodicalId":505520,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","volume":"94 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In computed tomography, image quality tests are important to guarantee a correct medical diagnosis and a better cost and benefit for the patient. Purpose: the purpose of this study is to analyse the images reconstructed with different thorax and bone convolution filters using popular free-use software in the field of medical physics, for the Catphan 504 phantom. Methods: a total of 14 scans were performed using the chest protocol, with convolution filters (FC) FC30, FC35, FC50, FC51, FC52, FC53, FC55, FC56, FC80, FC81, FC83, FC84, FC85, FC86, on the 16-channel Canon Aquilion Lightning CT scanner using the Catphan 504 phantom. Image quality parameters evaluated were: noise, uniformity, linearity of CT numbers, and high spatial resolution with MTF 50% and MTF 10%. The images were evaluated using software such as ImageJ, Script Python, and free software for automatic evaluation of the Catphan 504 phantom, CTQA-cp, SPICE-CT, and Pylinac. Results: the tests carried out with the Catphan 504 phantom were analysed by the software and agreed with each other (with p>0.05), except for Pylinac. The results obtained with Pylinac had a significant difference for the uniformity, slice thickness, and MTF10% tests, this being the code that was the furthest away from the results obtained by the other codes. Conclusions: the ImageJ, Spice-CT, and CTQA-cp software showed consistent results for the tests performed, while Pylinac had limitations in calculating the standard deviation for the noise test and showed significant differences in some tests when compared to the other software.
评估用于 504 个猫眼幻影分析的各种免费软件选项
在计算机断层扫描中,图像质量检测对于保证正确的医疗诊断和患者获得更好的成本和收益非常重要。目的:本研究的目的是使用医学物理学领域流行的免费软件,分析在 Catphan 504 模型中使用不同胸部和骨骼卷积滤波器重建的图像。方法:在 16 通道佳能 Aquilion Lightning CT 扫描仪上使用 Catphan 504 模型,使用胸部协议、卷积滤波器 (FC) FC30、FC35、FC50、FC51、FC52、FC53、FC55、FC56、FC80、FC81、FC83、FC84、FC85、FC86 共进行了 14 次扫描。评估的图像质量参数包括:噪声、均匀性、CT 数字线性度以及 MTF 50% 和 MTF 10% 的高空间分辨率。使用 ImageJ、Script Python 等软件和 Catphan 504 模型自动评估免费软件、CTQA-cp、SPICE-CT 和 Pylinac 对图像进行了评估。结果:软件分析了使用 Catphan 504 模型进行的测试,除 Pylinac 外,其他测试结果一致(P>0.05)。Pylinac 在均匀性、切片厚度和 MTF10% 测试中获得的结果差异显著,是与其他代码获得的结果相差最远的代码。结论:ImageJ、Spice-CT 和 CTQA-cp 软件在测试中显示出一致的结果,而 Pylinac 在计算噪声测试的标准偏差方面存在局限性,并且在某些测试中与其他软件相比存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信