Commitment to and connection with green brands: perspectives of consumer social responsibility and terror management theory

A. Rahimah, Ben-Roy Do, A. Le, Julian Ming-Sung Cheng
{"title":"Commitment to and connection with green brands: perspectives of consumer social responsibility and terror management theory","authors":"A. Rahimah, Ben-Roy Do, A. Le, Julian Ming-Sung Cheng","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-11-2022-4214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate specific green-brand affect in terms of commitment and connection through the morality–mortality determinants of consumer social responsibility and the assumptions of terror management theory in the proposed three-layered framework. Religiosity serves as a moderator within the framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData are collected in Taipei, Taiwan, while quota sampling is applied, and 420 valid questionnaires are collected. The partial least squares technique is applied for data analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nWith the contingent role of religiosity, consumer social responsibility influences socially conscious consumption, which in turn drives the commitment and connection of green-brand affect. The death anxiety and self-esteem outlined in terror management theory influence materialism, which then drives green-brand commitment; however, contrary to expectations, they do not drive green-brand connection.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy considering green brands beyond their cognitive aspects and into their affective counterparts, morality–mortality drivers of green-brand commitment and green-grand connection are explored to provide unique contributions so as to better understand socially responsible consumption.\n","PeriodicalId":114857,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-11-2022-4214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate specific green-brand affect in terms of commitment and connection through the morality–mortality determinants of consumer social responsibility and the assumptions of terror management theory in the proposed three-layered framework. Religiosity serves as a moderator within the framework. Design/methodology/approach Data are collected in Taipei, Taiwan, while quota sampling is applied, and 420 valid questionnaires are collected. The partial least squares technique is applied for data analysis. Findings With the contingent role of religiosity, consumer social responsibility influences socially conscious consumption, which in turn drives the commitment and connection of green-brand affect. The death anxiety and self-esteem outlined in terror management theory influence materialism, which then drives green-brand commitment; however, contrary to expectations, they do not drive green-brand connection. Originality/value By considering green brands beyond their cognitive aspects and into their affective counterparts, morality–mortality drivers of green-brand commitment and green-grand connection are explored to provide unique contributions so as to better understand socially responsible consumption.
对绿色品牌的承诺和联系:消费者社会责任和恐怖管理理论的视角
目的 本研究旨在通过消费者社会责任的道德-死亡决定因素以及所提出的三层框架中的恐怖管理理论假设,调查绿色品牌在承诺和联系方面的具体影响。数据在台湾台北市收集,采用配额抽样法,共收集到 420 份有效问卷。研究结果在宗教信仰的偶然作用下,消费者的社会责任感会影响社会意识消费,进而推动绿色品牌情感的承诺和联系。原创性/价值通过对绿色品牌认知之外的情感方面的考量,探讨了绿色品牌承诺和绿色品牌联系的道德-死亡驱动因素,为更好地理解社会责任消费做出了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信