Teachers’ Perceptions, Knowledge, and Interactions with Scripted Curriculum

L. Nadelson, Allison Freed, Odunola Oyeniyi, et. al.
{"title":"Teachers’ Perceptions, Knowledge, and Interactions with Scripted Curriculum","authors":"L. Nadelson, Allison Freed, Odunola Oyeniyi, et. al.","doi":"10.32861/rje.101.13.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As shortages of teachers increase and student standardized test scores remain low and unchanged, there is a push for increasing instructional effectiveness using scripted curriculum and direct instruction. However, scripted curriculum is likely inconsistent with teachers’ professional visions and needs, leading to conflicting goals for adopting scripted curriculum and teachers’ professional goals. We determined the gaps in the literature support the need to collectively explore how teachers define and consider scripted curriculum, particularly the extent to which they think the curriculum is culturally responsive, motivates students to learn, are involved in adopting the curriculum, and their preferences for teaching with scripted curriculum. Using a cross-section survey design, we gathered quantitative and qualitative data from 292 K-12 teachers working in the south-central United States. We found teachers did not perceive scripted curriculum as culturally responsive, did not think the curriculum motivates students to learn, did not like teaching with the curriculum or preferred to use it as a resource, and tended to be marginally involved in selecting the curriculum. Our research empirically documents the narrative teachers tend to share about scripted curriculum. We conclude our report by discussing our results, implications for our findings, and recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":280699,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Education","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32861/rje.101.13.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As shortages of teachers increase and student standardized test scores remain low and unchanged, there is a push for increasing instructional effectiveness using scripted curriculum and direct instruction. However, scripted curriculum is likely inconsistent with teachers’ professional visions and needs, leading to conflicting goals for adopting scripted curriculum and teachers’ professional goals. We determined the gaps in the literature support the need to collectively explore how teachers define and consider scripted curriculum, particularly the extent to which they think the curriculum is culturally responsive, motivates students to learn, are involved in adopting the curriculum, and their preferences for teaching with scripted curriculum. Using a cross-section survey design, we gathered quantitative and qualitative data from 292 K-12 teachers working in the south-central United States. We found teachers did not perceive scripted curriculum as culturally responsive, did not think the curriculum motivates students to learn, did not like teaching with the curriculum or preferred to use it as a resource, and tended to be marginally involved in selecting the curriculum. Our research empirically documents the narrative teachers tend to share about scripted curriculum. We conclude our report by discussing our results, implications for our findings, and recommendations for future research.
教师对脚本课程的看法、了解和互动
随着师资短缺的加剧,学生标准化考试成绩持续走低且没有变化,人们开始推动使用脚本课程和直接教学来提高教学效果。然而,脚本课程很可能与教师的专业愿景和需求不一致,导致采用脚本课程的目标与教师的专业目标相冲突。我们认为,文献中的空白表明,有必要共同探讨教师如何定义和考虑脚本课程,尤其是他们认为脚本课程在多大程度上能促进文化交流、激发学生的学习动机、参与采用脚本课程的程度,以及他们对采用脚本课程教学的偏好。我们采用横截面调查设计,收集了美国中南部 292 名 K-12 教师的定量和定性数据。我们发现,教师不认为脚本课程具有文化响应性,不认为课程能激发学生的学习动机,不喜欢用课程教学或更喜欢将课程作为一种资源,而且在选择课程时往往很少参与。我们的研究以实证的方式记录了教师对脚本课程的看法。在报告的最后,我们讨论了研究结果、研究结果的意义以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信