Perioperative regional anaesthesia in kidney transplantation

V. Sharipova, F. K. Siyabaev, A. K. Alimov, M. M. Sadikov
{"title":"Perioperative regional anaesthesia in kidney transplantation","authors":"V. Sharipova, F. K. Siyabaev, A. K. Alimov, M. M. Sadikov","doi":"10.23873/2074-0506-2024-16-1-34-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Postoperative analgesia in kidney transplant recipients is challenging due to potential nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the reduced clearance of opioid metabolites during transient renal impairment. Opioid-sparing multimodal postoperative analgesia using regional analgesia methods could provide better pain control and early activation after kidney transplantation.Aim. To evaluate the clinical results of treatment using regional pain management methods in kidney transplant recipients.Material and methods. A single-center study was conducted at Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine from 2020 to 2022. The study included 97 patients who underwent heterotopic kidney transplantation from a living related donor. Patients were divided into 3 groups. In group 1 (31 patients), general anesthesia was used. For postoperative analgesia opioid analgesics in combination with metamizole 1000 mg were used. In group 2 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and open transversus abdominis plane block was used. In group 3 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and erector spine plane block was performed. Opioid analgesics were used as a \"rescue analgesia\" when necessary. The primary study end points were the pain intensity assessed by a visual analogue scale and opioid consumption on the first day after surgery. Secondary endpoints were the time of intestinal motility recovery, the presence of nausea and vomiting, the Intensive Care Unit length of stay and the hospital length of stay.Results. Pain intensity 6 hours after surgery in patients of group 1 was 13.5% and 24.6% higher than in patients of group 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, pain intensity was 12.8% higher compared to group 3 (p=0.0017). At 12 hours after surgery, the pain intensity was 42% higher in group 1 compared to group 2 and group 3 (p<0.0001). After 18 hours, the pain score in group 3 was 48.5% and 35.7% lower compared to groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.0016). 24 hours after surgery, the sensation of pain was 18.6% and 65.3% higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (p<0.0001). The mean dose of narcotic analgesic equivalent to morphine in group 1 was 22.6±8.6 mg, which was 18.5% higher than in group 2 patients. In group 3, it was 12.0±4.3 mg and was 47% lower compared to group 1 (p<0.0001) and 34.7% lower compared to group 2 (p<0.0001) (all comparisons are statistically significant). The adequacy of analgesia and less opioid consumption contributed to the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 75% of cases, early restoration of intestinal motility in 63% compared with the group of patients where opioid analgesics were used for postoperative pain relief.Conclusion. The combined use of general anesthesia and erector spine plane block may be recommended as a method of effective perioperative analgesia in kidney transplantation.","PeriodicalId":508006,"journal":{"name":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","volume":"124 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2024-16-1-34-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Postoperative analgesia in kidney transplant recipients is challenging due to potential nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the reduced clearance of opioid metabolites during transient renal impairment. Opioid-sparing multimodal postoperative analgesia using regional analgesia methods could provide better pain control and early activation after kidney transplantation.Aim. To evaluate the clinical results of treatment using regional pain management methods in kidney transplant recipients.Material and methods. A single-center study was conducted at Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine from 2020 to 2022. The study included 97 patients who underwent heterotopic kidney transplantation from a living related donor. Patients were divided into 3 groups. In group 1 (31 patients), general anesthesia was used. For postoperative analgesia opioid analgesics in combination with metamizole 1000 mg were used. In group 2 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and open transversus abdominis plane block was used. In group 3 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and erector spine plane block was performed. Opioid analgesics were used as a "rescue analgesia" when necessary. The primary study end points were the pain intensity assessed by a visual analogue scale and opioid consumption on the first day after surgery. Secondary endpoints were the time of intestinal motility recovery, the presence of nausea and vomiting, the Intensive Care Unit length of stay and the hospital length of stay.Results. Pain intensity 6 hours after surgery in patients of group 1 was 13.5% and 24.6% higher than in patients of group 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, pain intensity was 12.8% higher compared to group 3 (p=0.0017). At 12 hours after surgery, the pain intensity was 42% higher in group 1 compared to group 2 and group 3 (p<0.0001). After 18 hours, the pain score in group 3 was 48.5% and 35.7% lower compared to groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.0016). 24 hours after surgery, the sensation of pain was 18.6% and 65.3% higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (p<0.0001). The mean dose of narcotic analgesic equivalent to morphine in group 1 was 22.6±8.6 mg, which was 18.5% higher than in group 2 patients. In group 3, it was 12.0±4.3 mg and was 47% lower compared to group 1 (p<0.0001) and 34.7% lower compared to group 2 (p<0.0001) (all comparisons are statistically significant). The adequacy of analgesia and less opioid consumption contributed to the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in 75% of cases, early restoration of intestinal motility in 63% compared with the group of patients where opioid analgesics were used for postoperative pain relief.Conclusion. The combined use of general anesthesia and erector spine plane block may be recommended as a method of effective perioperative analgesia in kidney transplantation.
肾移植围手术期区域麻醉
背景。由于非甾体类抗炎药物的潜在肾毒性和一过性肾功能损害时阿片类代谢物的清除率降低,肾移植受者的术后镇痛具有挑战性。使用区域镇痛方法进行阿片类药物节约型多模式术后镇痛可在肾移植术后提供更好的疼痛控制和早期激活。评估肾移植受者使用区域镇痛方法治疗的临床效果。2020 年至 2022 年,共和国急诊医学研究中心开展了一项单中心研究。研究对象包括97名接受活体亲属异位肾移植的患者。患者被分为 3 组。第一组(31 名患者)采用全身麻醉。术后镇痛使用阿片类镇痛药联合甲硝唑 1000 毫克。第 2 组(33 名受术者)采用全身麻醉和开放性腹横肌平面阻滞相结合的方法。第 3 组(33 名受术者)采用全身麻醉和竖脊平面阻滞相结合的方法。必要时使用阿片类镇痛药作为 "抢救性镇痛"。研究的主要终点是术后第一天用视觉模拟量表评估的疼痛强度和阿片类药物的消耗量。次要终点是肠蠕动恢复时间、恶心和呕吐情况、重症监护室住院时间和住院时间。第一组患者术后6小时的疼痛强度分别比第二组和第三组患者高13.5%和24.6%。第 2 组的疼痛强度比第 3 组高 12.8%(P=0.0017)。术后 12 小时,第 1 组的疼痛强度比第 2 组和第 3 组高 42%(P<0.0001)。18 小时后,第 3 组的疼痛评分分别比第 1 组和第 2 组低 48.5%和 35.7%(p<0.0001 和 p=0.0016)。术后 24 小时后,第 1 组的疼痛感觉比第 2 组和第 3 组分别高出 18.6% 和 65.3%(p<0.0001)。第 1 组患者的麻醉镇痛剂(相当于吗啡)平均剂量为 22.6±8.6 毫克,比第 2 组患者高出 18.5%。第 3 组为 12.0±4.3 毫克,比第 1 组低 47%(P<0.0001),比第 2 组低 34.7%(P<0.0001)(所有比较均有统计学意义)。与使用阿片类镇痛药进行术后镇痛的患者组相比,镇痛的充分性和阿片类药物用量的减少使75%的患者术后没有恶心和呕吐,63%的患者术后肠蠕动得到了早期恢复。结论:推荐在肾移植手术中联合使用全身麻醉和竖脊平面阻滞,作为有效的围手术期镇痛方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信