Defining the "Cyber-Pearl Harbor" - Validation of the DSLP-framework in "Offensive Cyberspace Operations Targeting Ukraine: A Cyber Pearl-Harbor"

Jonathan Lilja, Eleshwa Eishayea, Gazmend Huskaj
{"title":"Defining the \"Cyber-Pearl Harbor\" - Validation of the DSLP-framework in \"Offensive Cyberspace Operations Targeting Ukraine: A Cyber Pearl-Harbor\"","authors":"Jonathan Lilja, Eleshwa Eishayea, Gazmend Huskaj","doi":"10.34190/iccws.19.1.2035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of cyberattacks against organizations, health care and individuals have increased along with the constant digitalisation. Nations have also fallen victim to cyberattacks, often combined with other means of war. A Cyber-Pearl Harbor (further shortened as CPH) is a term mentioned by the former United States Secretary of Defense, Mr. Leon Panetta, who described it as “combined attacks that result in human death and physical destruction and that paralyzes an entire nation”. Gazmend Huskaj used Panetta's definition in order to create a framework (herein the “DSLP-framework”) for classifying an event as a CPH. This study strives to see if the DSLP-framework can be validated since the term has been widely used for the last 25 years. However, a universal definition of the term seems to be missing, therefore it is not certain that the criteria presented in the framework is accurate. A qualitative case study was conducted through a literature review regarding the term CPH and semi structured interviews with three experts were done, which were later analysed through a thematic analysis. The framework was applied to three real life cases: a public health sector in Costa Rica, a TV-tower in Kyiv, Ukraine and the grocery company Coop in Sweden. The result from applying the DSLP-framework to each case was that only the case of TV-tower in Kiev, Ukraine, could be classified as a CPH. The following conclusions were drawn in this study: 1) The framework could not be validated due to lack of data, and 2) The interviewees views differed from the framework making it hard to find common ground.","PeriodicalId":429427,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","volume":"91 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/iccws.19.1.2035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of cyberattacks against organizations, health care and individuals have increased along with the constant digitalisation. Nations have also fallen victim to cyberattacks, often combined with other means of war. A Cyber-Pearl Harbor (further shortened as CPH) is a term mentioned by the former United States Secretary of Defense, Mr. Leon Panetta, who described it as “combined attacks that result in human death and physical destruction and that paralyzes an entire nation”. Gazmend Huskaj used Panetta's definition in order to create a framework (herein the “DSLP-framework”) for classifying an event as a CPH. This study strives to see if the DSLP-framework can be validated since the term has been widely used for the last 25 years. However, a universal definition of the term seems to be missing, therefore it is not certain that the criteria presented in the framework is accurate. A qualitative case study was conducted through a literature review regarding the term CPH and semi structured interviews with three experts were done, which were later analysed through a thematic analysis. The framework was applied to three real life cases: a public health sector in Costa Rica, a TV-tower in Kyiv, Ukraine and the grocery company Coop in Sweden. The result from applying the DSLP-framework to each case was that only the case of TV-tower in Kiev, Ukraine, could be classified as a CPH. The following conclusions were drawn in this study: 1) The framework could not be validated due to lack of data, and 2) The interviewees views differed from the framework making it hard to find common ground.
定义 "网络珍珠港"--在 "针对乌克兰的进攻性网络空间行动 "中验证 DSLP 框架:网络珍珠港
随着数字化的不断发展,针对组织、医疗保健和个人的网络攻击也在增加。国家也成为网络攻击的受害者,而且往往与其他战争手段相结合。美国前国防部长莱昂-帕内塔(Leon Panetta)曾提到过 "网络珍珠港"(Cyber-Pearl Harbor,简称 CPH)一词,他将其描述为 "造成人员伤亡和物质破坏并导致整个国家瘫痪的联合攻击"。Gazmend Huskaj 利用帕内塔的定义创建了一个将事件归类为 CPH 的框架(即 "DSLP 框架")。本研究旨在了解 DSLP 框架是否能够得到验证,因为该术语在过去 25 年中已被广泛使用。然而,该术语似乎缺少一个通用的定义,因此无法确定该框架中提出的标准是否准确。通过对 CPH 一词的文献综述和对三位专家的半结构式访谈,我们进行了一项定性案例研究,随后通过专题分析对其进行了分析。该框架适用于三个真实案例:哥斯达黎加的公共卫生部门、乌克兰基辅的电视塔和瑞典的杂货公司 Coop。对每个案例应用 DSLP 框架得出的结果是,只有乌克兰基辅的电视塔可以归类为 CPH。本研究得出以下结论:1) 由于缺乏数据,该框架无法得到验证;2) 受访者的观点与框架不同,因此很难找到共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信