What Cluster Headache Patients Would Like Their Relatives to Know: Results from a Qualitative Study

Papitha Saravanamuthu, Susanne Wegener, Heiko Pohl
{"title":"What Cluster Headache Patients Would Like Their Relatives to Know: Results from a Qualitative Study","authors":"Papitha Saravanamuthu, Susanne Wegener, Heiko Pohl","doi":"10.3390/ctn8010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many patients with cluster headaches report that their relatives do not understand what they are going through. This qualitative study aimed to collect patients’ recommendations and wishes on how others should respond to those suffering from cluster headaches. We recruited 22 patients with episodic or chronic cluster headaches for this cross-sectional study. They responded to seven questions that assessed the disease’s impact on their relationships with relatives and their wishes for others’ behaviour towards them. Seven recommendations for relatives emerged: (i) withdraw during attacks, (ii) respect post-ictal exhaustion, (iii) do not insist on discussing the disorder, (iv) help the patient to lead a “normal” life, (v) support preserving social contacts, (vi) show being aware of the disease severity, and (vii) expect the disease to take up space in patients’ lives and minds. Two recommendations for the interictal period indicate avoidance, which is considered a negative coping strategy. Conversely, the suggestion to support preserving social contacts might mean confronting the disease, which is likely associated with more favourable outcomes. Still, adhering to all patients’ requests might increase suffering instead of reducing it. Thus, further research is needed to develop strategies suited to improve well-being.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"58 s207","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn8010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many patients with cluster headaches report that their relatives do not understand what they are going through. This qualitative study aimed to collect patients’ recommendations and wishes on how others should respond to those suffering from cluster headaches. We recruited 22 patients with episodic or chronic cluster headaches for this cross-sectional study. They responded to seven questions that assessed the disease’s impact on their relationships with relatives and their wishes for others’ behaviour towards them. Seven recommendations for relatives emerged: (i) withdraw during attacks, (ii) respect post-ictal exhaustion, (iii) do not insist on discussing the disorder, (iv) help the patient to lead a “normal” life, (v) support preserving social contacts, (vi) show being aware of the disease severity, and (vii) expect the disease to take up space in patients’ lives and minds. Two recommendations for the interictal period indicate avoidance, which is considered a negative coping strategy. Conversely, the suggestion to support preserving social contacts might mean confronting the disease, which is likely associated with more favourable outcomes. Still, adhering to all patients’ requests might increase suffering instead of reducing it. Thus, further research is needed to develop strategies suited to improve well-being.
丛集性头痛患者希望亲属了解什么?定性研究的结果
许多丛集性头痛患者表示,他们的亲属并不理解他们的遭遇。这项定性研究旨在收集患者的建议和愿望,了解他人应如何应对丛集性头痛患者。我们招募了 22 名发作性或慢性丛集性头痛患者参与这项横断面研究。他们回答了七个问题,这些问题评估了疾病对他们与亲属关系的影响,以及他们对他人对其行为的愿望。他们对亲属提出了七项建议:(i) 在发作时退缩;(ii) 尊重发作后的疲惫;(iii) 不要坚持讨论疾病;(iv) 帮助患者过上 "正常 "生活;(v) 支持患者保持社会交往;(vi) 表示意识到疾病的严重性;(vii) 期望疾病占据患者的生活和思想空间。针对发作间歇期的两项建议指出要回避,这被认为是一种消极的应对策略。相反,支持保持社会交往的建议可能意味着直面疾病,这可能与更有利的结果相关。不过,坚持满足所有患者的要求可能会增加患者的痛苦,而不是减少痛苦。因此,需要进一步开展研究,以制定适合改善福祉的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信