Mapping out focus for circular economy business models (CEBMs) research in construction sector studies – a bibliometric approach

O. Otasowie, C. Aigbavboa, Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke, Peter Adekunle
{"title":"Mapping out focus for circular economy business models (CEBMs) research in construction sector studies – a bibliometric approach","authors":"O. Otasowie, C. Aigbavboa, Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke, Peter Adekunle","doi":"10.1108/jedt-10-2023-0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe circular economy business models (CEBMs) provide ways for firms operating in the construction industry to move from a linear to a circular approach. Thus, this study aims to explore CEBM research within the construction sector to show the focus area of studies, highlighting new areas that require attention.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopted a bibliometric approach, using the Scopus database as the data source. The keywords used for paper extraction from the database were “circular economy business” OR “circular business” AND “model” OR “models” AND “construction industry” OR “building industry”. The VOSviewer software was then used to prepare a co-occurrence and co-authorship map based on the bibliographic data gathered.\n\nFindings\nThe study’s findings reveal five research clusters in the construction industry. These clusters include circular construction intelligence, modular business modelling, eco-construction, sustainable construction economics and smart energy-efficient buildings. The two most cited scholars had two publications each, while the top journals are the Journal of Cleaner Production and Sustainable Production and Consumption. This study concludes that there is a need for research within the construction sector to focus on CEBMs’ archetypes and frameworks. This will enable a smooth transition from linear to circular business models in the sector.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe information was gathered from a single database, Scopus; hence, using other databases, including Web of Science, Google Scholar and Dimensions, might produce more articles for examination and, consequently, different findings on the subject under investigation.\n\nPractical implications\nThese findings would assist researchers in considering the areas mentioned, which are yet to receive attention, and, by extension, enhance economic development while maintaining environmental sustainability.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper made a significant contribution to the body of knowledge by identifying scholars and platforms that have been instrumental in advancing CEBM research and highlighting new areas that require attention in the construction sector.\n","PeriodicalId":514531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","volume":"76 s323","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-10-2023-0444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The circular economy business models (CEBMs) provide ways for firms operating in the construction industry to move from a linear to a circular approach. Thus, this study aims to explore CEBM research within the construction sector to show the focus area of studies, highlighting new areas that require attention. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a bibliometric approach, using the Scopus database as the data source. The keywords used for paper extraction from the database were “circular economy business” OR “circular business” AND “model” OR “models” AND “construction industry” OR “building industry”. The VOSviewer software was then used to prepare a co-occurrence and co-authorship map based on the bibliographic data gathered. Findings The study’s findings reveal five research clusters in the construction industry. These clusters include circular construction intelligence, modular business modelling, eco-construction, sustainable construction economics and smart energy-efficient buildings. The two most cited scholars had two publications each, while the top journals are the Journal of Cleaner Production and Sustainable Production and Consumption. This study concludes that there is a need for research within the construction sector to focus on CEBMs’ archetypes and frameworks. This will enable a smooth transition from linear to circular business models in the sector. Research limitations/implications The information was gathered from a single database, Scopus; hence, using other databases, including Web of Science, Google Scholar and Dimensions, might produce more articles for examination and, consequently, different findings on the subject under investigation. Practical implications These findings would assist researchers in considering the areas mentioned, which are yet to receive attention, and, by extension, enhance economic development while maintaining environmental sustainability. Originality/value This paper made a significant contribution to the body of knowledge by identifying scholars and platforms that have been instrumental in advancing CEBM research and highlighting new areas that require attention in the construction sector.
确定建筑行业研究中的循环经济商业模式(CEBMs)研究重点--一种文献计量法
目的循环经济商业模式(CEBMs)为建筑行业的企业提供了从线性方法转向循环方法的途径。因此,本研究旨在探索建筑行业内的循环经济商业模式研究,以显示研究的重点领域,突出需要关注的新领域。设计/方法/途径本研究采用文献计量法,使用 Scopus 数据库作为数据源。从数据库中提取论文的关键词为 "循环经济企业 "或 "循环企业"、"模型 "或 "模型"、"建筑行业 "或 "建筑行业"。然后,根据收集到的文献数据,使用 VOSviewer 软件绘制了共现和合著地图。这些研究集群包括循环建筑智能化、模块化商业建模、生态建筑、可持续建筑经济学和智能节能建筑。被引用次数最多的两位学者各发表了两篇论文,排名靠前的期刊分别是《清洁生产期刊》和《可持续生产与消费》。本研究得出结论,建筑行业内的研究需要关注 CEBM 的原型和框架。研究的局限性/意义本研究从单一数据库 Scopus 收集信息;因此,使用其他数据库(包括 Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 Dimensions)可能会产生更多文章供研究,从而对所研究的主题得出不同的结论。实际意义这些研究结果将有助于研究人员考虑尚未受到关注的上述领域,进而在保持环境可持续性的同时促进经济发展。 原创性/价值本文通过确定有助于推进建筑工程管理研究的学者和平台,并强调建筑领域需要关注的新领域,对知识体系做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信