Exploring South Africa’s Cybersecurity Legal Framework regulating Information Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability

M. Watney
{"title":"Exploring South Africa’s Cybersecurity Legal Framework regulating Information Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability","authors":"M. Watney","doi":"10.34190/iccws.19.1.1999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion critically evaluates the effectiveness of laws dealing with cyber threats within the context of the South African cybersecurity landscape. It deals with the legal response to non-state cyber operations to national security and law enforcement by means of the domestic law and not with state or state-sponsored cyber operations which falls within the remit of the international law. Globally the digital ecosystems of all countries face a common denominator, namely the threat of cyber operations and how to deal with it effectively. There are various cyber operations, but the discussion mainly deals with cyber operations that target the confidentiality, availability and integrity of information and the effectiveness of the South African cybersecurity legislation in protecting information. The effectiveness of the following legislation will be deliberated: • The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) 4 of 2013. POPIA does not define a data breach, nor does it indicate the time in which the breach must be reported to the Information Regulator (IR). In 2021 the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (Department) suffered a ransomware attack. The breach was reported to the IR. In July 2023 the Department became the first institution to be fined for failure to comply with an enforcement notice. • The Cybercrimes Act 119 of 2021. The ransomware attack suffered by the Department in 2021 constitutes a cybercrime, but how effective is the Cybercrimes Act to facilitate the investigation and prosecution of the threat actor(s) who orchestrated the attack? Should there not be guidelines in respect of a ransomware attack prescribing a compulsory reporting obligation or discouraging payment of ransom. The first line of defense to offensive non-state cyber operations is a robust and resilient cybersecurity legal framework. Although a government cannot eliminate all possible threats, it can mitigate the risks, and this can be achieved by means of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. A country should have a cybersecurity strategy and it will be determined if for example the 2023 United States of America cybersecurity strategy could serve as guidance to South Africa. Why is your paper of interest to the conference participants? Use this space to persuade the reviewers why they should select this abstract for the conference : In today’s digital world, one cannot ignore the importance of cybersecurity. One single security breach may result in the exposure of the personal information of millions of people. Cybersecurity legislation is therefore essential to ensure the protection of government departments, institutions, businesses and individuals against malicious cyber operations.","PeriodicalId":429427,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/iccws.19.1.1999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discussion critically evaluates the effectiveness of laws dealing with cyber threats within the context of the South African cybersecurity landscape. It deals with the legal response to non-state cyber operations to national security and law enforcement by means of the domestic law and not with state or state-sponsored cyber operations which falls within the remit of the international law. Globally the digital ecosystems of all countries face a common denominator, namely the threat of cyber operations and how to deal with it effectively. There are various cyber operations, but the discussion mainly deals with cyber operations that target the confidentiality, availability and integrity of information and the effectiveness of the South African cybersecurity legislation in protecting information. The effectiveness of the following legislation will be deliberated: • The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) 4 of 2013. POPIA does not define a data breach, nor does it indicate the time in which the breach must be reported to the Information Regulator (IR). In 2021 the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (Department) suffered a ransomware attack. The breach was reported to the IR. In July 2023 the Department became the first institution to be fined for failure to comply with an enforcement notice. • The Cybercrimes Act 119 of 2021. The ransomware attack suffered by the Department in 2021 constitutes a cybercrime, but how effective is the Cybercrimes Act to facilitate the investigation and prosecution of the threat actor(s) who orchestrated the attack? Should there not be guidelines in respect of a ransomware attack prescribing a compulsory reporting obligation or discouraging payment of ransom. The first line of defense to offensive non-state cyber operations is a robust and resilient cybersecurity legal framework. Although a government cannot eliminate all possible threats, it can mitigate the risks, and this can be achieved by means of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. A country should have a cybersecurity strategy and it will be determined if for example the 2023 United States of America cybersecurity strategy could serve as guidance to South Africa. Why is your paper of interest to the conference participants? Use this space to persuade the reviewers why they should select this abstract for the conference : In today’s digital world, one cannot ignore the importance of cybersecurity. One single security breach may result in the exposure of the personal information of millions of people. Cybersecurity legislation is therefore essential to ensure the protection of government departments, institutions, businesses and individuals against malicious cyber operations.
探索南非规范信息保密性、完整性和可用性的网络安全法律框架
讨论以批判的方式评估了南非网络安全背景下应对网络威胁的法律的有效性。它涉及通过国内法应对非国家网络行动对国家安全和执法的影响,而不涉及国家或国家支持的网络行动,后者属于国际法的范畴。在全球范围内,所有国家的数字生态系统都面临着一个共同点,即网络行动的威胁以及如何有效应对这一威胁。网络行动多种多样,但讨论主要涉及针对信息的保密性、可用性和完整性的网络行动,以及南非网络安全立法在保护信息方面的有效性。将讨论以下立法的有效性:- 2013 年第 4 号《个人信息保护法》(POPIA)。个人信息保护法》没有对数据泄露进行定义,也没有说明必须向信息监管机构(IR)报告数据泄露的时间。2021 年,司法和宪法发展部(Department of Justice and Constitutional Development,Department)遭受勒索软件攻击。该部向信息监管机构报告了信息泄露事件。2023 年 7 月,该部成为首个因未遵守执行通知而被罚款的机构。- 网络犯罪法》(Cybercrimes Act 119 of 2021)。2021 年该部遭受的勒索软件攻击构成了网络犯罪,但《网络犯罪法》在促进调查和起诉策划攻击的威胁行为者方面的效力如何?对于勒索软件攻击,是否应制定指导方针,规定强制报告义务或阻止支付赎金。针对进攻性非国家网络行动的第一道防线是健全而有弹性的网络安全法律框架。虽然政府无法消除所有可能的威胁,但可以降低风险,而这可以通过全面的网络安全战略来实现。一个国家应该有自己的网络安全战略,我们将确定 2023 年美国网络安全战略是否可以为南非提供指导。为什么与会者对您的论文感兴趣?请利用此空格说服评审人员为何应选择此摘要参会:在当今的数字世界中,网络安全的重要性不容忽视。一个单一的安全漏洞就可能导致数百万人的个人信息泄露。因此,网络安全立法对于确保政府部门、机构、企业和个人免受恶意网络操作的侵害至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信