Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Deebah Choudhary, Ana Gupta, Nidhi Bharti
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin","authors":"Deebah Choudhary, Ana Gupta, Nidhi Bharti","doi":"10.1177/23202068241237329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the penetration depth and persistence of sealer residues in obturated canals with three different bioceramic sealers using confocal microscopy. In total, 60 single-rooted human premolars were selected and decoronated to maintain the working length of 14 mm. The samples were biomechanically prepared and obturated with Protaper Universal GP coated with three different bioceramic sealers, that is, CeraSeal RC, Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. The specimens were divided into three groups ( n = 20) depending on the sealer used. Rhodamine B fluorescent dye was added to the sealers before using them for obturation. The obturated samples were sealed and placed in 100% humidity at 37oC for 7 days. Gutta-percha was removed from all the samples using retreatment files. Each sample was horizontally sectioned into 2 mm thick slices at 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex, which were analysed under a confocal scanning microscope to detect the depth of penetration of sealer into the dentinal tubules. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests. Intergroup comparison of penetration depth at 3 mm showed that the mean depth of penetration among CeraSeal samples was found to be significantly more as compared to the other two materials, while, no statistically significant difference was found among Bio-C and MTA Fillapex with the significance level established at 5% ( P < .05). Similarly, an intergroup comparison of penetration depth at 5 mm showed that the mean depth of penetration among CeraSeal samples was found to be significantly more as compared to the other two materials, while, no statistically significant difference was found among Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. CeraSeal RC sealer showed significantly higher depth of penetration than Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. All bioceramic sealers show a significant penetration into the dentinal tubules. However, none of the sealers was completely removed from the tubules following retreatment.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068241237329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the penetration depth and persistence of sealer residues in obturated canals with three different bioceramic sealers using confocal microscopy. In total, 60 single-rooted human premolars were selected and decoronated to maintain the working length of 14 mm. The samples were biomechanically prepared and obturated with Protaper Universal GP coated with three different bioceramic sealers, that is, CeraSeal RC, Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. The specimens were divided into three groups ( n = 20) depending on the sealer used. Rhodamine B fluorescent dye was added to the sealers before using them for obturation. The obturated samples were sealed and placed in 100% humidity at 37oC for 7 days. Gutta-percha was removed from all the samples using retreatment files. Each sample was horizontally sectioned into 2 mm thick slices at 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex, which were analysed under a confocal scanning microscope to detect the depth of penetration of sealer into the dentinal tubules. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests. Intergroup comparison of penetration depth at 3 mm showed that the mean depth of penetration among CeraSeal samples was found to be significantly more as compared to the other two materials, while, no statistically significant difference was found among Bio-C and MTA Fillapex with the significance level established at 5% ( P < .05). Similarly, an intergroup comparison of penetration depth at 5 mm showed that the mean depth of penetration among CeraSeal samples was found to be significantly more as compared to the other two materials, while, no statistically significant difference was found among Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. CeraSeal RC sealer showed significantly higher depth of penetration than Bio-C and MTA Fillapex. All bioceramic sealers show a significant penetration into the dentinal tubules. However, none of the sealers was completely removed from the tubules following retreatment.
各种生物陶瓷封闭剂对根尖牙本质小管渗透性的比较评估
本研究旨在使用共聚焦显微镜评估三种不同生物陶瓷封闭剂在封闭后的残留物的渗透深度和持久性。研究共选择了 60 颗单根人类前臼齿,并对其进行了装饰,以保持 14 毫米的工作长度。对样本进行生物力学制备,并用涂有三种不同生物陶瓷封闭剂(即 CeraSeal RC、Bio-C 和 MTA Fillapex)的 Protaper Universal GP 进行封闭。根据所用封闭剂的不同,试样被分为三组(n = 20)。在使用封闭剂进行封闭前,在封闭剂中添加罗丹明 B 荧光染料。封固后的样本被密封,并放置在 37oC 100%湿度的环境中 7 天。使用再处理锉去除所有样本上的水凝胶。在共聚焦扫描显微镜下进行分析,以检测封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的深度。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验。3 毫米渗透深度的组间比较显示,CeraSeal 样品的平均渗透深度明显高于其他两种材料,而 Bio-C 和 MTA Fillapex 之间则没有显著差异,显著性水平为 5%(P < .05)。同样,5 毫米渗透深度的组间比较显示,CeraSeal 样品的平均渗透深度明显高于其他两种材料,而 Bio-C 和 MTA Fillapex 之间则没有统计学意义上的显著差异。CeraSeal RC 封闭剂的渗透深度明显高于 Bio-C 和 MTA Fillapex。所有生物陶瓷封闭剂都能明显渗入牙本质小管。不过,在再治疗后,没有一种封闭剂能完全从牙本质小管中清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信