Different techniques for identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy

Peter Victor Kamel, Ahmed Saad Ahmed, Usama Saeed Imam, Ahmed Safaa Ahmed, Sherif El Prince Sayed
{"title":"Different techniques for identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy","authors":"Peter Victor Kamel, Ahmed Saad Ahmed, Usama Saeed Imam, Ahmed Safaa Ahmed, Sherif El Prince Sayed","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_315_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Parotidectomy is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Identification of the facial nerve trunk is essential during surgery of the parotid gland to avoid facial nerve injury. A comprehensive knowledge of its anatomy and meticulous dissection are the keys for the identification of the facial nerve trunk and its branches.\n \n \n \n To compare between the traditional antegrade parotidectomy and retrograde in identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy, determination the best anatomical landmark, the time of exploration of facial nerve, outcomes, facial nerve complication, duration of surgery, patient satisfaction as well as other complications.\n \n \n \n Twelve patients who were diagnosed with having parotid gland neoplasms, and had undergone superficial Parotidectomy were recruited and assessed for eligibility at General Surgery Department, Beni-Suef University Hospital. Patients were divided according to the surgical technique into two equal groups, group A (the antegrade dissection group), and group B (the retrograde dissection group), follow-up was 6 months.\n \n \n \n There was no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding pain, paresthesia and pathology postoperation (P value>0.05). Longer mean operation time was observed in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (2.06±0.75 and 1.61±0.31 h, respectively), which was statistically insignificant (P value>0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in facial nerve injury among patients in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (P value=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference between techniques regarding hospital stay duration and complications three months postoperation (P value>0.05).\n \n \n \n Retrograde facial nerve dissection technique is better than the classical antegrade technique in the superficial parotidectomy within this study.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_315_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parotidectomy is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Identification of the facial nerve trunk is essential during surgery of the parotid gland to avoid facial nerve injury. A comprehensive knowledge of its anatomy and meticulous dissection are the keys for the identification of the facial nerve trunk and its branches. To compare between the traditional antegrade parotidectomy and retrograde in identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy, determination the best anatomical landmark, the time of exploration of facial nerve, outcomes, facial nerve complication, duration of surgery, patient satisfaction as well as other complications. Twelve patients who were diagnosed with having parotid gland neoplasms, and had undergone superficial Parotidectomy were recruited and assessed for eligibility at General Surgery Department, Beni-Suef University Hospital. Patients were divided according to the surgical technique into two equal groups, group A (the antegrade dissection group), and group B (the retrograde dissection group), follow-up was 6 months. There was no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding pain, paresthesia and pathology postoperation (P value>0.05). Longer mean operation time was observed in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (2.06±0.75 and 1.61±0.31 h, respectively), which was statistically insignificant (P value>0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in facial nerve injury among patients in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (P value=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference between techniques regarding hospital stay duration and complications three months postoperation (P value>0.05). Retrograde facial nerve dissection technique is better than the classical antegrade technique in the superficial parotidectomy within this study.
腮腺浅层切除术中识别面神经的不同技术
腮腺切除术是治疗腮腺良性和恶性病变的常见手术方法。在腮腺手术中,识别面神经干是避免面神经损伤的关键。全面的解剖知识和细致的解剖是识别面神经干及其分支的关键。 目的:比较传统的腮腺前路切除术和腮腺后路切除术在腮腺浅表切除术中识别面神经的能力,确定最佳解剖标志、探查面神经的时间、结果、面神经并发症、手术时间、患者满意度以及其他并发症。 贝尼苏伊夫大学医院普外科招募并评估了 12 名被诊断为腮腺肿瘤并接受过腮腺浅层切除术的患者。根据手术技术将患者分为两组,A 组(前向剥离组)和 B 组(逆行剥离组),随访 6 个月。 两组在术后疼痛、麻痹和病理方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与逆行剥离组相比,前行剥离组的平均手术时间较长(分别为 2.06±0.75 h 和 1.61±0.31 h),但差异无统计学意义(P 值>0.05)。与逆行剥离组相比,前行剥离组患者的面神经损伤增加,差异有统计学意义(P 值=0.046)。在住院时间和术后三个月的并发症方面,不同技术的差异无统计学意义(P 值>0.05)。 在本研究中,逆行面神经解剖技术在浅表腮腺切除术中优于经典的逆行技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信