Confronting Barriers to Equitable Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Factors That Inform People with Mobility Disabilities’ Decisions to Self-Advocate in the Context of Healthcare

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura VanPuymbrouck, Susan Magasi
{"title":"Confronting Barriers to Equitable Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Factors That Inform People with Mobility Disabilities’ Decisions to Self-Advocate in the Context of Healthcare","authors":"Laura VanPuymbrouck,&nbsp;Susan Magasi","doi":"10.1155/2024/9975084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Background</i>. One in 5 people in the United States live with disability; however, the public health needs of this community have been largely overlooked. Although U.S. law mandates the availability of accessible medical exam equipment, people with mobility disabilities (PWMD) frequently encounter barriers that require self-advocacy to receive basic primary care. <i>Objective</i>. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore the impact of healthcare access barriers—specifically, the experiences of the need to self-advocate and factors that inform decisions to make accommodation requests—for PWMD. <i>Methods</i>. Qualitative semistructured interviews were performed across two phases of data collection with each of the 6 participants. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to highlight the essence of participants’ experiences in making decisions to request healthcare accommodation. <i>Results</i>. Participants included a purposive sample of self-advocates with physical disabilities (3 men and 3 women). While individual approaches to self-advocacy varied, participants identified a process of “recognizing the normalization of disability discrimination and disability stigma” which necessitates the development of “agency in self-advocacy.” This process has a lasting impact on people that includes a shared embodied experience of disability, as well as a sense of empowerment based on their collective and individual identities. <i>Conclusions</i>. Findings have implications for supporting individual disability consumer advocacy efforts as well as the need to address the normalization of disability discrimination within healthcare systems levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9975084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. One in 5 people in the United States live with disability; however, the public health needs of this community have been largely overlooked. Although U.S. law mandates the availability of accessible medical exam equipment, people with mobility disabilities (PWMD) frequently encounter barriers that require self-advocacy to receive basic primary care. Objective. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore the impact of healthcare access barriers—specifically, the experiences of the need to self-advocate and factors that inform decisions to make accommodation requests—for PWMD. Methods. Qualitative semistructured interviews were performed across two phases of data collection with each of the 6 participants. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to highlight the essence of participants’ experiences in making decisions to request healthcare accommodation. Results. Participants included a purposive sample of self-advocates with physical disabilities (3 men and 3 women). While individual approaches to self-advocacy varied, participants identified a process of “recognizing the normalization of disability discrimination and disability stigma” which necessitates the development of “agency in self-advocacy.” This process has a lasting impact on people that includes a shared embodied experience of disability, as well as a sense of empowerment based on their collective and individual identities. Conclusions. Findings have implications for supporting individual disability consumer advocacy efforts as well as the need to address the normalization of disability discrimination within healthcare systems levels.

面对公平护理的障碍:对影响行动不便者决定在医疗保健领域进行自我辩护的因素的定性分析
背景。在美国,每 5 人中就有 1 名残疾人;然而,这一群体的公共卫生需求在很大程度上被忽视了。尽管美国法律规定必须提供无障碍医疗检查设备,但行动不便的残疾人(PWMD)在接受基本初级保健时经常会遇到需要自我倡导的障碍。研究目的本研究旨在从定性角度探讨医疗障碍的影响,特别是需要自我辩护的经历以及决定是否提出便利请求的因素。研究方法对 6 名参与者分别进行了两个阶段的定性半结构式访谈。采用解释性现象学分析来突出参与者在决定申请医疗保健便利时的经验本质。结果调查对象包括有针对性的肢体残疾自我倡导者样本(3 男 3 女)。虽然每个人自我倡导的方法各不相同,但参与者都确定了一个 "认识到残疾歧视和残疾耻辱正常化 "的过程,这一过程需要发展 "自我倡导的能力"。这一过程对人们产生了持久的影响,包括共同的残疾体验,以及基于集体和个人身份的赋权感。结论。研究结果对支持残疾消费者的个人宣传工作以及解决医疗保健系统中的残疾歧视正常化问题具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信