Efferent methods of therapy for critical illness

A. Sarana, Sergey G. Shcherbak, D. A. Vologzhanin, Aleksandr S. Golota, Tatiana A. Kamilova, S. V. Makarenko
{"title":"Efferent methods of therapy for critical illness","authors":"A. Sarana, Sergey G. Shcherbak, D. A. Vologzhanin, Aleksandr S. Golota, Tatiana A. Kamilova, S. V. Makarenko","doi":"10.36425/rehab626652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extracorporeal blood purification is intended to eliminate dysregulation of the immune system. The concept of extracorporeal therapy is based on the nonspecific clearance of inflammatory mediators and triggers, which attenuates the systemic expression of inflammatory mediators. The main types of extracorporeal therapy are hemoadsorption and plasma exchange. Hemoadsorption is used primarily as an adjuvant treatment for septic shock and other severe inflammatory conditions, including severe forms of COVID-19 with cytokine storm. \nReliable data demonstrating the benefit of hemoadsorption in critically ill patientsis is limited. Recommendations for the use of hemoadsorption devices are often based on incomplete data or questionable interpretations of available data. Given the lack of evidence for the benefit of hemoadsorption in the treatment of severe inflammation, sepsis, liver failure and rhabdomyolysis, its routine use in clinical practice is not justified until the mechanisms underlying these findings are fully elucidated. \nPlasma replacement is a potentially life-saving invasive extracorporeal blood purification procedure that replaces plasma with a substitute fluid (saline, albumin solution, fresh frozen plasma, or a combination of these) with the risk of side effects and complications. There is still uncertainty regarding the timing, type of plasma exchange, volume and frequency of plasma filtration. Although plasma replacement is considered to be relatively safe, there is still insufficient evidence to support its inclusion in sepsis treatment protocols. \nReports of the use of extracorporeal methods in the treatment of patients with severe refractory systemic inflammation provide evidence of decreased levels of inflammatory biomarkers, improved hemodynamic parameters, and decreased organ failure. However, according to the results of randomized clinical trials, extracorporeal therapy does not affect clinical outcomes, and in some even increases mortality. To clarify the effectiveness of extracorporeal therapy, it is necessary to study the mechanisms of interaction of the devices used with target and non-target blood components and large-scale randomized controlled trials assessing the ability of this therapy to improve clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":142894,"journal":{"name":"Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab626652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal blood purification is intended to eliminate dysregulation of the immune system. The concept of extracorporeal therapy is based on the nonspecific clearance of inflammatory mediators and triggers, which attenuates the systemic expression of inflammatory mediators. The main types of extracorporeal therapy are hemoadsorption and plasma exchange. Hemoadsorption is used primarily as an adjuvant treatment for septic shock and other severe inflammatory conditions, including severe forms of COVID-19 with cytokine storm. Reliable data demonstrating the benefit of hemoadsorption in critically ill patientsis is limited. Recommendations for the use of hemoadsorption devices are often based on incomplete data or questionable interpretations of available data. Given the lack of evidence for the benefit of hemoadsorption in the treatment of severe inflammation, sepsis, liver failure and rhabdomyolysis, its routine use in clinical practice is not justified until the mechanisms underlying these findings are fully elucidated. Plasma replacement is a potentially life-saving invasive extracorporeal blood purification procedure that replaces plasma with a substitute fluid (saline, albumin solution, fresh frozen plasma, or a combination of these) with the risk of side effects and complications. There is still uncertainty regarding the timing, type of plasma exchange, volume and frequency of plasma filtration. Although plasma replacement is considered to be relatively safe, there is still insufficient evidence to support its inclusion in sepsis treatment protocols. Reports of the use of extracorporeal methods in the treatment of patients with severe refractory systemic inflammation provide evidence of decreased levels of inflammatory biomarkers, improved hemodynamic parameters, and decreased organ failure. However, according to the results of randomized clinical trials, extracorporeal therapy does not affect clinical outcomes, and in some even increases mortality. To clarify the effectiveness of extracorporeal therapy, it is necessary to study the mechanisms of interaction of the devices used with target and non-target blood components and large-scale randomized controlled trials assessing the ability of this therapy to improve clinical outcomes.
治疗危重病的传导方法
体外血液净化旨在消除免疫系统的失调。体外疗法的概念基于非特异性清除炎症介质和诱因,从而减轻炎症介质的全身表达。体外疗法的主要类型是血液吸附和血浆置换。血液吸附主要用于脓毒性休克和其他严重炎症,包括伴有细胞因子风暴的严重 COVID-19 的辅助治疗。能证明血液吸附对重症患者有益的可靠数据十分有限。关于使用血液吸附装置的建议往往基于不完整的数据或对现有数据的可疑解释。鉴于缺乏证据证明血液吸附对治疗严重炎症、败血症、肝功能衰竭和横纹肌溶解症有益,在这些研究结果的机制完全阐明之前,在临床实践中常规使用血液吸附是不合理的。血浆置换是一种可能挽救生命的侵入性体外血液净化程序,用替代液体(生理盐水、白蛋白溶液、新鲜冰冻血浆或这些液体的组合)替代血浆,但有副作用和并发症的风险。关于血浆置换的时间、类型、血浆过滤量和频率,目前仍存在不确定性。尽管血浆置换被认为相对安全,但仍没有足够的证据支持将其纳入败血症治疗方案。关于使用体外方法治疗严重难治性全身炎症患者的报告显示,有证据表明炎症生物标志物水平下降,血液动力学参数改善,器官衰竭减少。然而,根据随机临床试验的结果,体外疗法并不影响临床疗效,在某些情况下甚至会增加死亡率。为了明确体外疗法的有效性,有必要研究所用设备与目标和非目标血液成分的相互作用机制,并进行大规模随机对照试验,评估该疗法改善临床预后的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信