Efficacy of Educational Intervention on Decision Conflict

Ramandeep Kaur, Dimple Madaan, D. Pandher
{"title":"Efficacy of Educational Intervention on Decision Conflict","authors":"Ramandeep Kaur, Dimple Madaan, D. Pandher","doi":"10.1177/0974150x241236312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Decision conflict usually occurs from poor patient involvement in decision making which may cause regrets about the options that were chosen. Health professionals should impart antenatal education to enhance a mother’s belief about her birthing. Objective: To assess the effect of supportive educational intervention on decision conflict among primipara mothers with a fear of childbirth (FOC). Methods: An randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on 205 primipara mothers with an FOC attending Gynae OPD. At 24–28 weeks of pregnancy, mothers were screened for FOC WDEQ-A and then randomly allocated to the experimental (103) and control group (102) and assessed for decision conflict by using a decisional conflict scale. The experimental group was given Supportive educational intervention. At 37–38 weeks of pregnancy, both groups were again assessed for decision conflict. Three participants from the experimental and two from the control group were lost to follow up and the final post-test was completed by 200 participants. Data analysis was done by calculating frequency, mean, standard deviation, Fisher Exact test, chi-square, t-test and F-test using SPSS version 18. Results: There was a significantly lower post-intervention decision conflict score in the experimental group as compared to the control group ( p < .001). No difference was observed in the pre-test score in both groups. Conclusion: Supportive educational intervention was effective in primipara mothers for reducing decision conflict. Improving antenatal emotional well-being will lead to a positive childbirth experience with better perinatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":516964,"journal":{"name":"Nursing &amp; Midwifery Research Journal","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing &amp; Midwifery Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150x241236312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decision conflict usually occurs from poor patient involvement in decision making which may cause regrets about the options that were chosen. Health professionals should impart antenatal education to enhance a mother’s belief about her birthing. Objective: To assess the effect of supportive educational intervention on decision conflict among primipara mothers with a fear of childbirth (FOC). Methods: An randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on 205 primipara mothers with an FOC attending Gynae OPD. At 24–28 weeks of pregnancy, mothers were screened for FOC WDEQ-A and then randomly allocated to the experimental (103) and control group (102) and assessed for decision conflict by using a decisional conflict scale. The experimental group was given Supportive educational intervention. At 37–38 weeks of pregnancy, both groups were again assessed for decision conflict. Three participants from the experimental and two from the control group were lost to follow up and the final post-test was completed by 200 participants. Data analysis was done by calculating frequency, mean, standard deviation, Fisher Exact test, chi-square, t-test and F-test using SPSS version 18. Results: There was a significantly lower post-intervention decision conflict score in the experimental group as compared to the control group ( p < .001). No difference was observed in the pre-test score in both groups. Conclusion: Supportive educational intervention was effective in primipara mothers for reducing decision conflict. Improving antenatal emotional well-being will lead to a positive childbirth experience with better perinatal outcomes.
教育干预对决策冲突的影响
背景:决策冲突通常是由于患者在决策过程中的参与度不高而导致的,这可能会使患者对所选择的方案感到后悔。医护人员应开展产前教育,增强母亲对分娩的信念。目的评估支持性教育干预对初产妇分娩恐惧(FOC)决策冲突的影响。方法:随机对照试验(RCT):对 205 名到妇科门诊就诊的初产妇进行随机对照试验(RCT)。在怀孕 24-28 周时,对母亲进行 FOC WDEQ-A 筛查,然后将她们随机分配到实验组(103 人)和对照组(102 人),并使用决策冲突量表对决策冲突进行评估。实验组接受支持性教育干预。在怀孕 37-38 周时,再次对两组进行决策冲突评估。实验组和对照组分别有 3 人和 2 人失去了随访机会,200 名参与者完成了最终的后测。数据分析采用 SPSS 18 版计算频率、平均值、标准差、费雪精确检验、卡方检验、t 检验和 F 检验。结果实验组干预后的决策冲突得分明显低于对照组(P < .001)。两组在测试前的得分没有差异。结论支持性教育干预对初产妇减少决策冲突是有效的。改善产前情绪将带来积极的分娩体验和更好的围产期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信